Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I mean common, the woman has the aesthetic genetics of a meth addict's "after photo." Now don't get me wrong, I ferried my way into this thread with an open mind and riding the fence. I was expecting maybe a little boob job or chin lift, not to quietly mouth damn and break into a fit of giggly-girl laughter.
Silence is not a loophole around dishonesty. People marry for the total package, that being a combination of looks, intellect, personality, wealth, disposition, beliefs, etc. A woman may put heavy consideration and weight on her future husband being a Christian. That is her right. She shouldn't find out after marriage and three kids that her husband is a practicing Muslim and always was.
Amazing the people who hurray inside beauty "so conveniently" tiptoe around the lying deceiving begins of the relationship. Or doesn't inside beauty count until the second date?
Wow...the woman spends a bunch of money to look better, marries a man, he accuses her of cheating and calls their baby daughter ugly, then she hasto pay him a bunch of money.
Wow. I feel bad for the woman, especially considering she doesnt look too teribly different in the before/after shots.
I find the difference dramatic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetJockey
My eyes are fine...her facial structure is similar, and shes wearing quite a bit of makeup in the second as opposed to nothing or near nothing in the first. If you go take a look at the 'porn stars without makeup' thread in the fashion and beauty subforum youll see how much of a difference makeup can make.
She had her eyes redone, a chin or jaw implant, and a nose job. She is so terribly homely in the first pic compared the the second. That is some fantastic work!
Honestly, the people saying that these kids look like "normal chinese" people sound racist and if there really are 64 trillion different dna combos, what does a "normal chinese person" look like? If I were that guy, and I knew what she looked like previously, I would NOT have married her because even if there are 64 trillion different combos of genetics, I wouldn't even want to risk my kids looking like her.
People that think these kids aren't going to have a hard time getting laid are fooling themselves. Because she lied about her looks in the past, my kids now have to have a crappy life where they will probably be made fun of for having too small of eyes and their mom being called a wh*re because they don't look anything like her. Is that something YOU want for your children?
What are you going to tell your kids when they ask you, "Why is mommy pretty and all the kids at school say I'm ugly?" Call me mean or insensitive or whatever, but in today's world, looks or money will get you the farthest, and looks only lasts so long. I'm glad he sued her. She lied, plain and simple, therefore that marriage contract was already violated when they got married.
From what I read in the linked story, that image is not of the couple in question. It's just a random ad, in fact it's a Korean ad, the people are not Chinese.
And I also would like to know where the source is that says the woman had a genetic anomaly she hid from the husband.
Oh, no, the people pictured are Chinese. They are also NOT the couple the original "article" is talking about. From the linked article:
Quote:
Plastic surgery is a hot topic at the moment in China. A recent advertisement for a Hong Kong plastic surgery clinic has triggered a hot debate in the country. The ad shows a family photo with a beautiful couple surrounded by three children who are, well, ugly ducklings.
Photo - Weibo
The photo caption reads, “The only thing you have to worry about after plastic surgery is explaining it to your children,” E-Today reports.
After an outcry on Chinese micro-blogging sites, the advertising company had to issue a statement saying that the children’s photos had to be retouched.
This photo is not of the couple in question and their children.
The first article did show the before and after shot of the woman, and a baby picture of the little girl. She looks nothing like the before picture of the mother. I wonder if she looks like the father.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
