Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Let's suppose everything about the person was perfect. The only thing is they aren't into the idea of marriage. And they're absolutely firm on that. Other than that one thing, there isn't anything about the person that is commitment-phobe, against children, against shared resources, or ANYTHING.
Would you rather be with the one you know is your soulmate, but no marriage..... or would you give that up and go searching for greener pastures? (Knowing in your heart there most likely isn't any.)
I bring this up because I just read about a popular actress who has been living with the same guy since 1976.
It's Julie Kavner. Maybe that gives you a better picture. My immediate reaction is "Wow, they must be happy."
Because really.... to go against the social norms. Are they both really so against marriage that they fought against it all this time? I'm thinking they must've just been satisfied enough to say, "Why change anything?"
This is one of the easiest questions I've ever answered. Give me the soul-mate but no marriage. I'm not even interested in marriage anyway, especially if it means being with someone who merely makes me think, "Meh."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
