Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-04-2013, 08:43 AM
 
Location: Reno, NV
5,987 posts, read 10,481,734 times
Reputation: 10809

Advertisements

LOL I don't see women that way whatsoever. Most of those labels are just unpleasant ways of saying incompatible. And I don't have a ONS category at all - they would simply fall into one of my other categories depending on a variety of traits. I also don't have a problem with sexually confident and assertive women, as long as they are not indiscriminately promiscuous.

This is how I would "group" women:

1. Women I want nothing to do with for whatever reason, no matter how hot/sexy, etc. They may have character or personality flaws, or are just very incompatible in some way. Most of your categories end up here.
2. Women I would appreciate having as a platonic friend or professional colleague, but there's little or no other attraction.
3. Women I would have as a good friend or possible FWB, but with some incompatibility precluding anything long-term.
4. Women I think are sufficiently compatible and attractive to see as LTR potential, including marriage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-04-2013, 08:43 AM
 
Location: Pa
42,763 posts, read 52,912,119 times
Reputation: 25363
Quote:
Originally Posted by lastwomanstanding View Post
Interesting article
Skel1977 - you have 2 women? Number 3 and number 11 and they are both crazy I think you are wrong about number 8.
I fit more than half of these (from the article, not so much the ones Skel1977 is commenting on) so I guess I'm a mixed breed . Which type a guy likes best depends on the guy. Which of these ladies is most popular? I could see number 1 being popular, temporarily What does everyone think?
4 and 7 I would think are the women men drool over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2013, 08:49 AM
 
1,839 posts, read 3,069,451 times
Reputation: 1102
Quote:
Originally Posted by muleskinner View Post
I like the number 2 and number 10 and not to much interested in anything else
Good numbers
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2013, 08:53 AM
 
1,839 posts, read 3,069,451 times
Reputation: 1102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raena77 View Post
4 and 7 I would think are the women men drool over.
Yes but these are the ones that friends tell them "he's just intimidated by you" when sometimes in actuality he's really not that interested.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2013, 08:55 AM
 
1,839 posts, read 3,069,451 times
Reputation: 1102
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaoistDude View Post
LOL I don't see women that way whatsoever. Most of those labels are just unpleasant ways of saying incompatible. And I don't have a ONS category at all - they would simply fall into one of my other categories depending on a variety of traits. I also don't have a problem with sexually confident and assertive women, as long as they are not indiscriminately promiscuous.

This is how I would "group" women:

1. Women I want nothing to do with for whatever reason, no matter how hot/sexy, etc. They may have character or personality flaws, or are just very incompatible in some way. Most of your categories end up here.
2. Women I would appreciate having as a platonic friend or professional colleague, but there's little or no other attraction.
3. Women I would have as a good friend or possible FWB, but with some incompatibility precluding anything long-term.
4. Women I think are sufficiently compatible and attractive to see as LTR potential, including marriage.
Good categories. Some men think a very high % of women are either crazy or gold diggers. I guess this is like some women think men are only interested in sex.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2013, 08:56 AM
 
5,472 posts, read 7,611,745 times
Reputation: 5793
To be perfectly honest, most guys only have 2 categories that matter.

1. A girl Id boink
2. A girl i would boink AND could see a future with

Difference between 1 and 2, is often girls level of promiscuity
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2013, 08:57 AM
 
4,217 posts, read 7,307,709 times
Reputation: 5372
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ascension2012 View Post

Difference between 1 and 2, is often girls level of promiscuity
Which most men will never know...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2013, 09:01 AM
 
1,839 posts, read 3,069,451 times
Reputation: 1102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ascension2012 View Post
To be perfectly honest, most guys only have 2 categories that matter.

1. A girl Id boink
2. A girl i would boink AND could see a future with

Difference between 1 and 2, is often girls level of promiscuity
So an 11 would be better than a 1?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2013, 09:19 AM
 
Location: Pa
42,763 posts, read 52,912,119 times
Reputation: 25363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ascension2012 View Post
To be perfectly honest, most guys only have 2 categories that matter.

1. A girl Id boink
2. A girl i would boink AND could see a future with

Difference between 1 and 2, is often girls level of promiscuity
Which one is your girl friend?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2013, 09:22 AM
 
523 posts, read 840,880 times
Reputation: 643
Eh, it's too hard to put people in a box like that. Also, what may be an "unattainable" woman for one guy may be the perfect girl for another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top