Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-06-2013, 08:16 PM
 
15,714 posts, read 21,073,381 times
Reputation: 12818

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cindersslipper View Post
I don't agree with the assumption that "counselling" is necessarily a good thing in the first place.

Just like any profession, there are good ones and bad ones. What happens if you get a bad one?
Then you dragged out the process of divorce and lost a good bit of money too. Winning
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-06-2013, 09:38 PM
 
Location: all over the place (figuratively)
6,616 posts, read 4,884,211 times
Reputation: 3601
It wouldn't drag out the process, unless people were looking to be officially divorced in a few weeks, which in 99% of cases is nuts.

Are there bad counselors? Absolutely. But let's assume there are more good than bad, and the idea would allow for switching counselors or both parents deciding that counseling isn't helping and proceeding with divorce. Of course people could post negative reviews on places like Yelp, so the system would be somewhat self-correcting (keeping business away from lousy marriage counselors).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 12:08 AM
 
Location: all over the place (figuratively)
6,616 posts, read 4,884,211 times
Reputation: 3601
I never addressed the negative feedback to my thought that marriage counselors would discount their services to parents on the brink. Why aren't they already doing that? Well, if publicized, their other clients probably would complain about having to pay more. And therapists probably would be more likely to discount when young children are involved than when it's just older children.

Anyway, read this.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/06/130629164737.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium= feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fmind_brai n%2Fpsychology+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Mind+%26+Brain+N ews+--+Psychology%29

I'm thinking maybe it would be safer to only apply the requirement when there are kids under age 16. There isn't enough data on how divorce typically affects children of different ages, but I'm not surprised the article points toward more damage to young children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 01:10 PM
 
36,539 posts, read 30,871,648 times
Reputation: 32816
Quote:
"Much good." You seem to acknowledge that can help a little, and that's just
some lousy government-run class.
Im just going by the number of divorced couples that still can not manage to co parent and use their children as pawns or for revenge. These parenting classes IMO are a good idea just not carried out in a more positive manner. That's generally what happens when gov. mandates. Its just a money maker for those agencies providing the "counseling". They get paid regardless and there is not follow-up. It can even be done on-line.

Quote:
I only learned after starting this thread that, in some places, judges can order
counseling. But why would he or she? I think a judge would rather stay out of
that stuff. Maybe that's why I'd never heard of it before.
Most divorces never go to court. There is a standard division of assets and debt and child custody/support etc. then couples and their attorneys negotiate. Sometimes outside mediation is required. When it all has to go before the judge is when it is a big ol' mess with losts of underlying issues, resentments and bad behavior. This is when the judge might determine that the couple needs counseling. It is their job to deal with that stuff.

Quote:
Unless I see data or reports to the contrary, I'm going to believe that most
couples (with or without kids) never go to counseling before divorcing. Maybe
one side usually wants to, but often it doesn't happen for various reasons. In
my opinion, if a couple divorces without first getting counseling, in almost any
case that means they haven't done enough. (Nagging, putting the other person
first, and some other commonly used amateur techniques don't work.)
I have no idea. In my first divorce (father of our children) he became a violent alcoholic and cheated. No amount of counseling would have helped.

Second time, IDK, I might have once considered it but after doing some research on my own it was obvious he suffered NPD. The hardest thing to accept is that it cant get any better no matter what you do. I tried my best but sometimes you just have to jump ship to keep from drowning.

Quote:
Cost? Okay, $200 per session would be an obvious burden on many people, and I'm
not sure I would be promoting the idea at that price. However, I figure that,
unlike mediation services, marital counseling usually is available for much less
than that. Sometimes, probably not often, health insurance pays for it. Also, I
expect that if government were mandating it, some counselors would step in to
offer discounted visits for self-promotion and/or from a genuine wish to spare
children the pain of divorce.
I have no idea what the cost is for marriage counseling. Again, I think the mandatory parenting classes would be beneficial but not the way they are conducted at least in my state. The attorneys, judges and everyone involved in family court don't really care about the children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 06:40 PM
 
Location: all over the place (figuratively)
6,616 posts, read 4,884,211 times
Reputation: 3601
I wanted to thank your post, but apparently I've spoiled you too much lately.

Based on your experience and anything you've read, do you think a narcissist would be likely to agree to marriage counseling after separation? If not, then that would save everyone's time, since narcissists' relationships usually are doomed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top