Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
All the women on this forum say it does, but why am I not observing this in real life? I don't think my observations are biased in any way.
The guys I know who are best with women:
Guy #1. Big ego, very fake-nice and fake-humble around women. His guy friends all think he's a d-bag. Below average in looks. Doesn't attract super hot women, but plays remarkably well above his league.
Guy #2. Laid back, fun. He is, however, considered hot by many women. No doubt his looks are what is going for him.
Guy #3. Basically the same as Guy #2, except even better looking. I'm pretty sure he could be a male model.
I'll tell you one thing: Laid back and fun are a helluva lot more attractive than this constant negativity you have going on here. You could look like Chris Hemsworth or Henry Cavill and your attitude would have me backing away.
No, that's not how I developed my conclusion. I'll state it in a more rigorous fashion. I think that if you were to select a random sampling of 1000 dudes, the correlation coefficient between their personality and their ability to attract women would come out to r ≈ 0.00.
Just because you use random numbers and apply quasi mathematics to it, doesn't make it anymore accurate.
__________________ ____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
Yeah, but I know a lot of guys who are equally fun-spirited but don't attract women. Good-looking guys are automatically "fun" for women to hang around. Haven't you noticed this? lol
Not at all. What I've noticed is that the plain guys, the mediocre-looking guys make themselves irresistible to women by being bubbly and fun, and by making women feel great.
I'm bald, relatively short, drive an 8 year old car with 150k miles (a honda civic), Make average (at best) money, and have to give half of that away for alimony and child support and I've got a small unit.
Gotta cut it short, headed on a date right now! (must be the Civic!!!!)
It IS the Civic! Civic's are cool! Is it one of those hatchbacks? I love those, and some of the colors they come in! You need to post on the short-guy threads. They never believe me when I say that all the short guys I've known have had women eating out of the palms of their hands. You GO, dude!
"Unattractive" is a word that I don't think I've ever used to describe the physical body of a woman.
I have used the word "ugly" to describe many, many women for who they are on the inside, however.
I've approached women whom I found attractive, which I guarantee is not the status quo for "attractive" by many.
So your findings are that you have a very large range of what women are attractive enough for you, but that (essentially) all of them find you physically too unattractive to date ?
Have you ever seen a girl, and thought, "errrm, no, ...... oh, what the heck ? I always get rejected, so I'll ask her out." (i.e. one that is not attractive to you, but you give her a chance anyways)
'Cause, what the heck, if you think you're that physically unattractive, maybe you ought to give a woman a chance that you aren't attracted to.
I know you've said you've had some very painful rejections from many of these ugly inside women. So, I dunno, I'm just shooting out ideas, seeing if any of them sound any good ...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.