Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-13-2014, 10:00 PM
 
2,560 posts, read 2,638,768 times
Reputation: 1484

Advertisements

I highly doubt depending on one's opinion of what it is to be a sexual loser and to me I think there are more female sexual losers considering the orgasm gap and the statistics suggesting that it's more common for a guy to rape a gal than a gal to rape a guy.

I have my doubts about Baumeister's work in regards to 'women went along with this arrangement' 'as in my opinionin such prehistoric and past time I don't think that all or most sex was consensual.

 
Old 04-13-2014, 10:17 PM
 
Location: NY
774 posts, read 906,671 times
Reputation: 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucario View Post
Not exactly. Unless you are identical twins, the genes your siblings get from your parents vary. They are not the exact same set of alleles you receive from your parents. Full siblings are not 100% genetically identical. Very similar, but not exactly the same.
Ok, you're right, I worded that wrong.

They carry genes from the same people but variations of the genes, same as you can only pass variations of your genes and not the exact same set of alleles to your children.
 
Old 04-13-2014, 10:54 PM
 
Location: Chicago
3,391 posts, read 4,482,291 times
Reputation: 7857
There are an equal number of male and female sexual losers. The difference is, men become losers because they can get no sex, while women become sexual losers because they can only get bad sex.
 
Old 04-14-2014, 04:18 AM
 
1,418 posts, read 1,268,755 times
Reputation: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by RogersParkGuy View Post
There are an equal number of male and female sexual losers. The difference is, men become losers because they can get no sex, while women become sexual losers because they can only get bad sex.
Ya oh well unfortunately
 
Old 04-14-2014, 10:29 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
3,793 posts, read 4,600,716 times
Reputation: 3341
nm

Last edited by nearnorth; 04-14-2014 at 10:30 PM.. Reason: zombie thread
 
Old 04-14-2014, 11:35 PM
 
4,038 posts, read 4,863,922 times
Reputation: 5353
Quote:
Originally Posted by RogersParkGuy View Post
There are an equal number of male and female sexual losers. The difference is, men become losers because they can get no sex, while women become sexual losers because they can only get bad sex.
Bad sex can be like no sex to women. Or worse, it can leave 'em feeling trashed afterwards
 
Old 04-14-2014, 11:41 PM
 
4,038 posts, read 4,863,922 times
Reputation: 5353
Quote:
Originally Posted by udolipixie View Post
I highly doubt depending on one's opinion of what it is to be a sexual loser and to me I think there are more female sexual losers considering the orgasm gap and the statistics suggesting that it's more common for a guy to rape a gal than a gal to rape a guy.

I have my doubts about Baumeister's work in regards to 'women went along with this arrangement' 'as in my opinionin such prehistoric and past time I don't think that all or most sex was consensual.
Good name for it. I can't believe how many women get used that way. Seems like most women, from the stories women tell me.
 
Old 04-14-2014, 11:45 PM
 
8,011 posts, read 8,208,250 times
Reputation: 12164
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaoistDude View Post
What defines the winners and losers? Fundamentally, those who reproduce and pass along their genes are the winners. Those who do not, die out. Survival of the fittest.
Really maybe we need to redefine it. I know and have seen some parents who are definitely not winners.
 
Old 04-15-2014, 12:07 AM
 
18,250 posts, read 16,920,340 times
Reputation: 7553
Quote:
There will naturally be more male sexual losers than female sexual losers
Ain't that the ever-lovin' truth!

Men, through the evolutionary process of being appointed the pursuer, will chase after the most beautiful, fittest women at a ratio of about 50:1. All a women has to do is say, "Yes" or "No".

She will choose the best of the litter and the other 49 losers will have to go home and sulk. You see this in the animal kingdom in every species. Men are members of the animal kingdom with the same instincts. There's no difference between men and 100 million other species.
 
Old 04-15-2014, 07:07 AM
 
Location: Center of the universe
24,645 posts, read 38,651,238 times
Reputation: 11780
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewbiePoster View Post
Bad sex can be like no sex to women. Or worse, it can leave 'em feeling trashed afterwards
A man would rather have bad sex than no sex. Indeed, the question may be: To a man, is there such a thing as bad sex? I would submit that to someone who has little opportunity for sex, bad sex, if there is such a thing, greatly beats the alternative.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top