Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I highly doubt depending on one's opinion of what it is to be a sexual loser and to me I think there are more female sexual losers considering the orgasm gap and the statistics suggesting that it's more common for a guy to rape a gal than a gal to rape a guy.
I have my doubts about Baumeister's work in regards to 'women went along with this arrangement' 'as in my opinionin such prehistoric and past time I don't think that all or most sex was consensual.
Not exactly. Unless you are identical twins, the genes your siblings get from your parents vary. They are not the exact same set of alleles you receive from your parents. Full siblings are not 100% genetically identical. Very similar, but not exactly the same.
Ok, you're right, I worded that wrong.
They carry genes from the same people but variations of the genes, same as you can only pass variations of your genes and not the exact same set of alleles to your children.
There are an equal number of male and female sexual losers. The difference is, men become losers because they can get no sex, while women become sexual losers because they can only get bad sex.
There are an equal number of male and female sexual losers. The difference is, men become losers because they can get no sex, while women become sexual losers because they can only get bad sex.
There are an equal number of male and female sexual losers. The difference is, men become losers because they can get no sex, while women become sexual losers because they can only get bad sex.
Bad sex can be like no sex to women. Or worse, it can leave 'em feeling trashed afterwards
I highly doubt depending on one's opinion of what it is to be a sexual loser and to me I think there are more female sexual losers considering the orgasm gap and the statistics suggesting that it's more common for a guy to rape a gal than a gal to rape a guy.
I have my doubts about Baumeister's work in regards to 'women went along with this arrangement' 'as in my opinionin such prehistoric and past time I don't think that all or most sex was consensual.
Good name for it. I can't believe how many women get used that way. Seems like most women, from the stories women tell me.
What defines the winners and losers? Fundamentally, those who reproduce and pass along their genes are the winners. Those who do not, die out. Survival of the fittest.
Really maybe we need to redefine it. I know and have seen some parents who are definitely not winners.
There will naturally be more male sexual losers than female sexual losers
Ain't that the ever-lovin' truth!
Men, through the evolutionary process of being appointed the pursuer, will chase after the most beautiful, fittest women at a ratio of about 50:1. All a women has to do is say, "Yes" or "No".
She will choose the best of the litter and the other 49 losers will have to go home and sulk. You see this in the animal kingdom in every species. Men are members of the animal kingdom with the same instincts. There's no difference between men and 100 million other species.
Bad sex can be like no sex to women. Or worse, it can leave 'em feeling trashed afterwards
A man would rather have bad sex than no sex. Indeed, the question may be: To a man, is there such a thing as bad sex? I would submit that to someone who has little opportunity for sex, bad sex, if there is such a thing, greatly beats the alternative.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.