Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
My father told me that sex is a dirty nasty thing and only for having children. I have to agree, it is vastly overrated.
Well, that's his opinion and apparently yours. I have nothing but respect for your position but adamantly disagree. While the primary biological purpose of sex may be to procreate, there are literally dozens of other amazing benefits to it.
My wife and I already have three kids and we're not planning on adding any more. But anyone who believes for a second that our sex life is purely for pleasure at this point is mistaken. Sex is a human need, even outside of procreation. And while I am not a "sexpert" I know what has worked for me and my partner over the years. Bad days can be made good with a little intimate attention toward each other. Sex can seal the deal once an argument has ended and an agreement is found. Sex can renew one's interest in his or her partner if they have been going through a rut.
Like I said, I respect the opinion of those who believe sex is only for making babies. But I certainly do not envy them.
My father told me that sex is a dirty nasty thing and only for having children. I have to agree, it is vastly overrated.
My mother was like this until I turned 16, she just didn't want me to get in trouble early on in life.
Sex from a health standpoint is very healthy and not dirty in the least. I believe it is a very healthy action. That does not mean if you don't have sex you will wither up and die. Just look at monks and nuns or other abstinent people, they seem to be doing just fine.
I'd prefer "Nonexistant, 0 times per year" as I'm quite selfish seeing sex as an activity that is mutually desired and done to give and get pleasure so I'm not inclined to do duty/obliged sex or just 'give it up' solely for his benefit. As well as I love my orgasms and enjoy my sexual pleasure and sex I doubt is designed for female orgasms/pleasure and as a heterosexual gal my partner would be a male and the male body I further doubt is designed for female orgasm/pleasure. So nonexistent would be suited for me as that would mean no nagging/pressuring/coercing for sex or enduring non orgasmic or pleasurable sex.
I'd prefer "Nonexistant, 0 times per year" as I'm quite selfish seeing sex as an activity that is mutually desired and done to give and get pleasure so I'm not inclined to do duty/obliged sex or just 'give it up' solely for his benefit. As well as I love my orgasms and enjoy my sexual pleasure and sex I doubt is designed for female orgasms/pleasure and as a heterosexual gal my partner would be a male and the male body I further doubt is designed for female orgasm/pleasure. So nonexistent would be suited for me as that would mean no nagging/pressuring/coercing for sex or enduring non orgasmic or pleasurable sex.
Bit off to me that the thought of others having a relationship with nonexistent sex wilts your d unless you're projecting yourself into such a relationship.
Bit off to me that the thought of others having a relationship with nonexistent sex wilts your d unless you're projecting yourself into such a relationship.
I'd prefer "Nonexistant, 0 times per year" as I'm quite selfish seeing sex as an activity that is mutually desired and done to give and get pleasure so I'm not inclined to do duty/obliged sex or just 'give it up' solely for his benefit. As well as I love my orgasms and enjoy my sexual pleasure and sex I doubt is designed for female orgasms/pleasure and as a heterosexual gal my partner would be a male and the male body I further doubt is designed for female orgasm/pleasure. So nonexistent would be suited for me as that would mean no nagging/pressuring/coercing for sex or enduring non orgasmic or pleasurable sex.
I definitely agree with you that you and no other woman should "give it up" solely for "his" benefit. I believe in the mutual desire of a sexual relationship and that both partners should be on the same page.
I do question the validity of the bolded portion and am hoping you'll elaborate. Clearly I do not see this from a female perspective, but I feel my body is well-suited to accommodate female orgasms and pleasure. Males and females are complementary to each other. Now it is true that depending on a woman's preferences in an intimate situation, her partner may need to develop his technique in order to make her "click." I've been married for almost 8 years and my wife likes certain things that some of my previous partners did not like, and vice versa. This is a matter of adapting to each other, though and not a case of the male body not being well-suited for female orgasms.
I definitely agree with you that you and no other woman should "give it up" solely for "his" benefit. I believe in the mutual desire of a sexual relationship and that both partners should be on the same page.
I do question the validity of the bolded portion and am hoping you'll elaborate. Clearly I do not see this from a female perspective, but I feel my body is well-suited to accommodate female orgasms and pleasure. Males and females are complementary to each other. Now it is true that depending on a woman's preferences in an intimate situation, her partner may need to develop his technique in order to make her "click." I've been married for almost 8 years and my wife likes certain things that some of my previous partners did not like, and vice versa. This is a matter of adapting to each other, though and not a case of the male body not being well-suited for female orgasms.
What say you?
As for the validity of my doubts instead of going to your feelings of how suited you are to accommodate how about evidence such as every single time you've had penetration it resulted in a female orgasm. Egh in my opinion if males and females were complementary to each other the orgasm gap would be nonexistent and gals generally would orgasm from penetration alone...yet that isn't the case going by statistics and studies.
I say statistics and seemingly anatomy and physiology appear to disagree that it's a matter of adapting to each other and agree that it's the male body not being well-suited for female orgasms.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.