Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you think its wrong to have sex before marriage?
It's wrong. 13 16.67%
It's ok. 46 58.97%
It doesn't really matter if you wait or not. 19 24.36%
Voters: 78. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 04-14-2014, 02:58 AM
 
Location: where you sip the tea of the breasts of the spinsters of Utica
8,297 posts, read 14,158,957 times
Reputation: 8105

Advertisements

As far as I can determine, people used to marry at around menarche time for the girls (which varied from 13-18yo, depending on nutritional factors), so that she wouldn't get into trouble and shame the family, maybe even get stoned to death. Guys got married when they had mastered a profession enough to provide a living, usually around 16 or older.

Nowadays, I think marriage is something that should be mainly done to raise children. Otherwise, why not just stay together until you feel like ending it? From this viewpoint, one should only get married if the guy has actually impregnated the girl ..... so sex before marriage would be almost mandatory if one is reasonable.

 
Old 04-14-2014, 03:03 AM
 
Location: I don't know..If you find me, let me know.
639 posts, read 678,453 times
Reputation: 673
Well its okay...
 
Old 04-14-2014, 03:03 AM
 
Location: northwest Illinois
2,331 posts, read 3,212,288 times
Reputation: 2462
Marriage is something people do, because they don't take the time to think about what the hell they're giving UP!
 
Old 04-14-2014, 04:16 PM
 
Location: Texas
746 posts, read 866,167 times
Reputation: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by RogersParkGuy View Post
The issue isn't even the length of time. The issue is, why would anyone get married before they found out if they and their spouse were sexually compatible? It is just crazy...
I have to agree that you should find out of your sexually compatible first.
 
Old 04-14-2014, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Texas
746 posts, read 866,167 times
Reputation: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by midwest61021 View Post
Marriage is something people do, because they don't take the time to think about what the hell they're giving UP!
What would they be giving up?
 
Old 04-14-2014, 04:34 PM
 
1,226 posts, read 1,448,770 times
Reputation: 1294
Quote:
Originally Posted by MynameisnotPeter View Post
Who would wait that long for sex is what I meant. As for getting married 30 is definitely a long to wait to get married. 27 I don't know..........
ME! LOL. I was a 40 yr old virgin when I married. But hey my life really rocks at 40. The saying life begins at 40 is true for me. Although I started dating at 38. So 2 yrs of experience as a serial dater was fun.

I was raised a Catholic so maybe that was part of the reason why I remained a virgin. Although me and husband were intimate before we got married. At that age, I was just glad I wouldn't die a virgin, LOL. Because we kind of broken up after we got intimate. My husband was just ok with me spending weekends at his house and I wasn't ok with it. So I just told him what I want - marriage or we live together.

When I had sex before marriage, I was already 40 so I definitely am mature and sensible enough to know what I was doing. More than anything, I was just glad I wouldn't die a virgin. So when he broke up with me, I was sad honestly, but I was not mad at him or myself. I was just blah about it.

He married me though so would have I turn to hermit if he disappeared completely? Who knows.
 
Old 04-14-2014, 04:37 PM
 
Location: CA
3,467 posts, read 8,141,694 times
Reputation: 4840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woof View Post
As far as I can determine, people used to marry at around menarche time for the girls (which varied from 13-18yo, depending on nutritional factors), so that she wouldn't get into trouble and shame the family, maybe even get stoned to death. Guys got married when they had mastered a profession enough to provide a living, usually around 16 or older.
History has had a variance here.
But a general trend is that adolescence is being extended.
Sure, lifespan is a big longer, but not THAT much so (what lowered average lifespan in past eras was high rates of infant mortality). Yet, the age in which a person is considered emotionally mature seems to be rising.

While we consider 18 yr olds to be legal adults, we expect adolescent behavior well into the 20s. 30 is the "new adult" age.

Is this better reflective of natural human emotional development or is it development in relation to environmental demands and expectations?
In other words, could emotional development prolonged past sexual development because of nurture? The physical maturation hasn't changed much. It's still around 20 that it finishes (ie. women take about 5 years from the start of menstruation to finish developing).

Brain plasticity suggests the length of developmental phases emotionally and mentally may not be set in stone. Perhaps 30 is the new 18 because we have made it so. Maybe it's a de-syncing of the physical and emotional development that is making certain moral concepts seem unnatural...?

Ok, I'm done with my idea tangent. For now.
 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:06 PM
 
14,078 posts, read 16,603,075 times
Reputation: 17654
Quote:
Originally Posted by MynameisnotPeter View Post
From way I've read alot of people wait a long time to get married like 27 or 30 maybe even later! Who's gonna wait that long?
I accidentally selected the "It's wrong" option in the poll (lol), but I don't feel that way. I'm not religious and I think people should just do what's right for them whether it's waiting or not waiting.
 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:11 PM
 
Location: The Hall of Justice
25,901 posts, read 42,686,307 times
Reputation: 42769
Quote:
Originally Posted by augiedogie View Post
If anyone takes the Bible seriously, they might consider what God thinks about it. After all, He is the ultimate judge. Here's what the Bible says:

1Co 6:9 Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders
1Co 6:10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
Incest, polygamy, and concubines are okay, though.
 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:13 PM
 
Location: Texas
746 posts, read 866,167 times
Reputation: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustJulia View Post
Incest, polygamy, and concubines are okay, though.
I'm not religious but I have morals. How terrible those things are terrible!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top