Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you think its wrong to have sex before marriage?
It's wrong. 13 16.67%
It's ok. 46 58.97%
It doesn't really matter if you wait or not. 19 24.36%
Voters: 78. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2014, 11:22 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,974,024 times
Reputation: 40635

Advertisements

Or that marriage is even a possibility. For a good chunk of people living in a large number of states they can't marry the person they're involved with and love.

 
Old 04-15-2014, 11:32 AM
 
3,452 posts, read 4,619,738 times
Reputation: 4985
If you claim to be christian...yes. Otherwise...what you do is your business.
 
Old 04-15-2014, 12:32 PM
 
12,585 posts, read 16,955,404 times
Reputation: 15256
This world is definitely passed all moral sense.

Soon people will want to marry their goats. Then of course, you can't judge them so you will have to accommodate their significant other by adding hay to the menu.

Just a sick, sick world ready for judgement.

"Everybody is doing it!" They claim.

Not everybody. Not EVERYBODY.

This is the modern day Sodom and Gomorrah for sure.
 
Old 04-15-2014, 12:36 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,974,024 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by funymann View Post
Soon people will want to marry their goats.


Unless some huge communication breakthroughs take place, and our laws change significantly, goats cannot give consent.

There isn't really a moral issue here outside of the religious tenet one.
 
Old 04-15-2014, 12:37 PM
bg7
 
7,694 posts, read 10,563,106 times
Reputation: 15300
Its wrong to marry someone without finding out if you are sexually compatible with them beforehand. i.e., its wrong to marry without having had sex with that person.

Common sense.
 
Old 04-15-2014, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Australia
1,057 posts, read 1,691,748 times
Reputation: 1709
Quote:
Originally Posted by funymann View Post
This world is definitely passed all moral sense.

Soon people will want to marry their goats. Then of course, you can't judge them so you will have to accommodate their significant other by adding hay to the menu.

Just a sick, sick world ready for judgement.

"Everybody is doing it!" They claim.

Not everybody. Not EVERYBODY.

This is the modern day Sodom and Gomorrah for sure.
How did you get from "consenting couples having sex with a piece of paper from the government" to "having sex with goats"?
 
Old 04-15-2014, 12:49 PM
 
12,585 posts, read 16,955,404 times
Reputation: 15256
Quote:
Originally Posted by StabbyAbby View Post
How did you get from "consenting couples having sex with a piece of paper from the government" to "having sex with goats"?
People have sex with whomever, whenever and wherever.

There is no morals. The special union between a man and a woman in a marriage is so twisted now. People feel it is necessary to do the deed first. This is not the top priority in a marriage, it is a sweet addition that only those two joined in marriage should do.

The gross moral decline of marriage wanting to be done on peoples own selfish terms are even made between two males or two females makes me see the world also in the future accepting animals.
 
Old 04-15-2014, 12:52 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,974,024 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by funymann View Post
This is not the top priority in a marriage, it is a sweet addition that only those two joined in marriage should do.


Who states what the top priority should be?

And who says what should or shouldn't be done?

(If you don't subscribe to a religious doctrine)

(Oh, two adult males can give consent, as can two adult females... other species of animals cannot consent in any legal way)
 
Old 04-15-2014, 12:54 PM
 
8,779 posts, read 9,454,139 times
Reputation: 9548
Quote:
Originally Posted by funymann View Post
People have sex with whomever, whenever and wherever.

There is no morals. The special union between a man and a woman in a marriage is so twisted now. People feel it is necessary to do the deed first. This is not the top priority in a marriage, it is a sweet addition that only those two joined in marriage should do.

The gross moral decline of marriage wanting to be done on peoples own selfish terms are even made between two males or two females makes me see the world also in the future accepting animals.
"Moral decline" in the way you are describing is just a phasing out of old ways. A shift in the majority.

What are morals?

While I agree in the notion "if you agree to something keep your word" but morals are not a set standard. They are created by man to fit current circumstance.

Last edited by rego00123; 04-15-2014 at 01:05 PM..
 
Old 04-15-2014, 01:06 PM
 
Location: Australia
1,057 posts, read 1,691,748 times
Reputation: 1709
Quote:
Originally Posted by funymann View Post
People have sex with whomever, whenever and wherever.

There is no morals. The special union between a man and a woman in a marriage is so twisted now. People feel it is necessary to do the deed first. This is not the top priority in a marriage, it is a sweet addition that only those two joined in marriage should do.

The gross moral decline of marriage wanting to be done on peoples own selfish terms are even made between two males or two females makes me see the world also in the future accepting animals.

Were you a complete virgin before you married? If not then you are a hypocrite.

Marriage has always primarily been an economic arrangement, not a "special union" blessed by god himself. Marriage for love/romance is a recent development. It was a luxury for people living hundreds or thousands of years ago.

Why exactly do people require a piece of paper from the government before they are allowed to have sex? Quite frankly, I'd never use the Bible as guide for morality. The Bible also says that rape, murder, slavery, incest and genocide are acceptable. If you don't believe me then you can read it yourself. Are you really going to use it as your morality litmus test? Or are you one of those Christians who pick and choose what parts of the bible that are convenient for them?

Let me guess - same sex marriage is wrong because it says so in Leviticus. Does that mean that you are going to follow everything else in the Old Testament or are you just going to latch onto the part that condemns homosexuality but ignore the rest of the Old Testament that isn't CONVENIENT for you?

Sex with animals is always rape and commonly ends up with the animal DYING from their injuries. There is no valid comparison between humans have sex and people having sex with animals.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top