Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you were lacking on your reading comprehension...
and this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by udolipixie
Your seeming lacking reading comprehension...
clearly shows aggression. What's interesting is that I actually admitted that it was a poor choice of words, yet you still seem upset for some reason.
Quote:
Originally Posted by udolipixie
'I don't agree with you there' doesn't reasonably fit as it's illogical to disagree with the summary of my experiences as you didn't experience them to be able to get a different summary. There wouldn't be backlash from me if you said that you found shallowness was mainly a woman's trait. That's your findings that doesn't make it true and you're not making a claim or definitive statement.
Just like you have an opinion (I'm sorry, your fact) that unattractive women are affected more, I can still disagree. I don't "find" dissent illogical. We are on this forum to have a discussion and I disagreed with what you said, despite your findings. Since you disagree with my opinion, you basically disagree with my findings (and that's ok).
Quote:
Originally Posted by udolipixie
As for your claim that it took Justin 37 years are you being misleading by calculating his entire life span as time spent looking for someone to go out on a date with him?
Quote:
Originally Posted by udolipixie
I guess you didn't watch the video. He said it himself. Actually, it was 39 years (for some reason, I thought it was 37 years; I watched it the other day so I forgot that tidbit.
Likely more guys are turning to prostitution/escorting because they can't get the attractive young gals they want so they pay for them.
You do know that many street prostitutes are quite unattractive by society's standards too, right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by udolipixie
Meh disagree all you want. Though in my opinion your counter-argument isn't supported with this single incident where the deformed guy still ended up with a gal who likely isn't deformed. A supportive counter-argument in my opinion would be factual credible evidence that gals are equally visually stimulated as guys, that gals rank physical attractiveness as equally important as guys, that getting older is equally detrimental to a guy's dating options as getting older is for gals, and/or that gals relationship media is majorly about how to get the hot young guy as it seems male relationship media is majorly about how to get the hot young gal.
Well, when you say, once again, only (but, then again, that's in your experience which makes my argument null and void, I guess), that single story shows that, "unattractive" men too are affected by it.
BTW, where is your factual credible counter evidence that women aren't visually-equally stimulated? Just because you see it one way doesn't make it true.
Also, they aren't together (I had to look it up). He is still single to this day.
clearly shows aggression. What's interesting is that I actually admitted that it was a poor choice of words, yet you still seem upset for some reason.
That shows aggression in your opinion. Vastly different opinions as making note on a seemingly lacking reading comprehension by how you misconstrued my words does not clearly shows aggression to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rs4 fan
Just like you have an opinion (I'm sorry, your fact) that unattractive women are affected more, I can still disagree. I don't "find" dissent illogical. We are on this forum to have a discussion and I disagreed with what you said, despite your findings. Since you disagree with my opinion, you basically disagree with my findings (and that's ok).
Fact.....I've repeatedly stated this is the summary of my experiences nowhere did I state, suggest, imply, or even mention it was a fact. It is illogical to disagree with the summary of my experiences as you haven't had my experiences to get a different summary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rs4 fan
You do know that many street prostitutes are quite unattractive by society's standards too, right?
That doesn't negate the many prostitutes that aren't quite unattractive by society's standards.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rs4 fan
Well, when you say, once again, only (but, then again, that's in your experience which makes my argument null and void, I guess), that single story shows that, "unattractive" men too are affected by it.
BTW, where is your factual credible counter evidence that women aren't visually-equally stimulated? Just because you see it one way doesn't make it true.
Also, they aren't together (I had to look it up). He is still single to this day.
Yes it does make your argument null and void. It seems you are trying to twist me stating the summary of my experiences into some claim or fact just to have something to disagree with. That single story showed an extreme case of a deformed guy getting a date with a gal that likely isn't deformed.
I didn't make the claim women aren't visually-stimulated equally so why are you asking me to provide evidence for a claim I didn't make? I'm not even arguing here you're the one doing that so I don't need to provide 'counter evidence'.
You're the one arguing that guys have it as hard in regards to looks(?) so it's on you to provide credible counter evidence. A deformed guy getting a date with a likely non deformed gal is not really supportive evidence in my opinion so I listed what I would find credible supportive evidence. It seems you have no supportive credible evidence for your null and void argument.
Last edited by udolipixie; 06-24-2014 at 04:21 PM..
udolipixie, I agree with him. Pls. don't cut me. I actually think it's coz you're a virgin. I deduced you are based on your post on that closed thread and that post got deleted too I think but you said there that you are not mentally retarded to have sex with men coz of orgasm gap which made me
Trust me. Being a 40 yr old virgin myself. Once I had Sex... I noticed I am more mellow, not always angry at the world, LOOOOOOOOOOOL. And to think sex with my husband is mediocre at best.
But at least I think sex really lifts up your morale once you had it. I think it's what sex NATURALLY does, it is a NATURAL stress reliever. LOL, apart from well getting you off.
udolipixie, I agree with him. Pls. don't cut me. I actually think it's coz you're a virgin. I deduced you are based on your post on that closed thread and that post got deleted too I think but you said there that you are not mentally retarded to have sex with men coz of orgasm gap which made me
Trust me. Being a 40 yr old virgin myself. Once I had Sex... I noticed I am more mellow, not always angry at the world, LOOOOOOOOOOOL. And to think sex with my husband is mediocre at best.
But at least I think sex really lifts up your morale once you had it. I think it's what sex NATURALLY does, it is a NATURAL stress reliever. LOL, apart from well getting you off.
Just sayin.
Egh why would I cut you for agreeing with him? I haven't made any statements, suggestions, or implications that I would physically harm others for differing with me.
I'm amused it 'clearly shows aggression' to state it seems he has lacking reading comprehension because he misconstrued my statements. Especially when he seemed to admit to such stating he used poor word choice.
Perhaps you get angry at the world when you don't have sex...however that's not me. It may be suited not to seemingly project your tendencies onto others.
If anything I would have imagined my post would have shown I'm not angry at the world as I stated I don't have any negative sexual experiences and suggested I was living a lifestyle I found reasonable for myself as I'm not doing what I see as wasting time having sex when I'd likely not get an orgasm from it.
Statistically as a gal heterosexual sex generally does not get gals off so this stress reliever advice may be misleading.
Last edited by udolipixie; 06-24-2014 at 04:56 PM..
Egh why would I cut you for agreeing with him? I haven't made any statements, suggestions, or implications that I would physically harming others for differing with me.
I'm amused it 'clearly shows aggression' to state it seems he has lacking reading comprehension because they misconstrued my statements. Especially when he seemed to admit to such stating he used poor word choice.
Perhaps you get angry at the world when you don't have sex...however that's not me. It may be suited not to seemingly project your tendencies onto others.
If anything I would have imagined my post would have shown I'm not angry at the world as I stated I don't have any negative sexual experiences and suggested I was living a lifestyle I found reasonable for myself as I'm not doing what I see as wasting time having sex when I'd likely not get an orgasm from it.
Statistically as a gal heterosexual sex generally does not get gals off so this stress reliever advice may be misleading.
LOL. Well who said I get off everytime I had sex? It's more than orgasm. Sure it would be nice for women to always reach orgasm everytime they have sex like the guys. But I don't orgasm everytime and I notice how being married mellowed me. In ALL aspects. My attitude has definitely improved.
LOL. Well who said I get off everytime I had sex? It's more than orgasm. Sure it would be nice for women to always reach orgasm everytime they have sex like the guys. But I don't orgasm everytime and I notice how being married mellowed me. In ALL aspects. My attitude has definitely improved.
Egh I didn't state or suggest you said you get off every time you had sex so I'm unsure why you're asking me that question. I did state that gals generally do not orgasm from sex so the notion of sex as a stress reliever may be misleading. For some gals non orgasmic sex is not a stress reliever it may be for you however whether it is for others is a toss up.
Unsure what your post has to do with mine other than you seemingly project that since I'm a virgin I'm angry at the word, not mellow, or something....because I stated it seems someone lacks reading comprehension for misconstruing my statements.
Egh I didn't state or suggest you said you get off every time you had sex so I'm unsure why you're asking me that question. I did state that gals generally do not orgasm from sex so the notion of sex as a stress reliever may be misleading. For some gals non orgasmic sex is not a stress reliever it may be for you however whether it is for others is a toss up.
Unsure what your post has to do with mine other than you seemingly project that since I'm a virgin I'm angry at the word, not mellow, or something....because I stated it seems someone lacks reading comprehension for misconstruing my statements.
Well that's why you're single you think you know it all coz you read stats? Nothing beats EXPERIENCING it. But if you only view sex as physical need then that's why you don't understand me.
I speak for myself since I'm not the type to have sex just coz I'm horny. I need to be emotionally secure with someone to have sex with them.
So maybe even though I am not ALWAYS physically satisfied, I am definitely emotionally fulfilled whenever I have sex with my husband. It's what they call emotional/human bonding much like mother to her child and vice versa. Do you get it now?
I doubt it coz you're too stubborn or proud. I know. I lived it for 40 years. 40 MISERABLE years.
Well that's why you're single you think you know it all coz you read stats? Nothing beats EXPERIENCING it. But if you only view sex as physical need then that's why you don't understand me.
I speak for myself since I'm not the type to have sex just coz I'm horny. I need to be emotionally secure with someone to have sex with them.
So maybe even though I am not ALWAYS physically satisfied, I am definitely emotionally fulfilled whenever I have sex with my husband. It's what they call emotional/human bonding much like mother to her child and vice versa. Do you get it now?
I doubt it coz you're too stubborn or proud. I know. I lived it for 40 years. 40 MISERABLE years.
I'm single because I choose to as I see relationships as a bs deal for gals. If I wanted I could have a boyfriend with any of the guys I'm multi-dating and could have been married at least 3 times (more than three guys proposed however I stopped counting after that).
Nowhere did I state, suggest, or imply I know it all. I did state that sex generally does not produce a female orgasm so it may be misleading to advise sex as a stress reliever as many do not find non orgasmic sex to be a stress reliever.
I don't share your view but I understand that to you sex is more than a physical need. I'm unsure how it's being 'too stubborn or proud' for me to want sex to be orgasmic for me.
Again it seems you're projecting your tendencies onto me. You may have lived miserable years but I haven't.
I'm extremely happy with my life. I have lived tremendously happy years.
Sorry for the late response...had to pick up a friend from work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by udolipixie
That shows aggression in your opinion. Vastly different opinions as making note on a seemingly lacking reading comprehension by how you misconstrued my words does not clearly shows aggression to me.
Merely having an opinion countering yours doesn't constitute aggression. Using symbols and insulting someone does. Nowhere did I insult you or used annoyed symbols in this entire thread.
...but then again, like mine, it is your opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by udolipixie
That doesn't negate the many prostitutes that aren't quite unattractive by society's standards.
It doesn't negate the ones who are quite unattractive either. IMO, it would be far more likely for men to hire gorgeous escorts rather than street prostitutes if they cared about looks over just getting sex.
A lot of men will take anything if they're not getting any sex.
Quote:
Originally Posted by udolipixie
Yes it does make your argument null and void. It seems you are trying to twist me stating the summary of my experiences into some claim or fact just to have something to disagree with. That single story showed an extreme case of a deformed guy getting a date with a gal that likely isn't deformed.
I've said your experiences are your experiences. However, I just don't agree with your statement that it mostly only affects unattractive women, regardless of your experience. Mostly only implies that it's a rarity, yet, you see plenty of men on this very site complain about not being attractive enough for women. I will say, however, that some men here do complain about unattractive women approaching them. I'd tell those guys to be happy anyone approaches them as one day that'll stop.
Quote:
Originally Posted by udolipixie
You're the one arguing that guys have it as hard in regards to looks(?) so it's on you to provide credible counter evidence. A deformed guy getting a date with a likely non deformed gal is not really supportive evidence in my opinion so I listed what I would find credible supportive evidence. It seems you have no supportive credible evidence for your null and void argument.
I did...I used myself and the many guys of C-D as examples. I can provide plenty of links where short men are deemed undateable if you'd like. There's even some all-women hate groups against us.
Quote:
Originally Posted by udolipixie
I didn't make the claim women aren't visually-stimulated equally so why are you asking me to provide evidence for a claim I didn't make? I'm not even arguing here you're the one doing that so I don't need to provide 'counter evidence'.
There goes that aggression again. IMO, smacking your head is aggression. YMMV. BTW, we're both arguing. That's what this is.
You said it mostly only affects women. I provided an example and some others directly above this. Your opinion is your opinion, though.
In any event, I didn't mean for this thread to spiral into what it's becoming. Udolpixie, you can have the last word if you'd like. It doesn't change that I still disagree, but we obviously won't see eye-to-eye on this. Have a good night.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
...I've repeatedly stated this is the summary of my experiences nowhere did I state, suggest, imply, or even mention it was a fact. It is illogical to disagree with the summary of my experiences as you haven't had my experiences to get a different summary.
