Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The rhetoric gay activists uses can easily be spun for polygamy. For example, love knows no number. I also feel like they have the legal argument. I can't say i'm really opposed to it. Do you guys think that polygamy will be legalized and do you support it?
No I don't think it will become legalized because there are too many legal complexities. I could care less if folks want to have multiple spouses as long as they can financially support one another and their offspring. I'm not sure why anyone would want to legally wed more than one when it is perfectly legal to live with multiple partners.
It is important to note that proponents of gay marriage claim they want the same rights as opposite sex couples and do not want to be discriminated against, under the law.
Those same people that support gay marriage discriminate against and want to deny rights to unions of more than two people.
So their argument that they should have the same rights as same self couples while not fighting for the rights of unions involving more than two people means that they only care about themselves and are unwilling to also fight for the rights of people that want to be in unions involving more than two people.
It is important to note that proponents of gay marriage claim they want the same rights as opposite sex couples and do not want to be discriminated against, under the law.
Those same people that support gay marriage discriminate against and want to deny rights to unions of more than two people.
So their argument that they should have the same rights as same self couples while not fighting for the rights of unions involving more than two people means that they only care about themselves and are unwilling to also fight for the rights of people that want to be in unions involving more than two people.
So how would a society extend those marriage rights (inheritance, SS benefits, insurance benefits, child custody, visitation rights, medical decisions, and the other over 1,000 government marital benefits) between two people to three, four, five, six people.
So how would a society extend those marriage rights (inheritance, SS benefits, insurance benefits, child custody, visitation rights, medical decisions, and the other over 1,000 government marital benefits) between two people to three, four, five, six people.
14 amendment would say yes. You can;t discriminate legally based on numbers.
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,016,353 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by NilaJones
No, but polyamory is. I know lawyers who are working on it, long term.
What's with people on this forum thinking polygamy = polyamory? Such ignorance.
Thank you. I think those often get confused.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
