Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, I suppose if a woman is wearing only shoes, she might be more attractive to men than a man wearing clothing would be to women, so the man would have to work a little harder and have to have more going for him than the woman.
Well, I suppose if a woman is wearing only shoes, she might be more attractive to men than a man wearing clothing would be to women, so the man would have to work a little harder and have to have more going for him than the woman.
It is a bit simplistic, but there is some truth to it.
It's more accurate than the image some of the guys here have insisted on in the past, which is that women run after money first, then looks, and they leave out the rest altogether.
It's more accurate than the image some of the guys here have insisted on in the past, which is that women run after money first, then looks, and they leave out the rest altogether.
Like I said there is some truth to it, but it isn't gospel. I think it was meant to be a somewhat funny commentary and not some universal truth.
Also, guys don't come off as particularly flattering either in that picture. It basically states that men put looks ahead of personality and women at least take sense of humor and intellect into account.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.