Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-25-2014, 03:43 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,188 posts, read 107,790,902 times
Reputation: 116087

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cristo666 View Post
Here is an example of the typical post on these forums:

//www.city-data.com/forum/relat...d-my-wife.html

Notice that it was created by a male who is in a situation where is wife is obviously cheating. He can't admit it and HE is currently in therapy for some perceived flaw that she has assigned him.

This is a good representation of the vast majority of threads that I see.
Interesting. My recollection is that the majority of "cheating" threads by married people are posted by women. But, whatever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-25-2014, 03:49 PM
 
377 posts, read 619,835 times
Reputation: 474
Perhaps a gedanken experiment is in order:

Consider the following two online dating profiles: One is a 6'2, 210 lbs of lean muscle, blonde-haired Caucasian man with green eyes. The other is a 5'5, middle-eastern man with brown eyes that might be packing a few extra pounds but not clearly overweight.

Now, if women truly had a diverse set of tastes, there should be just as many women who respond and are attracted to both these men as there are those who ignore them. Does anyone realistically expect that to be the outcome of this experiment? Even if you believe that there are some features that are universal but that women are still varied to a large extent in their preferences, then there should at least be some responses to the middle-eastern man. Not even a single response of interest, actually. If you don't believe me, you should try this experiment for yourself on the online dating website of your choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 03:52 PM
 
Location: EPWV
19,496 posts, read 9,525,458 times
Reputation: 21278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astute View Post
In your experience, do you agree or disagree with the above? Do you agree that men can find a large number of diverse and completely different looking women to be attractive, while women seem to be rather homogenous in their taste and what they find attractive?

Why or why not?
Why must it just be men? I think we all have different ideas as much as we are quite different from one person to the next. Sure, we may share some similarities as do twins, but even then they may have varying likes and dislikes. Age sometimes changes/broadens the horizons as does meeting more people of varying backgrounds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 03:54 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,188 posts, read 107,790,902 times
Reputation: 116087
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astute View Post
Perhaps a gedanken experiment is in order:

Consider the following two online dating profiles: One is a 6'2, 210 lbs of lean muscle, blonde-haired Caucasian man with green eyes. The other is a 5'5, middle-eastern man with brown eyes that might be packing a few extra pounds but not clearly overweight.

Now, if women truly had a diverse set of tastes, there should be just as many women who respond and are attracted to both these men as there are those who ignore them. Does anyone realistically expect that to be the outcome of this experiment? Even if you believe that there are some features that are universal but that women are still varied to a large extent in their preferences, then there should at least be some responses to the middle-eastern man. Not even a single response of interest, actually. If you don't believe me, you should try this experiment for yourself on the online dating website of your choice.
I wouldn't go for either, unless maybe there was something in their profile that was interesting. And why choose middle-eastern for your experiment? What about Asian?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 03:54 PM
 
14,078 posts, read 16,601,291 times
Reputation: 17654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astute View Post
Perhaps a gedanken experiment is in order:

Consider the following two online dating profiles: One is a 6'2, 210 lbs of lean muscle, blonde-haired Caucasian man with green eyes. The other is a 5'5, middle-eastern man with brown eyes that might be packing a few extra pounds but not clearly overweight.

Now, if women truly had a diverse set of tastes, there should be just as many women who respond and are attracted to both these men as there are those who ignore them. Does anyone realistically expect that to be the outcome of this experiment? Even if you believe that there are some features that are universal but that women are still varied to a large extent in their preferences, then there should at least be some responses to the middle-eastern man. Not even a single response of interest, actually. If you don't believe me, you should try this experiment for yourself on the online dating website of your choice.
Considering that there are married "5'5, middle-eastern men with brown eyes that might be packing a few extra pounds but not clearly overweight" out there, someone must be interested in them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 03:58 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,188 posts, read 107,790,902 times
Reputation: 116087
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Like Sugar View Post
Considering that there are married "5'5, middle-eastern men with brown eyes that might be packing a few extra pounds but not clearly overweight" out there, someone must be interested in them.
This is what I was thinking. I was also wondering why for his second option he chose a type from a zone that's in armed conflict with the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 03:58 PM
 
1,165 posts, read 1,220,239 times
Reputation: 1030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Like Sugar View Post
Considering that there are married "5'5, middle-eastern men with brown eyes that might be packing a few extra pounds but not clearly overweight" out there, someone must be interested in them.
Yes, there are. The women that were unable to land the more desirable men. Then, they either consciously or subconsciously adjust their standards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 03:59 PM
 
1,165 posts, read 1,220,239 times
Reputation: 1030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astute View Post
Perhaps a gedanken experiment is in order:

Consider the following two online dating profiles: One is a 6'2, 210 lbs of lean muscle, blonde-haired Caucasian man with green eyes. The other is a 5'5, middle-eastern man with brown eyes that might be packing a few extra pounds but not clearly overweight.

Now, if women truly had a diverse set of tastes, there should be just as many women who respond and are attracted to both these men as there are those who ignore them. Does anyone realistically expect that to be the outcome of this experiment? Even if you believe that there are some features that are universal but that women are still varied to a large extent in their preferences, then there should at least be some responses to the middle-eastern man. Not even a single response of interest, actually. If you don't believe me, you should try this experiment for yourself on the online dating website of your choice.


Spot on. Not sure why this is such a difficult concept for people to wrap their head around. It's like most women are in denial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 03:59 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,384,526 times
Reputation: 55562
No
men have no taste and women do
That is why most women won't date a jobless bum
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 04:01 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,188 posts, read 107,790,902 times
Reputation: 116087
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cristo666 View Post
Yes, there are. The women that were unable to land the more desirable men. Then, they either consciously or subconsciously adjust their standards.
j I don't know why men assume that women who go for short guys, brown guys, short-and-brown guys, scrawny guys, shy guys or average/below average-in-appearance guys assume that women are "settling". This shows profound ignorance about how women think. Probably those guys make the same assumption about their fellow men who settle for chubby women, plain women, flat-chested women. This shows a profound ignorance about human nature and attraction.

Most people who go for individuals who aren't conventionally attractive like magazine models aren't "settling".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top