Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-28-2015, 03:11 AM
 
Location: CA
3,467 posts, read 8,139,836 times
Reputation: 4840

Advertisements

Generally, men who want commited, exclusive relationships seem to want kids. That is the motivation for marriage, I guess. If you just wanted to serial date, then it would not be an issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-28-2015, 03:26 AM
 
474 posts, read 384,336 times
Reputation: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by orangeapple View Post
Generally, men who want commited, exclusive relationships seem to want kids. That is the motivation for marriage, I guess. If you just wanted to serial date, then it would not be an issue.
Disagree. This is the same outlay put on atheists (of which I am also) as having "no moral center". B.S. MOST childfree people don't enjoy loneliness at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2015, 03:38 AM
 
Location: CA
3,467 posts, read 8,139,836 times
Reputation: 4840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tune_It_Lower View Post
Disagree. This is the same outlay put on atheists (of which I am also) as having "no moral center". B.S. MOST childfree people don't enjoy loneliness at all.
It is not a "get married" or "be lonely" dichotomy for most people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2015, 03:53 AM
 
474 posts, read 384,336 times
Reputation: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by orangeapple View Post
It is not a "get married" or "be lonely" dichotomy for most people.
No one said that. There's a chasm between marriage and serial dating however.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2015, 07:29 AM
 
Location: MA
1,623 posts, read 1,722,574 times
Reputation: 3026
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idon'tdateyou View Post
There are people like this out here. I am technically childless (no kids and probably won't have any but never say never)and would date men who don't want kids. Would I marry one? perhaps. My boyfriend is childless but is like me (though he's leaning more towards never having kids).

What is technically childless again? I think either you do or you don't
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2015, 05:11 PM
 
Location: Enterprise, AL
24 posts, read 21,091 times
Reputation: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by stormynh View Post
What is technically childless again? I think either you do or you don't
Childless means just that.... you never had kids, but may or may not still want them.
Also includes those unable to have them or conceive any but may have wanted them or open to adopting.

Childfree on the other hand means never had AND never wants any kids. (like me)
aka childless or childfree by choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2015, 05:13 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,177 posts, read 107,735,907 times
Reputation: 116066
Quote:
Originally Posted by orangeapple View Post
Generally, men who want commited, exclusive relationships seem to want kids. That is the motivation for marriage, I guess. If you just wanted to serial date, then it would not be an issue.
What does a childfree marriage have to do with serial dating? I'm missing something here, sorry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2015, 05:38 PM
 
Location: moved
13,633 posts, read 9,691,284 times
Reputation: 23442
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlazingStars View Post
...the impression I have reading some posts is that there is more pressure for being in a relationship and having a family in the US than in Europe, which could be in part why finding a partner is becoming a more complicated and strenous process. ... It sounds as if some people looking for a partner overanalyse things instead of trying a more simple and natural approach.
It seems to me that the operative problem in America isn't "over-analyzing", but a greater mutual suspension between the two genders, a greater fascination with optimizing one's choices, and a greater pressure to be demonstrably successful in all of one's pursuits (including dating and relationships). I don't think that Europeans are any less pretentious or vane. But they are, I think, less suspicious and less uptight.

To somewhat generalize, Americans are wont to break a relationship upon the slightest misgiving. Americans are so enamored of obtaining only the very best, that a flawed partner is peremptorily discarded, even at the cost of oneself remaining alone for protracted periods of time.

To be sure, Europeans are neither particularly saintly nor wise, as compared to Americans. Neither is there such a monolithic things as "Europeans". But I do think that Europeans are more pragmatic about dating and relationships - which is deeply ironic, given that America is the country of Pragmatism as a philosophical movement!

Quote:
Originally Posted by orangeapple View Post
Generally, men who want commited, exclusive relationships seem to want kids. That is the motivation for marriage, I guess. If you just wanted to serial date, then it would not be an issue.
Reluctantly, I have to agree. Those who are strongly enthused about a committed monogamous lifelong relationship generally also wish to have children. The contrapositive of this, is that those who don't wish to have children aren't strongly enthused about such a relationship. Exceptions of course abound, but my observation in the dating-world is that most persons who are uninterested in parenthood or procreation tend to view the vulnerability and compromises of a lifelong relationship as being an excessive risk. This isn't because they prefer to sleep-around. Not at all. Rather, having established oneself in life - in child-free, solitary life - it seems, to so many, that the permanent merging of one's life with that of another, is justified mainly for purposes of procreation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2015, 05:50 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,177 posts, read 107,735,907 times
Reputation: 116066
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohio_peasant View Post
It seems to me that the operative problem in America isn't "over-analyzing", but a greater mutual suspension between the two genders, a greater fascination with optimizing one's choices, and a greater pressure to be demonstrably successful in all of one's pursuits (including dating and relationships). I don't think that Europeans are any less pretentious or vane. But they are, I think, less suspicious and less uptight.

To somewhat generalize, Americans are wont to break a relationship upon the slightest misgiving. Americans are so enamored of obtaining only the very best, that a flawed partner is peremptorily discarded, even at the cost of oneself remaining alone for protracted periods of time.

To be sure, Europeans are neither particularly saintly nor wise, as compared to Americans. Neither is there such a monolithic things as "Europeans". But I do think that Europeans are more pragmatic about dating and relationships - which is deeply ironic, given that America is the country of Pragmatism as a philosophical movement!



Reluctantly, I have to agree. Those who are strongly enthused about a committed monogamous lifelong relationship generally also wish to have children. The contrapositive of this, is that those who don't wish to have children aren't strongly enthused about such a relationship. Exceptions of course abound, but my observation in the dating-world is that most persons who are uninterested in parenthood or procreation tend to view the vulnerability and compromises of a lifelong relationship as being an excessive risk. This isn't because they prefer to sleep-around. Not at all. Rather, having established oneself in life - in child-free, solitary life - it seems, to so many, that the permanent merging of one's life with that of another, is justified mainly for purposes of procreation.
That simply isn't true. Lots of people who want to remain child-free, and have done so, want to get married, or are living married lives, child-free and happy. There is no correlation, IMO, and in my observation, between wanting to be child-free and not being interested in marriage. Just because some people don't want kids doesn't mean they're not interested in the level of commitment marriage represents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2015, 06:29 PM
 
Location: moved
13,633 posts, read 9,691,284 times
Reputation: 23442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
That simply isn't true. Lots of people who want to remain child-free, and have done so, want to get married, or are living married lives, child-free and happy. There is no correlation, IMO, and in my observation, between wanting to be child-free and not being interested in marriage. Just because some people don't want kids doesn't mean they're not interested in the level of commitment marriage represents.
Barring some infusion of factual statistics, which I certainly don't have handy, we are reduced to personal experience and anecdotal evidence. Thus it is entirely possible for reasonable people to arrive at quite inapposite conclusions.

My own anecdotal evidence is from discussion with other men, and with the women whom I've had occasion to date, either in person or merely at the level of online interchange. The emerging trend is that persons who do not wish to have children tend to look askance at a lifelong relationship, let alone marriage.

We live in skittish times, where even quite level-headed people are beset by fear of monsters under the bed. This evidently holds true across socio-economic classes and cultural backgrounds.

Nevertheless, I hasten to add that the child-free are such a small minority, that no definitive understanding of their (that is, our) proclivities is likely forthcoming. Perhaps in my broad conclusions I am deceived.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top