Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-10-2015, 11:23 PM
 
72 posts, read 67,586 times
Reputation: 60

Advertisements

I am a logical guy so I like to break it down to smaller parts to explain things. It helps with understanding of things.

Say there's 10 guys and 10 gals in a vacuum world trying an online dating website. Let's say there's a normal distribution of attractiveness. What that means is that most guys/gals are average attractiveness ( 4s, 5s, and 6s, with very few in other ends of the spectrum, 1s and 10s).

What will probably happen is that most guys will be messaging the gals.

The gals will *ignore* 8 of the guys who message them and respond to 2 of them.
*The reasons will range from: subpar pics, subpar profiles, subpar messages, creepy messages, creepy pictures, whatever the reason.

It most likely that the 2 guys getting replied back and probably getting replied back from most if not all 10 women. Because it is likely they are attractive, have great pictures, have great messages, whatever the reasons.


So...the 2 guys go on many dates with those women, some end up with sex, some don't. Whatever, they don't care because they are having fun.

The one's that do end up with sex, the guys eventually reveal that they don't want long term relationships. Why would they? They go easily go back online and chance it with a different woman another day!


1. So women get angry and rant all guys online are just players or creeps or losers.


2. And men get angry and rant that women just ignore them.


Would you agree with this?

*Note: I am not bashing OLD, I am simply stating the reality of it. I am fully aware of OLD's benefits and limitations. Of course, I sometimes use OLD when bored in real life, because I obviously know the best way to meet someone is real life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-10-2015, 11:30 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,260,372 times
Reputation: 3444
You forgot that the guys will only message the hottest girls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2015, 11:33 PM
 
Location: Vail, CO
957 posts, read 1,060,201 times
Reputation: 1108
OLD works for some average looking people. I could get dates no problem but it was too hard for me to be myself on a blind date. I couldn't open up for some reason..

I found out I do better getting outside and doing activities with a group of people. Inserting myself in their social circle and stuff. I originally thought OLD would be awesome for shy people like me, turns out its worse! Glad my dating days are over for now. Haha
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2015, 11:36 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,413,299 times
Reputation: 55562
listening to guys try to win at eharmony is like watching them go up to a loaded crooked casino game table expecting to win something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2015, 11:36 PM
 
72 posts, read 67,586 times
Reputation: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
You forgot that the guys will only message the hottest girls.
On the contrary, that is false.

While the hottest girls get a lot more messages... Being average looking online will get u a ton of messages.

Thus ur counterpoint does not invalidate the model
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2015, 11:44 PM
 
1,198 posts, read 1,179,694 times
Reputation: 1530
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
You forgot that the guys will only message the hottest girls.
That's not true. My buddies fat wife said that when she was single, she would get about 10-12 messages a day on most sites, and I can personally attest to dramatically lowering my standards (like most men do) on dating sites. The ball is in their court with online dating. If the roles were reversed, I would probable get a swollen ego and be super choosy too.

Pretty much every guy I've ever talked to has said that they can pull better looking women in real life than they can on the Internet, and pretty much every girl I know has said the opposite (when being truthful)
The statistics say that men get blown off more in the messaging stage, but women get blown off more when it comes to the actual dating from these sites, which points to the notion that a lot of men like myself will message women good enough for sex, but not good enough for dating.

"lock up ur daughters because it's time to hit it and quit it"..............lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2015, 11:45 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,260,372 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by FycBST2 View Post
On the contrary, that is false.

While the hottest girls get a lot more messages... Being average online will get u a ton of messages.

Thus ur counterpoint does not invalidate the model
Your hypothesis is null.

Your Looks and Your Inbox « OkTrends

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2015, 11:48 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,260,372 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucky4life View Post
That's not true. My buddies fat wife said that when she was single, she would get about 10-12 messages a day on most sites, and I can personally attest to dramatically lowering my standards (like most me do) on dating sites. The ball is in their court with online dating. If the roles were reversed, I would probable get a swollen ego and be super choosy too.

Pretty much every guy I've ever talked to has said that they can pull better looking women in real life than they can on the Internet, and pretty much every girl I know has said that they the opposite (when being truthful)
The statistics say that men get blown off more in the messaging stage, but women get blown off more when it comes to the actual dating from these sites.
There is some truth to the bold part.

Your Looks and Your Inbox « OkTrends

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2015, 01:41 AM
 
Location: Denver and Boston
2,071 posts, read 2,209,689 times
Reputation: 3831
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2015, 01:46 AM
 
14,078 posts, read 16,609,532 times
Reputation: 17654
Quote:
Originally Posted by FycBST2 View Post
I am a logical guy so I like to break it down to smaller parts to explain things. It helps with understanding of things.

Say there's 10 guys and 10 gals in a vacuum world trying an online dating website. Let's say there's a normal distribution of attractiveness. What that means is that most guys/gals are average attractiveness ( 4s, 5s, and 6s, with very few in other ends of the spectrum, 1s and 10s).

What will probably happen is that most guys will be messaging the gals.

The gals will *ignore* 8 of the guys who message them and respond to 2 of them.
*The reasons will range from: subpar pics, subpar profiles, subpar messages, creepy messages, creepy pictures, whatever the reason.

It most likely that the 2 guys getting replied back and probably getting replied back from most if not all 10 women. Because it is likely they are attractive, have great pictures, have great messages, whatever the reasons.


So...the 2 guys go on many dates with those women, some end up with sex, some don't. Whatever, they don't care because they are having fun.

The one's that do end up with sex, the guys eventually reveal that they don't want long term relationships. Why would they? They go easily go back online and chance it with a different woman another day!
This isn't always the outcome. Some guys do settle down with one woman instead of continually playing the field.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top