Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-07-2015, 07:41 AM
 
Location: Illinois
4,751 posts, read 5,437,976 times
Reputation: 13001

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacktheknife View Post
Only a feminist would equate taking their husband's last name with being "property"

I threw that out there because I have heard the silly argument before and knew at least one of you would take the bait, and you did...



And only an uppity feminist would equate taking her husband's last name with being property or "erasing heritage", etc

Why get married? Why have a wedding ceremony, rings, etc I mean it's just tradition
Then clearly you don't know your history, when women became their husband's property upon marriage, as well as any children they bore. Yes, human beings treated as property, what a lovely tradition. Even later when women became "Mrs. George Smith" - so her first name meant nothing either. It's a ridiculous, backwards tradition that needs to go.

There are plenty of people who are doing away with "traditional" wedding ideas. Good for them

And yes, I am a proud and uppity feminist who likes my name and plan to keep it. Any man who doesn't understand that doesn't understand me and would certainly never become my husband.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-07-2015, 07:44 AM
 
81 posts, read 88,042 times
Reputation: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonBeam33 View Post
And yes, I am a proud and uppity feminist who likes my name and plan to keep it. Any man who doesn't understand that doesn't understand me and would certainly never become my husband.
And I bet you're single too?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 07:53 AM
 
Location: New Yawk
9,196 posts, read 7,230,149 times
Reputation: 15315
I have a very odd sense of humor, so if my maiden name were Glasscock, I would definitely keep it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by funymann View Post
I don't see a big deal if you keep it.

However, why would you want to keep the name, "Glasscock?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 07:58 AM
 
Location: The analog world
17,077 posts, read 13,364,015 times
Reputation: 22904
Ha! After doing some reading on Dutch naming conventions, I've learned that women do not typically give up their maiden name upon marriage, and it is given precedence in legal matters. So my retention of my maiden name is perfectly appropriate for a woman of Dutch ancestry, even though I did not know it at the time of my marriage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 08:03 AM
 
Location: Illinois
4,751 posts, read 5,437,976 times
Reputation: 13001
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacktheknife View Post
And I bet you're single too?
Aw, boo hoo - are you trying to hurt my feeeeelings?


Go read a book. You might learn something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 08:07 AM
 
81 posts, read 88,042 times
Reputation: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonBeam33 View Post
Aw, boo hoo - are you trying to hurt my feeeeelings?


Go read a book. You might learn something.
Nope, not trying to hurt your feelings, just making a (valid, I believe) point... that look / attitude is not really attractive to many men
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 08:08 AM
 
27,957 posts, read 39,771,359 times
Reputation: 26197
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacktheknife View Post
Nope, not trying to hurt your feelings, just making a (valid, I believe) point... that look / attitude is not really attractive to many men
I'd say you failed miserably. You validate the point you try to discredit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 08:14 AM
 
Location: St. Catharines, ON
718 posts, read 615,795 times
Reputation: 1024
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacktheknife View Post
Yep, a bunch of selfish feminists who are more concerned with proving some point like they are nobody's property or some such BS.

I find it highly disrespectful and would not stand for it
What the actual heck is selfish about keeping your maiden name? Jesus. I would counter that it is very egocentric of you to feel that you are entitled to such a thing. It's MY name, for crying out loud.

Personally, I would, but any woman who doesn't isn't being selfish or "disrespectful". To think so, would be absolutely ridiculous. You need to keep that esteemed ego in check.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 08:20 AM
 
81 posts, read 88,042 times
Reputation: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashleyga View Post
What the actual heck is selfish about keeping your maiden name? Jesus. I would counter that it is very egocentric of you to feel that you are entitled to such a thing. It's MY name, for crying out loud.
I think it is a societal norm, it's an accepted practice that you do this. Deviating from this for no valid reason I feel it to be disrespectful. And it's not YOUR name if you get down to it... it's your DAD's name. Just remember that. He gave it to you and your mom. Surname has always been from the Patriarchal side. This goes back Centuries.

Quote:
Personally, I would, but any woman who doesn't isn't being selfish or "disrespectful". To think so, would be absolutely ridiculous. You need to keep that esteemed ego in check.
So you don't think it is disrespectful to go against societal norms for selfish reasons?

I mean honestly, please justify your reasoning for wanting to do this other than "I feel like it" or "i'm not anyone's property"... if that's your argument, then you lose

Outside of some sort of name recognition thing, which I think is valid and would accept that, I have not seen one valid argument for it

Let me go a step further, if you keep your maiden name and you have a child, whose last name does the child get?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 08:20 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
2,722 posts, read 5,470,430 times
Reputation: 2223
I changed mine after being married for a year and half. It was just laziness though.
I have now changed it and I am still the same person I always was and my family heritage is still in tact. I could have left it as was, but it seemed like taking my husbands name was the right thing to do. It seemed natural.

If you have kids and don't take your husbands last name, what name do you give your offspring? I'm just curious how people work that one out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top