Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-04-2015, 02:20 PM
 
14,078 posts, read 16,614,275 times
Reputation: 17654

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bebe182 View Post
I'm sure there's been a thread on this before, but I just can't find it. So was just wondering what site are you guys having the most success on?

Currently I'm on match, and have been since March but my membership is up for renewal in a couple of weeks and thinking of taking a break from this site, since I haven't really found anyone that interests me on there in the past couple of months. Prior to Match, I was on jdate for a while, so was thinking of going back but when I did a search on there, found it to be the same exact people that were on there 2 years ago when I left the site. So any suggestions? I'm a bit leery of using free sites so I'd prefer a paid site.
I wouldn't be leery of free sites if I were you. I found Match and Eharmony to be much more useless than the free sites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-04-2015, 02:40 PM
 
3,850 posts, read 4,154,110 times
Reputation: 7868
How do you define success?

I was on Match off and on for years, had a few good dates, a handful of bad ones, and one very so-so relationship that lasted a few months.

I only met maybe 3 or 4 guys from POF, but one of them was my husband. So...I guess POF was more successful for me.

I never used OK Cupid, it seemed to be gaining popularity around the time I met my husband a little over 3 years ago. Seemed to skew younger. I had no idea it was owned by Match.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 02:58 PM
 
1,838 posts, read 2,976,888 times
Reputation: 1562
I know two couples that are getting married that met on Eharmony.

The people I know who met each other on Match did not make it past the year mark.

I know people who have met their spouse on POF & OKC but it was many years ago as I hear POF is basically a "hook up" site now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 03:04 PM
 
474 posts, read 384,660 times
Reputation: 385
MySpace.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 03:15 PM
 
Location: Southern Illinois
10,363 posts, read 20,801,723 times
Reputation: 15643
I've used mainly OKC and POF and while I tend to like the format of OKC better, I get more dates and relationships with POF. Also, lately I deleted my profile on OKC b/c something went haywire with the matching system and it has me listed as very kinky! I went thru and looked at my match questions and I can't figure out for the life of me where they're getting that but it sure is getting me some unwanted attention.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 04:11 PM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
28,226 posts, read 36,883,248 times
Reputation: 28563
Online hates me. Basically everyone I met was an ill-adjusted weirdo. I am also not photogenic and my "type" is not popular online. I find I meet better people in real life, where I shine through more! I am warm and friendly in real life and you can't see that in an online profile.

* If you are white or asian in the Bay Area online is a breeze. If you are not, you will get any number of they types of psychos that are out there responding to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 04:26 PM
 
3,218 posts, read 2,811,300 times
Reputation: 3459
Quote:
Originally Posted by NWGirl74 View Post
OP, doesn't Match has a 6 month guarantee that if you don't meet someone, you get the next 6 months for free, or did you not sign up for 6 months upfront? Do they still do that, or did they have to stop due to giving away too many free subscriptions?
Yes they still have it, I didn't sign up for 6 months up front though, I did three month increments. They're now offering me another 3 months for the price of one, but I still think I need to get off the site for a bit, so it's not about the money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Ames, Iowa
361 posts, read 333,939 times
Reputation: 363
I dislike online dating immensely. If I could start a nationwide campaign against it, I would but there are a few people who seem to benefit from it.

For the most part, I hear nothing but awkward, weird dates. Why? Because online dating by definition(in my opinion) is super awkward.

It goes against nature, chemistry and some of the most basic laws of Physics and Science, the natural way of meeting someone involves flirting, talking, pursuing, chemistry which can only be done if you talk or see someone face-to-face.

With that being said, I like Tinder because it is fun, it more casual and it is more like playing a game. It has no matching, no profile to fill out, you see someone you like, you like them and if they like you, then anything can happen.

I think the future of dating will either go towards Tinder(simpler, hook-up type of apps) or hopefully go back to the old days when people met at places like dances and balls- what a great way to meet people!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 04:59 PM
 
Location: moved
13,656 posts, read 9,717,813 times
Reputation: 23481
I've gone through periods of intense activity in POF and OKC, followed by periods of stasis and inattention. Observations:

1. With enough perseverance, it is possible to find girlfriend-material (mine being the male perspective), but it is inordinately harder to find a mutual match with a potential life-partner.

2. People are capricious and noncommittal; I believe that the vernacular term for this is "flaky". I've had several instances where an intimate and presumably mutually-satisfying relationship was terminated with no notice.

3. Obviously, areas with low population density will offer fewer options, and will necessitate longer driving-distances.

4. Echoing what others have noted here and elsewhere, my best dates tended to have been those where the woman contacted me first, and not vice versa.

Thus, my cunning plan for reforming online dating: institute a policy where ONLY women could contact men. Men would not be able to initiate contact. That would remove the louche and obscene messages by men, improving security for women. And it would motivate the women to become more active.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 06:06 PM
 
3,218 posts, read 2,811,300 times
Reputation: 3459
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohio_peasant View Post
I've gone through periods of intense activity in POF and OKC, followed by periods of stasis and inattention. Observations:

1. With enough perseverance, it is possible to find girlfriend-material (mine being the male perspective), but it is inordinately harder to find a mutual match with a potential life-partner.

2. People are capricious and noncommittal; I believe that the vernacular term for this is "flaky". I've had several instances where an intimate and presumably mutually-satisfying relationship was terminated with no notice.

3. Obviously, areas with low population density will offer fewer options, and will necessitate longer driving-distances.

4. Echoing what others have noted here and elsewhere, my best dates tended to have been those where the woman contacted me first, and not vice versa.

Thus, my cunning plan for reforming online dating: institute a policy where ONLY women could contact men. Men would not be able to initiate contact. That would remove the louche and obscene messages by men, improving security for women. And it would motivate the women to become more active.
Coincidentally my best dates have been the ones where I initiated contact as well, so there must be something to it! Haha
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top