Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-08-2016, 10:34 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,750,608 times
Reputation: 16993

Advertisements

Get a inflatable doll instead, no need for reciprocating.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-09-2016, 03:31 AM
 
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
10,930 posts, read 11,717,447 times
Reputation: 13170
Not mandatory at all for some couples, but not everyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2016, 03:49 AM
 
Location: Polynesia
2,704 posts, read 1,829,673 times
Reputation: 4826
Let me say upfront that my husband is gorgeous and I'm pretty sure he likes looking at me too. That said, attraction is mostly mental and emotional for me. So being physically beautiful is something I feel that I can easily look past, frankly. We are getting older, and not as good looking as we were ten years ago. I'm sure that even if he lost his hair and grew a gut, I would still not be able to resist his kisses. Just seeing him smile, or feeling the touch of his hand on the small of my back can make me swoon. If he got into an accident and was badly wounded, broken, and scarred, it would not phase me or my desire for him.

So my answer to the question is yes, I can see beyond the visual to feel sexual attraction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2016, 06:12 AM
 
Location: NY
9,131 posts, read 19,997,945 times
Reputation: 11707
Physical attraction is portrayed in our culture as an immediate, visual absolute in many respects. Everywhere we turn marketers are throwing the epitome of visual beauty at us to sell us things, attract our attention, etc, through exciting our desires.

However, that kind of attraction should not be assumed as the only way to be deeply attracted to, or desire someone either.

You can be attracted to someone and desire someone based on the complete package, and not just based on absolute physical traits. This kind of attraction can also develop and deepen more over time, as the qualities in a person that can foster such attraction must be learned about someone over as you get to know them. Finding non physical traits attractive can and does (for many people) enhance physical attraction as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2016, 07:24 AM
 
Location: The Hall of Justice
25,901 posts, read 42,682,985 times
Reputation: 42769
Quote:
Originally Posted by Butterflyfish View Post
Let me say upfront that my husband is gorgeous and I'm pretty sure he likes looking at me too. That said, attraction is mostly mental and emotional for me. So being physically beautiful is something I feel that I can easily look past, frankly. We are getting older, and not as good looking as we were ten years ago. I'm sure that even if he lost his hair and grew a gut, I would still not be able to resist his kisses. Just seeing him smile, or feeling the touch of his hand on the small of my back can make me swoon. If he got into an accident and was badly wounded, broken, and scarred, it would not phase me or my desire for him.

So my answer to the question is yes, I can see beyond the visual to feel sexual attraction.
That wasn't the question, though. The question was whether you could get past knowing your husband was not attracted to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2016, 07:26 AM
 
24,557 posts, read 18,230,382 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Checkered24 View Post
Physical attraction is portrayed in our culture as an immediate, visual absolute in many respects. Everywhere we turn marketers are throwing the epitome of visual beauty at us to sell us things, attract our attention, etc, through exciting our desires.

However, that kind of attraction should not be assumed as the only way to be deeply attracted to, or desire someone either.

You can be attracted to someone and desire someone based on the complete package, and not just based on absolute physical traits. This kind of attraction can also develop and deepen more over time, as the qualities in a person that can foster such attraction must be learned about someone over as you get to know them. Finding non physical traits attractive can and does (for many people) enhance physical attraction as well.
This is pretty much what I was going to write. Most women don't look like Hollywood stars. Most men have no shot at making the cover of GQ. American culture markets the illusion that this is what's important. It's incredibly superficial. What really matters is basic compatibility and the sexual bit is only a very small part of it. The lust part of a relationship wears off in time. All the rest of it needs to be solid or the relationship is doomed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2016, 07:57 AM
 
Location: Land of Wind & Ghosts - Florida
98 posts, read 72,736 times
Reputation: 88
You are talking about a loveless marriage, an arrangement. Those are very dangerous...... relationships take work, and love is the payoff for that work. Without getting payed, a person would eventually want to quit their job....... in marriage, that spells divorce.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2016, 09:09 AM
 
Location: Katonah, NY
21,192 posts, read 25,156,959 times
Reputation: 22275
Quote:
Originally Posted by Checkered24 View Post
Physical attraction is portrayed in our culture as an immediate, visual absolute in many respects. Everywhere we turn marketers are throwing the epitome of visual beauty at us to sell us things, attract our attention, etc, through exciting our desires.

However, that kind of attraction should not be assumed as the only way to be deeply attracted to, or desire someone either.

You can be attracted to someone and desire someone based on the complete package, and not just based on absolute physical traits. This kind of attraction can also develop and deepen more over time, as the qualities in a person that can foster such attraction must be learned about someone over as you get to know them. Finding non physical traits attractive can and does (for many people) enhance physical attraction as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
This is pretty much what I was going to write. Most women don't look like Hollywood stars. Most men have no shot at making the cover of GQ. American culture markets the illusion that this is what's important. It's incredibly superficial. What really matters is basic compatibility and the sexual bit is only a very small part of it. The lust part of a relationship wears off in time. All the rest of it needs to be solid or the relationship is doomed.
I don't think that you two are saying the same thing at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2016, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Des Moines, IA, USA
579 posts, read 431,909 times
Reputation: 810
OP - I don't know the fine details of your relationship...but I'd be very hesistant. I was in a relationship like this, on the side of the less attracted person. I met the guy online, and we got to know each other that way. I felt close to him. I saw some pictures - not very good quality ones though. When I met him in person, my first instinct was that was I not attracted to him. I mean, he wasn't horrible-looking; he just wasn't someone I'd see at random and think "Oh, I'd like to get to know HIM...". I was instantly conflicted, because I really DID want to get to know him more, based on what I'd already experienced. So I put that initial distaste (? - sounds strong, maybe) aside and kept with it. It was alright, but it didn't last (about 5-6 years). This wasn't by any means the only problem with the relationship. But I was able to overlook some of the problems due to the whole 'early relationship rush', and once that was past, my interest waned. Relationships can be hard anyway; having sexual attraction be lacking is not a good way to start, IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2016, 11:32 AM
 
1,038 posts, read 902,199 times
Reputation: 1730
Marriage without attraction = roommates
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top