Quote:
Originally Posted by JustJulia
Nine months is your longest relationship? I would date someone exclusively for at least that long and figure out whether monogamy is something you really want. You need to get past the shiny new infatuation stage. And your past is your own business.
|
This.
OP, I'm personally in the "don't have the numbers conversation" camp, as a
general rule. In my experience, and with the people I have been in relationships with, what has been vastly more useful is having meaningful discussions about prior relationships. How did they begin? How did they end? How long were they? How does this person speak about their ex? Things like that.
If someone tells me that they are interested in having an exclusive long term relationship, I want to know why. I want to know, to the extent possible, if they are capable of such a thing.
In your situation, you are facing the old "catch-22". You can't get experience without the opportunity, and you might have trouble getting the opportunity without experience. In that regard, I would echo JustJulia's suggestion. If you think that marriage might be something you want in the future, start with one of the preliminary steps- getting past the "honeymoon stage" of a relationship.
From my own perspective (certainly not trying to speak for anyone else but myself), what would be most important is that you demonstrate an understanding that marriage is about step 19, when you are only at step 3. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. There is, IMO, a natural progression of things. If I were in the market at this point, I don't know that I would be looking specifically for someone without LTR experience, but if that happened, what I would be most interested in knowing is that this person had the capability of being in such a relationship. That starts, from my POV, with taking things one step at a time.
Don't worry about the possibilities of step 19 when you're still at step 3. There's definitely something to be said for enjoying the journey.