Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You might be aware that there is entire SEASONS of episodes of a show called snapped that portrays WOMEN killing their HUSBANDS.
Generally over a life insurance policy, but also over other lovers, etc..
So pretending like there is a moral virtuosity here among women over men is a fallacy. To make a generality out as "men" are a dangerous entity against women is just ludicrous.
Isn't this thread about reactions to being told "no"? Not about violence due to other factors?
If it were just a general violence thread then the above would make more sense.
No, entitlement would be if they believed they deserve such men or are owed such men (are entitled to them). There is nothing being entitled about going after them.
Best looking to them. And the perception of looks can grow and change based om interactions with that person, how they treat her, their personality, etc. This turns someone whommay not be comvemtionally attractive into someone said woman oerceives as hot.
Great pop culture example: Charlotte’s character at the end of Sex and The City’s run, and her husband. Who she initially wrote off as too short, too wrong and too ugly.
Of course the tactic of manipulation is that there was abuse.
Mostly women use manipulation without overt physical confrontation in rejection. Car tires slashed, etc happens quite frequently.
There is no moral supreme high ground here when it comes to genders. That is the point, but I can illuminate concepts in multiple ways for those that have trouble understanding basic concepts.
Of course the tactic of manipulation is that there was abuse.
So what you're saying is, you found a vid, decided it was a lie, and posted it anyway...with your own hypothesis thrown in there.
Gotcha.
Violence is committed by both sexes but now you've been corrected on including your initial assertion, that women killing for insurance money is the same as men killing women for saying no to sex, and you are now asserting that some women can be violent against men for saying no. That can happen, I believe, there are certainly stories, though the above video isn't one, but at least we're loosely back on track here.
BTW, the fact that women can be violent doesn't negate the fact that some men may be violent in reaction to being told "no," ergo that part of your assertion - that it's "ludicrous" - doesn't make much sense. Men can indeed be violent in reaction to being told "no." IME that's been minimal but it's the subject of this thread.
I'll use another example, one time I approached a woman and although she was flatted (her words, not mine) when I asked for her phone number she said laughed and said, "I don't know."
My point: If isn't a yes, it's a rejection. Take it at face value and move on. Don't force the issue you come off as creepy and aggressive.
It really makes you think about how much women suffer. As a man I apologize unreservedly for all the harm we have done. Peace and blessings.
pffft .... ok ........
You've done nothing wrong, no need to apologize.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
