Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-27-2019, 11:38 PM
 
1,026 posts, read 1,514,799 times
Reputation: 859

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by M3Guy View Post
Yea these days, if men pass up a girl because she is a little overweight, we get accused of "fat shaming". Or if a man passes up a girl because she is a single mom, he is not considered a "real man", because real men take care of other men's children. Men can't have standards anymore. So our hands are tied, srjth. What do you suppose we do? I'm open to your advice.
Well it's kind of the same for women. Most guys that are single and looking have kids (probably why it's harder to find someone, and why they end up being on dating sites longer), but if we don't want to date someone that has kids, then we're too picky and intolerant, because we're gals after all, and what gal doesn't love kids!? I feel like the old stereotype was single moms, and of course guys think she just must be looking for a new dad. But now, there are just as many if not more guys who have young kids out there, yet if we're just as wary as guys are or were about single moms, then we're the bad ones.

and it's the same for looks...as evidenced in this thread, some guys seem to think we're all looking for perfectly shaped models not true. but if we're not desperate enough, it's "oh, you're really not that great looking yourself, sweetheart" or "have you looked in the mirror lately?" they just love to tell us what they think we deserve.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-28-2019, 12:52 AM
 
Location: West Seattle
6,380 posts, read 5,002,937 times
Reputation: 8458
The simple answer is that they're resentful that women can get interest on dating sites much easier than men can, and they try to get back at women by insulting them.

The thing is, the greater sexual interest that women receive is a double-edged sword, because it means they get a lot more threats and harassment and are more likely to be attacked, and even the men they decide to date may end up just using them for sex and leaving when they're no longer satisfied.

Quote:
Originally Posted by srjth View Post
This whole division between "Nice guys" and "Jerks" was created by men. It doesn't exist. They're all just men.
I disagree with this, but the guys who have to tell you they're "nice guys" aren't really nice. They're just a subset of jerks that lacks confidence and social skills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 01:28 AM
 
1,026 posts, read 1,514,799 times
Reputation: 859
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTimidBlueBars View Post
The simple answer is that they're resentful that women can get interest on dating sites much easier than men can, and they try to get back at women by insulting them.

The thing is, the greater sexual interest that women receive is a double-edged sword, because it means they get a lot more threats and harassment and are more likely to be attacked, and even the men they decide to date may end up just using them for sex and leaving when they're no longer satisfied.
bingo. yes and that annoys me when they always act like we have it so much easier just because it's easier to get a date or attention, or sex...well they're just admitting what horndogs they all are, that there's an abundance of guys whenever a girl wants one. but so? unless a girl just wants attention or sex, that doesn't really matter. more available guys that may be interested, doesn't mean that finding something meaningful is any easier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 01:33 AM
 
1,026 posts, read 1,514,799 times
Reputation: 859
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTimidBlueBars View Post
the guys who have to tell you they're "nice guys" aren't really nice. They're just a subset of jerks that lacks confidence and social skills.
I don't think the "nice" guys call themselves nice. It's that they seem nice compared to the jerks that are full of themselves, impatient, pushy, etc. But going back to my previous post, yes, it seems that a "nice" guy is just one that isn't getting any.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 03:03 AM
 
Location: Huntersville/Charlotte, NC and Washington, DC
26,700 posts, read 41,748,461 times
Reputation: 41381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor76 View Post
I hope that doesn't happen. My main source of entertainment right now is Love after Lockup and 90 Day Fiancee. With legislation like that passed, I don't know what I will do for Trash TV.
I’m honestly torn. I love watching people make such stupid choices in love on those shows. But I think for the good of the gene pool, stupid love choices should be regulated so we aren’t just breeding more idiots. Humanity is stupid enough already for the most part.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 05:39 AM
 
3,926 posts, read 2,035,856 times
Reputation: 2768
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikegal View Post
no, you said:



making it seem like they have to settle for someone not that great looking, bc they're getting older and "losing their looks" , not bc they've just naturally matured, want something else, and are no longer interested in just a hot guy, as I said.
I agree. Well, it all goes together. Hand in hand. The maturation process is part of acknowledging that we all have physical flaws, esp. as we age. At this point, priorities shift when we mature.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 08:23 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
20,393 posts, read 14,667,898 times
Reputation: 39487
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikegal View Post
that's good. and if you have a 'type', then that's understandable. I'm just confused sometimes, bc a lot of guys will act like or even say "I don't like fat girls"...and then they end up with one. I just find it weird that they're talking to me and are like "omg you're so hot"...then they end up with someone 2-3 times my size. that's what makes me think they just couldn't get someone else.
I see this as a human nature thing. A guy might meet you, and just simply not be feelin' it for you. And rather than feeling hurt as though you are not good enough, consider ALL the times you've ever met a man and for some ineffable reason you just...didn't feel a click there. Sometimes, that's just how it goes. But people feel some wacky compulsion to try and give some sort of a reason for their lack of attraction, which... Look, if there is something that someone could work on, to improve their odds in general, ok fine, finding a way to tell them diplomatically doesn't suck. But I don't think that anyone should have to justify their feelings by coming up with an acceptable excuse to not date someone else.

It's got to be ok to just...not be feeling it.

So dude's not into ya for some whatever reason. He SAYS he likes a different body type or something. Which leads us to the second thing... When you have not yet met the person you want to date, it's super easy to craft this imaginary human in your mind who is your perfect type. Or to say you are only wanting this or that kind of imaginary relationship.

But reality has a way of tossing us into situations where our rules go right out the window. You meet someone and even if they are not some "type" you thought you were looking for, you talk and it's amazing and you just connect. So she's overweight but that smile, that laugh, the sparkle in her eyes, something just gets you, and when people pay dedicated attention to one another it feels good, and before ya know it... Mr. "You aren't my type" is dating someone heavier that you are or whatever. Or my friend who swears she isn't looking for a "serious" relationship. Right, I wasn't either. Yet one found me. Over time, if you meet someone who is just RIGHT for you...you don't have to be pushing towards that as a life goal (and I think it's better if you're not.) It just evolves in that direction naturally.

All very human stuff.

I really think that online dating has made us put too much investment in a fantasy thing of the perfect person and the perfect relationship. I'm not saying that anyone should lower standards, have no standards, or especially ignore real red flags of definitely incompatibility. But we should try to be more realistic about what we really need to be happy and what is more of a "well it would be nice but it's not that important."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 08:38 AM
 
3,926 posts, read 2,035,856 times
Reputation: 2768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic_Spork View Post
I see this as a human nature thing. A guy might meet you, and just simply not be feelin' it for you. And rather than feeling hurt as though you are not good enough, consider ALL the times you've ever met a man and for some ineffable reason you just...didn't feel a click there. Sometimes, that's just how it goes. But people feel some wacky compulsion to try and give some sort of a reason for their lack of attraction, which... Look, if there is something that someone could work on, to improve their odds in general, ok fine, finding a way to tell them diplomatically doesn't suck. But I don't think that anyone should have to justify their feelings by coming up with an acceptable excuse to not date someone else.

It's got to be ok to just...not be feeling it.

So dude's not into ya for some whatever reason. He SAYS he likes a different body type or something. Which leads us to the second thing... When you have not yet met the person you want to date, it's super easy to craft this imaginary human in your mind who is your perfect type. Or to say you are only wanting this or that kind of imaginary relationship.

But reality has a way of tossing us into situations where our rules go right out the window. You meet someone and even if they are not some "type" you thought you were looking for, you talk and it's amazing and you just connect. So she's overweight but that smile, that laugh, the sparkle in her eyes, something just gets you, and when people pay dedicated attention to one another it feels good, and before ya know it... Mr. "You aren't my type" is dating someone heavier that you are or whatever. Or my friend who swears she isn't looking for a "serious" relationship. Right, I wasn't either. Yet one found me. Over time, if you meet someone who is just RIGHT for you...you don't have to be pushing towards that as a life goal (and I think it's better if you're not.) It just evolves in that direction naturally.

All very human stuff.

I really think that online dating has made us put too much investment in a fantasy thing of the perfect person and the perfect relationship. I'm not saying that anyone should lower standards, have no standards, or especially ignore real red flags of definitely incompatibility. But we should try to be more realistic about what we really need to be happy and what is more of a "well it would be nice but it's not that important."
Agreed! I have to say that the person the poster is speaking of, Im just guessing, they met in some organic fashion...likely in real life.

Online dating skews things tremendously.

For instance, for the many men women had ignored on online dating sites, chances are she could have passed up on THE ONE by skipping over them when just thumbing through it all. I think some women get so many emails they HAVE to skip heights or keep an eye out for certain buzz words, ie want kids, don't want kids, 5'10" or taller, likes Monty Python whatever lol

But I recall on the old POF forums how a guy who emailed a woman on there that ignored him (he didn't take it personal)...BUT later saw her in public and appraoched her THERE.

They hit it off tremondously!
About 5 dates in , he admitted that he knew her from online (didnt say anything in the beginning, held off)

She responded, "Wow, had I known you were THIS WAY, I would have replied!" So she basically ignored or turned away online, that could have made a good match for her in person. Chances are he was able to demonstrate his in-person social skills...a task very difficult or not possible demonstrate online.

This is why I could never really wrap my mind around those on these forums that prefer online dating over in person social gatherings...you know, the more normal way. But who am I to say what is "Normal" ..okay, replace 'normal" with nature or organic. )

Kind of reminds me of those 'missed connections" in the old classifieds, but kind of in reverse? A different take on them. lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
11,157 posts, read 14,006,045 times
Reputation: 14940
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikegal View Post
that's good. and if you have a 'type', then that's understandable. I'm just confused sometimes, bc a lot of guys will act like or even say "I don't like fat girls"...and then they end up with one. I just find it weird that they're talking to me and are like "omg you're so hot"...then they end up with someone 2-3 times my size. that's what makes me think they just couldn't get someone else.
Yeah that’s a little weird if they said they were into your appearance and then went in an entirely different direction. Also, some guys may claim not to like fat girls...until one gets ahold of them and gets him between the sheets! if I keep going down that refrain I’m going to get banned!

I could go on forever about the dating/relationship dynamic when plus size women are involved, but this is more a side bar to the main thread topic anyway, so I’ll leave it alone unless asked for more. Suffice to say it’s a topic that is extremely important to me though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
11,157 posts, read 14,006,045 times
Reputation: 14940
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThisTown123 View Post
Agreed! I have to say that the person the poster is speaking of, Im just guessing, they met in some organic fashion...likely in real life.

Online dating skews things tremendously.

For instance, for the many men women had ignored on online dating sites, chances are she could have passed up on THE ONE by skipping over them when just thumbing through it all. I think some women get so many emails they HAVE to skip heights or keep an eye out for certain buzz words, ie want kids, don't want kids, 5'10" or taller, likes Monty Python whatever lol

But I recall on the old POF forums how a guy who emailed a woman on there that ignored him (he didn't take it personal)...BUT later saw her in public and appraoched her THERE.

They hit it off tremondously!
About 5 dates in , he admitted that he knew her from online (didnt say anything in the beginning, held off)

She responded, "Wow, had I known you were THIS WAY, I would have replied!" So she basically ignored or turned away online, that could have made a good match for her in person. Chances are he was able to demonstrate his in-person social skills...a task very difficult or not possible demonstrate online.

This is why I could never really wrap my mind around those on these forums that prefer online dating over in person social gatherings...you know, the more normal way. But who am I to say what is "Normal" ..okay, replace 'normal" with nature or organic. )

Kind of reminds me of those 'missed connections" in the old classifieds, but kind of in reverse? A different take on them. lol
This is why I loved the cold approach and if I were ever thrust back into the dating arena would bet on myself over my online profile. I think the only advantage dating apps/OLD gives over cold approaching is you know who’s actually looking. It is hard to discern this when assessing in person if someone is open to being approached. Other than that, I like my chances in person far more than on a dating app.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top