Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-21-2009, 05:34 PM
 
3,853 posts, read 12,868,092 times
Reputation: 2529

Advertisements

Also the age of consent laws are rather archaic as well. Out here in CA the age of consent is 18 with a romeo & juliet window +/- 3 years. So anyone over age 21 is considered a rapist if they have sex with someone under 18, regardless of consent. These laws are archaic because they go directly AGAINST human instinct. Women are attracted to older men and men are attracted to younger women. The statistics show that:

3 of 4 births to High School girls are fathered by adults (men over 18).
Men over 25 account for twice as many teen births as boys under 18 years old.
Men over 20 are responsible for 5 times as many births among junior high school girls.
In California almost 70% of teen births are fathered by adult men.

So here we have a testosterone filled male (21-25) and then a bunch of young females who are interested in him. Anyone see something wrong with that? Making laws that are being thrown straight in the face of human nature and instinct. So now your average male is now a criminal because he was attracted to a girl who was 5 years younger than him.

We should make the age of consent at the age of puberty which usually finishes around age 13-14.

 
Old 01-21-2009, 05:37 PM
 
Location: St. Augustine, FL. & Austin, TX.
440 posts, read 1,682,425 times
Reputation: 331
Gotta say, I'm disgusted.
 
Old 01-21-2009, 05:39 PM
 
Location: Up above the world so high!
45,217 posts, read 100,739,056 times
Reputation: 40199
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer2021 View Post
Also the age of consent laws are rather archaic as well. Out here in CA the age of consent is 18 with a romeo & juliet window +/- 3 years. So anyone over age 21 is considered a rapist if they have sex with someone under 18, regardless of consent. These laws are archaic because they go directly AGAINST human instinct. Women are attracted to older men and men are attracted to younger women. The statistics show that:

3 of 4 births to High School girls are fathered by adults (men over 18).
Men over 25 account for twice as many teen births as boys under 18 years old.
Men over 20 are responsible for 5 times as many births among junior high school girls.
In California almost 70% of teen births are fathered by adult men.

So here we have a testosterone filled male (21-25) and then a bunch of young females who are interested in him. Anyone see something wrong with that? Making laws that are being thrown straight in the face of human nature and instinct. So now your average male is now a criminal because he was attracted to a girl who was 5 years younger than him.

We should make the age of consent at the age of puberty which usually finishes around age 13-14.

I thought for sure you HAD to be a troll, until I saw your post history...

There is too much wrong with your argument for me to even begin to address it, so suffice it to say - you are not only wrong, you are completely, utterly, without-a-doubt offensively disgustingly 110%, questionably pedophilialy DEAD wrong.

Last edited by lovesMountains; 01-21-2009 at 05:49 PM..
 
Old 01-21-2009, 05:42 PM
 
3,853 posts, read 12,868,092 times
Reputation: 2529
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovesMountains View Post
I thought for sure you HAD to be a troll, until I saw your post history...

There is too much wrong with your argument for me to even begin to address it, so suffice it to say - you are not only wrong, you are completely, utterly, without-a-doubt 110% DEAD wrong.
Really so you support a 21 year old male be tried for statutory rape who had consensual sex with his 17 year old girlfriend?

Also please stop trolling. Clearly this statement supports that fact:

Quote:
There is too much wrong with your argument for me to even begin to address it, so suffice it to say - you are not only wrong, you are completely, utterly, without-a-doubt 110% DEAD wrong.
 
Old 01-21-2009, 05:45 PM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,540,621 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer2021 View Post
Also the age of consent laws are rather archaic as well. Out here in CA the age of consent is 18 with a romeo & juliet window +/- 3 years. So anyone over age 21 is considered a rapist if they have sex with someone under 18, regardless of consent. These laws are archaic because they go directly AGAINST human instinct. Women are attracted to older men and men are attracted to younger women. The statistics show that:

3 of 4 births to High School girls are fathered by adults (men over 18).
Men over 25 account for twice as many teen births as boys under 18 years old.
Men over 20 are responsible for 5 times as many births among junior high school girls.
In California almost 70% of teen births are fathered by adult men.

So here we have a testosterone filled male (21-25) and then a bunch of young females who are interested in him. Anyone see something wrong with that? Making laws that are being thrown straight in the face of human nature and instinct. So now your average male is now a criminal because he was attracted to a girl who was 5 years younger than him.

We should make the age of consent at the age of puberty which usually finishes around age 13-14.
These laws are made to protect CHILDREN from adult preditors and any man over 21 sleeping with a girl under 18 is one and deserves to be labeled as such to protect his next victim. I don't care who is attracted to who. He's SUPPOSED to be an adult and needs to act like one. The only thing wrong with the law you stated is that it allows a 20 year old to sleep with a 17 year old. THAT IS wrong.

13 and 14 year olds don't have the sesne to know what they are consenting to. They aren't ready to handle the emotional aspects of being sexually active. I find it disgusting that any adult thinks they should be allowed to consent to sex with a, suposed, adult. That's just sick.
 
Old 01-21-2009, 05:45 PM
 
37,617 posts, read 46,006,789 times
Reputation: 57204
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer2021 View Post
We should make the age of consent at the age of puberty which usually finishes around age 13-14.
One of your more intelligent posts. NOT.

What a dork.
 
Old 01-21-2009, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Everybody is going to hurt you, you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for-B Marley
9,516 posts, read 20,005,830 times
Reputation: 9418
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer2021 View Post
Also the age of consent laws are rather archaic as well. Out here in CA the age of consent is 18 with a romeo & juliet window +/- 3 years. So anyone over age 21 is considered a rapist if they have sex with someone under 18, regardless of consent. These laws are archaic because they go directly AGAINST human instinct. Women are attracted to older men and men are attracted to younger women. The statistics show that:

3 of 4 births to High School girls are fathered by adults (men over 18).
Men over 25 account for twice as many teen births as boys under 18 years old.
Men over 20 are responsible for 5 times as many births among junior high school girls.
In California almost 70% of teen births are fathered by adult men.

So here we have a testosterone filled male (21-25) and then a bunch of young females who are interested in him. Anyone see something wrong with that? Making laws that are being thrown straight in the face of human nature and instinct. So now your average male is now a criminal because he was attracted to a girl who was 5 years younger than him.

We should make the age of consent at the age of puberty which usually finishes around age 13-14.
Bring back chastity belts!
 
Old 01-21-2009, 05:48 PM
 
3,853 posts, read 12,868,092 times
Reputation: 2529
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChessieMom View Post
One of your more intelligent posts. NOT.

What a dork.
You are assuming your average high schooler is a complete idiot void of any ability to rationally think for themselves. Most high school kids are having consensual sex and the statistics clearly demonstrate that. Just go to any high school dance and WATCH the way they dance.

Quote:
Bring back chastity belts!
hahah, yea because all of the other similar ideas (such as not teaching contraception) are working so great! Oh wait, aren't girls who don't learn about contraceptions more likely to get pregnant and contract an STD?
 
Old 01-21-2009, 05:51 PM
 
37,617 posts, read 46,006,789 times
Reputation: 57204
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer2021 View Post
You are assuming your average high schooler is a complete idiot
No...I am assuming YOU are.
 
Old 01-21-2009, 05:52 PM
 
Location: Alaska
5,356 posts, read 18,544,358 times
Reputation: 4071
Just because the statistics show what you state doesn't make it right. IMHO, girls in their young teens are not mature enough to know better and young adults will take advantage of it. Changing the consent laws would allow most cyber stalkers to get off when their only goal was to have sex with a minor.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top