Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-11-2022, 04:06 PM
 
1,655 posts, read 785,144 times
Reputation: 2042

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Give it up. You're rattling on with the same stuff over and over. You're not convincing us.

If you want to shrink your pool, go right ahead. Anyone can. That's their choice. It's your choice. It's not a damn result of you "bettering" yourself. It's a choice you're making.

That professor can decide intellectualism isn't a priority.

That trainer can decide how much a person weighs isn't a priority.

A well off person can decide they don't care how much a person earns or if they're good with their money.

Make your choices and own them. Trying to create some narrative that its natural or a person automatically limits themselves as they "better" themselves is hogwash. No one is "faulting" anyone.

You decided you want no fatties and people that work out. Great. Cool. Whatever.
Yes, I totally agree that as one feels they are bettering themselves it IS a choice if they hold the same areas of betterment in high regard for potential partners. That was the entire point of the thread.

One could probably draw parallels with addiction. Let’s say someone was a former alcoholic — would it really be too horrible if that person decides finding a partner that doesn’t drink is a quality they hold in high regards?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2022, 04:08 PM
 
1,655 posts, read 785,144 times
Reputation: 2042
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnazzyB View Post
It would not be the priority to me, that it seems to be for you.
But would you look negatively at someone who would admire that quality as basis for initial attraction?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2022, 04:10 PM
 
Location: Moreno Valley, Ca
4,050 posts, read 2,734,731 times
Reputation: 8479
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoAmericaGo View Post
Not really. In the real world people work toward personal goals and often try to find partners that share their vision. Like I said, being fit/health is like someone trying to be financially secure. A person who puts in the sacrifice and work to get ahead financially will often look for the same traits and goals in a partner. The person who’s on a path to retire at 55 could have long term compatibility issues with someone who lives paycheck to paycheck without even giving a passing thought about the future.

Sure
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2022, 04:12 PM
 
1,655 posts, read 785,144 times
Reputation: 2042
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlj1225 View Post
Sure
What exactly are you sarcastically disagreeing with?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2022, 04:17 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,178,375 times
Reputation: 40641
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoAmericaGo View Post
Yes, I totally agree that as one feels they are bettering themselves it IS a choice if they hold the same areas of betterment in high regard for potential partners. That was the entire point of the thread.
No, no it wasn't at all. You're moving goal posts, again.

I won't point out, again, how you're changing your arguments, AGAIN.

Lets just look at your opening last salvo:

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoAmericaGo View Post

The “less better” version of yourself could essentially have a much larger pool of people to pick from.


NO NO NO. Unless YOU DECIDE to have fewer choices, you won't. You have the same pool to pick from. Same pool. YOU ARE DECIDING not to. It's not a natural, or inevitable, or even usual end result of "bettering" oneself. It's a conscious decision to do so. And one anyone can make, whether they are "better" or not. A person who is overweight, or broke, or whatever can make the same limiting choices. It has NOTHING to do with "bettering" oneself.

Nothing about being "better" makes is harder to meet people. And nothing at all requires or even encourages a person who "bettered" themselves to change what they're looking for in potential partners. NOTHING.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2022, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Moreno Valley, Ca
4,050 posts, read 2,734,731 times
Reputation: 8479
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoAmericaGo View Post
What exactly are you sarcastically disagreeing with?
All of it. And the fact that you are trying to defend yourself and just going deeper into the hole. Many of us have been around here long enough to see right through you.

I'm done here. Good luck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2022, 04:24 PM
 
1,655 posts, read 785,144 times
Reputation: 2042
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
No, no it wasn't at all. You're moving goal posts, again.

I won't point out, again, how you're changing your arguments, AGAIN.

Lets just look at your opening last salvo:





NO NO NO. Unless YOU DECIDE to have fewer choices, you won't. You have the same pool to pick from. Same pool. YOU ARE DECIDING not to. It's not a natural, or inevitable, or even usual end result of "bettering" oneself. It's a conscious decision to do so. And one anyone can make, whether they are "better" or not. A person who is overweight, or broke, or whatever can make the same limiting choices. It has NOTHING to do with "bettering" oneself.

Nothing about being "better" makes is harder to meet people. And nothing at all requires or even encourages a person who "bettered" themselves to change what they're looking for in potential partners. NOTHING.
I really don’t see what your argument is anymore.

And sure being “better” could make it harder for some people to meet people if they prioritize finding someone with similar traits/goals. If someone tries to stay fit, educated, financially secure, mentally healthy, spiritual etc — prioritizing those qualities in a partner will inevitably shrink their dating pool. Yes, that is a conscious decision — just like someone wanting children may make the conscious decision to only be in relationships with people that also want children.

That’s just how dating works.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2022, 04:25 PM
 
1,655 posts, read 785,144 times
Reputation: 2042
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlj1225 View Post
All of it. And the fact that you are trying to defend yourself and just going deeper into the hole. Many of us have been around here long enough to see right through you.

I'm done here. Good luck.
Like what exactly? I think you are being overly negative for no reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2022, 04:30 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,178,375 times
Reputation: 40641
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoAmericaGo View Post
I really don’t see what your argument is anymore.

And sure being “better” could make it harder for some people to meet people if they prioritize finding someone with similar traits/goals. If someone tries to stay fit, educated, financially secure, mentally healthy, spiritual etc — prioritizing those qualities in a partner will inevitably shrink their dating pool.

That’s just how dating works.
My argument is you're moving goal posts and changing your "argument" every other page.
You contradict yourself regularly.

That' in a addition to being straight up wrong.

Someone can prioritize whatever they want in others whether they better themselves or not. It has nothing to do with bettering themselves.

They can better themselves and not prioritize the same thing in others. Because they didn't think to or choose to or heck, it would never cross their mind.

That's not "how dating works". That's how YOU work and you want it to be normal for everyone.

Too bad. You need to learn to just speak for you.

Me losing 40# or so from my peak. More than doubling my income. Obtaining more degrees. Buying a home. Etc. over the years. Hasn't changed one little thing I look for in others. Why would it? I've looked for chemistry, people who are kind, are fun, and that I'm attracted to and hit it off with.

A damn checklist never entered into it, nevermind changing my "standards" for others after I "bettered" myself.

The entire notion is pretty absurd. Once again, it screams "I've never been in love".

And I note you don't answer questions about your age, or dating experience. My guess is very strongly that your very young and this is very conceptual for you as it rings to lacking experience.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2022, 04:33 PM
 
5,796 posts, read 3,285,201 times
Reputation: 14783
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoAmericaGo View Post
But would you look negatively at someone who would admire that quality as basis for initial attraction?

Are you really asking if I would judge YOU for having that priority? I really don't know.


You seem to place a high priority on physical appearance. It's important to YOU. OK. So be it. I think the issue a lot of people are having is that you seem to attach a...morality to it. Like to justify yourself but yet judge others. I think that's where a lot of us are at odds with you.


Do I care that physical attraction is important to you. No. Not at all. Do I care that you seem to want to imply that there's a moral high ground to your outlook? Well...I find that a tad offensive. But in the grand life scheme...your beliefs don't have any kind of impact on my life...so....I don't know. Carry on Garth.
+
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top