Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I originally posted this in Health related forum and it gained absolutely no traction. I figured I would try again here since there is always way more traffic in relationships boards. Basically, I am trying to see if there are any patterns as far as marital and circumcision statuses.
I have a strange theory but testing it in real life would be rather problematic due to lack of anonymity. I would definitely not be comfortable asking this everyone I know.
A silly exercise perhaps, but at the same time - hey, its the internet forum, right? Lets limit this to US population of 23+
I'm failing to see what on earth a man's relationship status has to do with whether or not he has his foreskin.
That circumcised men get all the ladies, er, wives? I mean, this does make sense only for the fact that, statistically, in the U.S., the majority of married men (of marrying age) are circumcised because infant circumcision was routine practice during previous generations. The rates are lower in many areas now, so in a few decades there will be a more equal number of uncircumcised married men in the U.S.
But I still don't see what he's getting at by asking. Like, what's the point in this discussion?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.