Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-23-2018, 10:29 AM
 
Location: Portsmouth, VA
6,509 posts, read 8,453,043 times
Reputation: 3822

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mango tango View Post
I'll try to explain my question coherently enough so that I don't get too many weird/angry/passive aggressive responses!

I've met some very successful men in their given career and one thing I've always noticed is that (with the exception of one who's wife is a lawyer) their female counterparts - while always very lovely, engaging, and smart - aren't exactly career driven.

This makes me question whether or not one bustling and powerful career is the limit for a relationship?

Is it possible that successful men don't want to feel threatened by their significant other's career so they choose a girl (or boy, for all you politically correct people out there) that isn't swiftly ascending the career ladder?

Thoughts, opinions, statements - anyone? Bueller?
I wouldn't necessarily say that.

I've known successful women to marry men that weren't ambitious. I've even known women who weren't initially ambitious, start to make moves and their man doesn't, and maybe they were in a similar situation together when they first got married. It takes all kinds.

Were I a successful man I would want a woman that could challenge me intellectually, academically, creatively, etc. That does not necessarily translate into a woman with her own wealth.

Then again you have no control over who you fall in love with. Ambitious could be as simple as a woman working in entertainment making strides, does not necessarily have to be an academic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-23-2018, 10:49 AM
 
902 posts, read 747,198 times
Reputation: 2717
It is dangerous for a man to marry down. According to family courts, they will have to pay to maintain their spouses 'lifestyle' after a divorce. Only marry equal or above!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 03:27 PM
 
1,178 posts, read 685,300 times
Reputation: 1187
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
women like to marry up, the explanation is painfully clear if you spend a day in family court.
Wow.

You sound like a peach of a guy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 03:42 PM
 
1,201 posts, read 803,632 times
Reputation: 3188
Quote:
Originally Posted by mango tango View Post
I'll try to explain my question coherently enough so that I don't get too many weird/angry/passive aggressive responses!

I've met some very successful men in their given career and one thing I've always noticed is that (with the exception of one who's wife is a lawyer) their female counterparts - while always very lovely, engaging, and smart - aren't exactly career driven.

This makes me question whether or not one bustling and powerful career is the limit for a relationship?

Is it possible that successful men don't want to feel threatened by their significant other's career so they choose a girl (or boy, for all you politically correct people out there) that isn't swiftly ascending the career ladder?

Thoughts, opinions, statements - anyone? Bueller?
Men marry less successful woman ALL THE TIME. Hello - trophy wife?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 08:38 PM
 
100 posts, read 59,526 times
Reputation: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by mango tango View Post

Is it possible that successful men don't want to feel threatened by their significant other's career so they choose a girl (or boy, for all you politically correct people out there) that isn't swiftly ascending the career ladder?
Nah. It's much simpler than that. Men like to be the providers. They need to be needed. And, once upon a time, women liked being provided for and liked needing a man. It was very common, until feminism came along, for women to keep a hope a chest. It was filled with items passed down by grandmothers and mothers to unmarried young women. Dresses, tableclothes and linens, dishware, basically things to start off the "making a home" process. Upon marriage, the young woman would take the hope chest with her to her new home and eventually pass items down to her daughter. And so it went. And there was some form of this process as far back in history as has been recorded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2018, 08:44 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
814 posts, read 759,979 times
Reputation: 750
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocky1975 View Post
It is dangerous for a man to marry down. According to family courts, they will have to pay to maintain their spouses 'lifestyle' after a divorce. Only marry equal or above!


sounds more like womens motto lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top