Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-02-2009, 03:50 PM
 
20,728 posts, read 19,377,191 times
Reputation: 8293

Advertisements

My wife knows more about it than I do and knew it was on. I suppose I understand why she takes an interest. After seeing Hugh Jackman, playing a mutant, kick some foul thing into a a crumbling abyss, I was briefly stunned at the image of masculine display. I figure its like that.

I did see some healthy looking women. Even the hair in the middle of the back consistently says I have the health to grow such unbroken locks. How many did I find ideal? 1. A lonely number. She was also at the low range meaning don't even think about dropping 2 more pounds. Is this image of beauty a full employment act for surgeons performing C-sections? Victoria Secrete is now another infested hive of androgynous influences to please those who like a little boyishness. Is Hugh Hefner our only hope?


Don't get me wrong. Its not like I wouldn't want to share a seat on a long train ride with these lofty creatures. Go ahead and lean in if you need a nap. However it is because they are otherwise specimens of perfect health albeit it not quite architecturally sound something akin to a master sculptor's student not pounding in the gold leaf lief with the assiduous grace of the master. Heck I might even let Hugh Jackman have a seat so long as he leans away at nap time.

I like women that look like baby factories who can blacken the sky with dirty smokestacks. These look light industrial .

Last edited by gwynedd1; 12-02-2009 at 04:00 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-02-2009, 04:14 PM
 
Location: Denver Metro
1,549 posts, read 2,584,534 times
Reputation: 1131
I don't like your approach or your word choice, but I do like that you embrace curves so I wil give you that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2009, 04:44 PM
 
Location: SoCal - Sherman Oaks & Woodland Hills
12,974 posts, read 33,970,410 times
Reputation: 10491
I missed the event but saw some of the backstage stuff on the Fashion HD Network. I must admit, that their models seem to be of lesser quality stock this year. VS has always shined brightly because they always used models with a bit more sexiness and curviness to them like Tyra, Klum, Alessandra Ambrosio, Adriana Lima, etc. The ones I got to see really looked like standard high fashion runway models (i.e., very pretty faces and relatively thin bodies). Not emaciated thin, but standard run-of-the-mill runway "hangers" type models.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2009, 06:03 PM
 
Location: NY metro area
7,796 posts, read 16,405,624 times
Reputation: 10808
I was disappointed this year. I think Doutzen Kroes has one of the better figures out of all the girls. The girls definitely looked thinner this year, not that I wouldn't mind having any of their bods. (Watching this "event" isn't ideal for a pregnant woman. )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2009, 06:38 AM
 
Location: North Carolina
6,777 posts, read 13,558,304 times
Reputation: 6585
What was Victoria secreting? LOL.

Strange that you complain about women looking like little boys, but then say the one you were attracted to was super skinny?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2009, 06:45 AM
 
37,626 posts, read 46,035,471 times
Reputation: 57241
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
I did see some healthy looking women. Even the hair in the middle of the back consistently says I have the health to grow such unbroken locks.
Seriously?? Wow.

That was one odd post buddy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2009, 06:46 AM
 
37,626 posts, read 46,035,471 times
Reputation: 57241
Quote:
Originally Posted by sophialee View Post
What was Victoria secreting? LOL.
Ha! I was thinking the same thing!! Ick!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2009, 10:11 AM
 
Location: SoCal - Sherman Oaks & Woodland Hills
12,974 posts, read 33,970,410 times
Reputation: 10491
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
I did see some healthy looking women. Even the hair in the middle of the back consistently says I have the health to grow such unbroken locks.
Extensions. One of the cameras panned on the dressing area backstage and saw hair extensions lining the tables.

Seriously, I dont know what Victoria's Secret was thinking this year in getting those models whithout curves. Again, they werent super skinny, but their were definitely not sexy as in the models they have used in the past.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2009, 10:27 AM
 
Location: I never said I was perfect so no refunds here sorry!
6,489 posts, read 7,184,457 times
Reputation: 29855
I opted not to watch and don't feel like I missed a thing!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2009, 05:37 PM
 
Location: CA
3,467 posts, read 8,146,668 times
Reputation: 4841
Ugh, I'm so tired of the whining against thin women. Models are thin to sell clothes to women, they're not a big conspiracy to change what men think is sexy. And those individual women you insultingly call "boyish" are PEOPLE. Big hips and boobs do not make you a woman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top