Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2010, 11:02 AM
 
Location: The Hall of Justice
25,901 posts, read 42,673,439 times
Reputation: 42769

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WyoNewk View Post
Makes sense to me, Julia. I see living together as a good way to test your compatibility. It's not foolproof, but it lets you see the other person more like you'd see him/her as a spouse. If you split during that period of time it probably saved you from an unhappy marriage or divorce.

It's too easy to look at survey results and find the right answer to the wrong question. It seems most surveys are written to get specific answers -- to "prove" a point. I don't trust most survey results.
I agree. Studies and statistics can be easily manipulated to say what we want them to say.

You bring up a good point, which I highlighted above in red. I don't fully agree with it, but prompts the question, "How is success measured?" As has been discussed in other threads, the rate of divorce is going down (it's not the 50% that is so often heard!), but so is the rate of marriage. Cohabitation plays a part of this, I'm sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2010, 11:03 AM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,658,457 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by max's mama View Post
Dude - nobody had called you names. Do you even read your own posts before posting them? You are very rude. Very rude and condescending. In fact in this relationship forum, I haven't encountered such rudeness in a long time. People who disagree with you are hyper-sensitive, close-minded, and etc... Almost every one of your posts have an "eye-rolling" smiley, almost everyone of your posts have insults. This shows a very weak, condescending character on your part. You are the one who is calling people names, I suggest you go back and re-read this thread, because you don't seem to have a clear picture of how you are corresponding with us here. After I came back to this thread and finished reading it, I started to feel really sorry for you.

If these statistics are so important to you, we are not in the position to argue. These are your values and if this is the information you rely on to guide you, that's fine. Have a Happy New Year.
And this coming from an extremely rude, argumentative person.

Facts are facts - and they point to the fact that you, because you lived with your boyfriend before marrying him - are at a higher risk of divorce. THAT is why YOU are going ballistic about this.

Nevermind that I have repeatedly wished you well in your marriage. You're just pissed because somebody has cited facts and statistics - and a lot of them, by the way - that you don't like. You've offered no evidence to the contrary. None. You just stick your fingers in your ears and keep repeating that data, statistics and facts mean nothing.

Weird. Just weird.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 11:06 AM
 
Location: South FL
9,444 posts, read 17,374,699 times
Reputation: 8075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaha Rocks View Post
And this coming from an extremely rude, argumentative person.

Facts are facts - and they point to the fact that you, because you lived with your boyfriend before marrying him - are at a higher risk of divorce. THAT is why YOU are going ballistic about this.

Nevermind that I have repeatedly wished you well in your marriage. You're just pissed because somebody has cited facts and statistics - and a lot of them, by the way - that you don't like. You've offered no evidence to the contrary. None. You just stick your fingers in your ears and keep repeating that data, statistics and facts mean nothing.

Weird. Just weird.
Nobody is pissed because these statistics do not affect anyone here personally.
Okay, I tried to bring some sense to you, but it's not working, so I'll just stop trying. As my husband says: "you can only work with the workable".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 11:07 AM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,658,457 times
Reputation: 3925
This thread is hilarious - in a perverted and pathetic sort of way.

One guy steps up and cites statistics, studies and facts that PROVE that living together before marriage makes divorce more likely.


And all but one or two of the members is just flat-out pissed, and goes ballistic about it. There has been NO evidence given to support the claim that living together before marriage is BETTER. Nope, just a lot of screaming and yelling and fact-ignoring.


I'm beginning to wonder if the Relationships Forum needs to be re-named the "We Need Therapy Forum." The behavior of the majority of the people in this thread has indicated that that would be a more appropriate name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 11:09 AM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,658,457 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by max's mama View Post
Nobody is pissed because these statistics do not affect anyone here personally.
Okay, I tried to bring some sense to you, but it's not working, so I'll just stop trying. As my husband says: "you can only work with the workable".
You're right. Being closed-minded, and getting angry about facts is SO much better than actually thinking, reading and pondering points that are contrary to your pre-conceived notions.

Thank you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 11:11 AM
 
Location: North Carolina
6,777 posts, read 13,544,348 times
Reputation: 6585
I think it's pretty apparent that people who live together before marriage (or at least w/ multiple people b4 they marry) have a higher risk of divorce, BUT I don't think that's really why they have a higher rate of divorce.

Bear w/ me here for a minute. ...I think the reason behind the lower divorce rate is that many times they probably have deep religious and/or moral views regarding divorce and marriage, which is probably why they chose to not live together in the first place!

It doesn't mean their marriage is better tho, just that they are still married.

I could be wrong, but most of the people, no ALL of the people that I know that did not cohabitate b4 marriage w/ their spouse or anybody else also do not believe in divorce as an option (i.e they are morally opposed to it). i think that may have a lot to do w/ it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 11:12 AM
 
628 posts, read 2,043,727 times
Reputation: 524
I don't know--I would say it's about even from people I have observed in my peer group (I am 27) the divorces of did not live together vs. lived together--if there is a higher number of divorces in the lived together set it's only because I know more people in the lived together set.

I would think that part of the reason is that living together is generally acceptable now except by the extremely religious. Generally the extremely religious would not walk away as easily from a marriage (as to them it could mean eternal fire--not just legal proceedings)--
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 11:24 AM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,658,457 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by sophialee View Post
I think it's pretty apparent that people who live together before marriage (or at least w/ multiple people b4 they marry) have a higher risk of divorce, BUT I don't think that's really why they have a higher rate of divorce.

Bear w/ me here for a minute. ...I think the reason behind the lower divorce rate is that many times they probably have deep religious and/or moral views regarding divorce and marriage, which is probably why they chose to not live together in the first place!

It doesn't mean their marriage is better tho, just that they are still married.

I could be wrong, but most of the people, no ALL of the people that I know that did not cohabitate b4 marriage w/ their spouse or anybody else also do not believe in divorce as an option (i.e they are morally opposed to it). i think that may have a lot to do w/ it.
You're right. And that is exactly what I've mentioned in previous posts.

Success in marriage is about many things, as is failure in marriage. Not just one.

What is helpful is for people to examine what's driving the fact that living together before marriage increases the likelihood of divorce. It is NOT helpful for people to just start screaming that it isn't true, or attacking the person who states that fact. And that is about all that has happened on this thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 11:25 AM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,658,457 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by girlbuffalo1 View Post
I don't know--I would say it's about even from people I have observed in my peer group (I am 27) the divorces of did not live together vs. lived together--if there is a higher number of divorces in the lived together set it's only because I know more people in the lived together set.

I would think that part of the reason is that living together is generally acceptable now except by the extremely religious. Generally the extremely religious would not walk away as easily from a marriage (as to them it could mean eternal fire--not just legal proceedings)--
I believe you're probably correct about the extremely religious. But I wonder if their reluctance to walk away from a bad marriage might just mean they invest in saving it, rather than seeking divorce.


Regarding your personal peer group, that observation is certainly worth noting. It's just that we need to look at the bigger pictures too - and that's what the studies and statistics do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 11:28 AM
 
Location: South FL
9,444 posts, read 17,374,699 times
Reputation: 8075
Quote:
Originally Posted by sophialee View Post
I think it's pretty apparent that people who live together before marriage (or at least w/ multiple people b4 they marry) have a higher risk of divorce, BUT I don't think that's really why they have a higher rate of divorce.

Bear w/ me here for a minute. ...I think the reason behind the lower divorce rate is that many times they probably have deep religious and/or moral views regarding divorce and marriage, which is probably why they chose to not live together in the first place!

It doesn't mean their marriage is better tho, just that they are still married.

I could be wrong, but most of the people, no ALL of the people that I know that did not cohabitate b4 marriage w/ their spouse or anybody else also do not believe in divorce as an option (i.e they are morally opposed to it). i think that may have a lot to do w/ it.
I agree with you. This is not about living together, it's the type of demographics that would decide to live together prior to marriage in the first place. It's direct correlation between religion/moral views and divorce rates.
The so called statistics do not show why these couples decided to live together and the reasons behind it. That's why I say that those statistics should be taken with a grain of salt only and shouldn't guide anyone's decisions.

Nobody refuses the numbers per say, but when it comes to relationships, it can get so skewed and so inaccurate, that ultimately it cannot possibly considered as the guide to decision making. It's not like buying a car, where everything is black and white.
That's why I find this argument so strange as to why someone would be so passionate about such topic and not only that, completely not see anyone else's opinion as anything valuable as to why people don't take such statistics seriously. Mind-boggling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top