Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Predictable. Tom assures us that, since it denigrates an obvious scam, even though it's absolutely a Christian website, it's not to be trusted.
Why didn't I see that one coming? Oh wait: I did! Tom's nothing if not predictable.
This website confirms the obvious, and again, Tom, this thread, which I started (It's MINE I tell you!) is specifically about the claims made by what has turned out to be an evangelical scam.
To Wit: NAMI has vanished from the circuit; it folded it's tent and stole off into the night, just like those old circuses of old who left after "taking" the locals the night before, and then they arrive, furious, with pitch-forks and torches in hand, only to find an abandoned lot.
The nefarious departees did, however, leave their toilet pits. Well thanks!
And if your link is from an absolute Christian web site. What Christian ministry is it associated with riflemen?
And if you beleve it's author is an absolute Christian, why does he not believe the Biblical account? And what kind of Christian might that be riflemen? LOL
And for you to suggest that Yuen now concedes that their discovery is bogus, this requires you to believe only what the author of the link has stated. And we already know, this author does not believe the Biblical account. And I don't recall any words spoken by Yuen saying his discovery was bogus. I just see what the author of the link said Yuen conceded. Where is the actual transcrip riflemen?
Oh that's right, your a man of science. You don't need any real evidence. Especially when it comes to dismissing evidence that supports the Biblical account. Just wave your hand, I guess that's all the evidence you need.
And if your link is from an absolute Christian web site. What Christian ministry is it associated with riflemen?
And if you beleve it's author is an absolute Christian, why does he not believe the Biblical account? And what kind of Christian might that be riflemen? LOL
He may well, but he also allows that this is a prime example of evangelical archeological scammery, especially when one of the principles admits it. You missed that part, huh?
He also looks at it logically, rationally, something you do not.
And for you to suggest that Yuen now concedes that their discovery is bogus, this requires you to believe only what the author of the link has stated.
Yeah, well ,you use bogus links and quote-minig on a regualr basis. Now comes someone who makes logical points, and you'd rather not liisten? Typical.
Oh that's right, your a man of science. You don't need any real evidence. Especially when it comes to dismissing evidence that supports the Biblical account. Just wave your hand, I guess that's all the evidence you need.
Actually,m I prefer it when the scammers admit their scam, as is the case here. QED, case closed, tom.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
