Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Just to decide which famous individuals of science, philosophy, etc. are to be thought of as atheist without self-claiming. Does the new atheist since Obama's cadency believe in the possibility of non-survival of the human species? Did the old atheist always have to believe that it was not normal to think for science in anyway proving the demise of the human species?
I KNOW I'm not alone on this one. That is the one of decrying the earth for religious justification for the Oil industry , the threats and innuendoes of important bureaucrats, and questioning atheism for preferring to stress the death of the cold war.
Last edited by tgnostic; 02-16-2011 at 06:28 AM..
Reason: ading condition of judgement for the anti-semitism swindle.
Just to decide which famous individuals of science, philosophy, etc. are to be thought of as atheist without self-claiming. Does the new atheist since Obama's cadency believe in the possibility of non-survival of the human species? Did the old atheist always have to believe that it was not normal to think for science in anyway proving the demise of the human species?
I KNOW I'm not alone on this one. That is the one of decrying the earth for religious justification for the Oil industry , the threats and innuendoes of important bureaucrats, and questioning atheism for preferring to stress the death of the cold war.
I still wish I could understand your posts. At all. I think I get what you are trying to say, but then there is the Obama thing, and it's hard to know how to respond.
Curious, what language are you actually writing in? Your translation software is doing a poor job of translating it into anything that makes any sense at all.
As for the survival of the species, we like most other species that have lived and died out on this little rock, have a limited time here. If we don't self annihilate ourselves, something else will, be it a microbe or a meteorite.
just to decide which famous individuals of science, philosophy, etc. Are to be thought of as atheist without self-claiming. Does the new atheist since obama's cadency believe in the possibility of non-survival of the human species? Did the old atheist always have to believe that it was not normal to think for science in anyway proving the demise of the human species?
I know i'm not alone on this one. That is the one of decrying the earth for religious justification for the oil industry , the threats and innuendoes of important bureaucrats, and questioning atheism for preferring to stress the death of the cold war.
In America you no longer believe in environmental threat to the planet. And the democratic values of a generalized non-ideological concern are for that sort of conscience; they have nothing to do with the supposed progress in bull work of profit and job satisfaction for the greedy and futile.
Not, you too, Georgiafrog. Just exercising my personal right to comment on the state of the economy, here.
You were talking about the economy???????????? I think you need to try some different translation software, as that sure got lost in the translation.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
