Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-25-2011, 06:24 PM
 
86 posts, read 136,361 times
Reputation: 149

Advertisements

The bible has contradictions all over the place! It contradicts itself, meaning there are obvious fabrications. To say "Well gee whiz... we have some ruins, some tombs, some old bones of individuals named in the bible so it all must be true, every word of it even!" is absolute hogwash.


101 Contradictions In The Bible

1.Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel?
(a) God did (2 Samuel 24: 1)
(b) Satan did (I Chronicles 2 1:1)
2.In that count how many fighting men were found in Israel?
(a) Eight hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9)
(b) One million, one hundred thousand (IChronicles 21:5)
3. How many fighting men were found in Judah?
(a) Five hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9)
(b) Four hundred and seventy thousand (I Chronicles 21:5)
4.God sent his prophet to threaten David with how many years of famine?
(a) Seven (2 Samuel 24:13)
(b) Three (I Chronicles 21:12)
5.How old was Ahaziah when he began to rule over Jerusalem?
(a) Twenty-two (2 Kings 8:26)
(b) Forty-two (2 Chronicles 22:2)
6.How old was Jehoiachin when he became king of Jerusalem?
(a) Eighteen (2 Kings 24:8)
(b) Eight (2 Chronicles 36:9)
7.How long did he rule over Jerusalem?
(a) Three months (2 Kings 24:8)
(b) Three months and ten days (2 Chronicles 36:9)
8.The chief of the mighty men of David lifted up his spear and killed how many men at one time?
(a) Eight hundred (2 Samuel 23:8)
(b) Three hundred (I Chronicles 11: 11)
9.When did David bring the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem? Before defeating the Philistines or after?
(a) After (2 Samuel 5 and 6)
(b) Before (I Chronicles 13 and 14)
10.How many pairs of clean animals did God tell Noah to take into the Ark?
(a) Two (Genesis 6:19, 20)
(b) Seven (Genesis 7:2). But despite this last instruction only two pairs went into the ark (Genesis 7:8-9)
11.When David defeated the King of Zobah, how many horsemen did he capture?
(a) One thousand and seven hundred (2 Samuel 8:4)
(b) Seven thousand (I Chronicles 18:4)
12.How many stalls for horses did Solomon have?
(a) Forty thousand (I Kings 4:26)
(b) Four thousand (2 chronicles 9:25)
13.In what year of King Asa's reign did Baasha, King of Israel die?
(a) Twenty-sixth year (I Kings 15:33 - 16:8)
(b) Still alive in the thirty-sixth year (2 Chronicles 16:1)
14.How many overseers did Solomon appoint for the work of building the temple?
(a) Three thousand six hundred (2 Chronicles 2:2)
(b) Three thousand three hundred (I Kings 5:16)
15.Solomon built a facility containing how many baths?
(a) Two thousand (1 Kings 7:26)
(b) Over three thousand (2 Chronicles 4:5)
16.Of the Israelites who were freed from the Babylonian captivity, how many were the children of
Pahrath-Moab?
(a) Two thousand eight hundred and twelve (Ezra 2:6)
(b) Two thousand eight hundred and eighteen (Nehemiah 7:11)
17.How many were the children of Zattu?
(a) Nine hundred and forty-five (Ezra 2:8)
(b) Eight hundred and forty-five (Nehemiah 7:13)
18.How many were the children of Azgad?
(a) One thousand two hundred and twenty-two (Ezra 2:12)
(b) Two thousand three hundred and twenty-two (Nehemiah 7:17)
19.How many were the children of Adin?
(a) Four hundred and fifty-four (Ezra 2:15)
(b) Six hundred and fifty-five (Nehemiah 7:20)
20.How many were the children of Hashum?
(a) Two hundred and twenty-three (Ezra 2:19)
(b) Three hundred and twenty-eight (Nehemiah 7:22)
21.How many were the children of Bethel and Ai?
(a) Two hundred and twenty-three (Ezra 2:28)
(b) One hundred and twenty-three (Nehemiah 7:32)
22.Ezra 2:64 and Nehemiah 7:66 agree that the total number of the whole assembly was 42,360. Yet the
numbers do not add up to anything close. The totals obtained from each book is as follows:
(a) 29,818 (Ezra)
(b) 31,089 (Nehemiah)
23.How many singers accompanied the assembly?
(a) Two hundred (Ezra 2:65)
(b) Two hundred and forty-five (Nehemiah 7:67)
24.What was the name of King Abijah’s mother?
(a) Michaiah, daughter of Uriel of Gibeah (2 Chronicles 13:2)
(b) Maachah, daughter of Absalom (2 Chronicles 11:20) But Absalom had only one daughter whose name
was Tamar (2 Samuel 14:27)
25.Did Joshua and the Israelites capture Jerusalem?
(a) Yes (Joshua 10:23, 40)
(b) No (Joshua 15:63)
26.Who was the father of Joseph, husband of Mary?
(a) Jacob (Matthew 1:16)
(b) Hell (Luke 3:23)
27.Jesus descended from which son of David?
(a) Solomon (Matthew 1:6)
(b) Nathan (Luke3: 31)
28.Who was the father of Shealtiel?
(a) Jechoniah (Matthew 1:12)
(b) Neri’ (Luke 3:27)
29.Which son of Zerubbabel was an ancestor of Jesus Christ?
(a) Abiud (Matthew 1: 13)
(b) Rhesa (Luke 3:27) but the seven sons of Zerubbabel are as follows: i. Meshullam, ii. Hananiah, iii.
Hashubah, iv. Ohel, v. Berechiah, vi. Hasadiah, viii. Jushabhesed (I Chronicles 3:19, 20). The names
Abiud and Rhesa do not fit in anyway.
30.Who was the father of Uzziah?
(a) Joram (Matthew 1:8)
(b) Amaziah (2 Chronicles 26:1)
31.Who as the father of Jechoniah?
(a) Josiah (Matthew 1:11)
(b) Jeholakim (I Chronicles 3:16)
32.How many generations were there from the Babylonian exile until Christ?
(a) Matthew says fourteen (Matthew 1:17)
(b) But a careful count of the generations reveals only thirteen (see Matthew 1: 12-16)
33.Who was the father of Shelah?
(a) Cainan (Luke 3:35-36)
(b) Arphaxad (Genesis II: 12)
34.Was John the Baptist Elijah who was to come?
(a) Yes (Matthew II: 14, 17:10-13)
(b) No (John 1:19-21)
35.Would Jesus inherit David’s throne?
(a) Yes. So said the angel (Luke 1:32)
(b) No, since he is a descendant of Jehoiakim (see Matthew 1: I 1, I Chronicles 3:16). And Jehoiakim was
cursed by God so that none of his descendants can sit upon David’s throne (Jeremiah 36:30)
36.Jesus rode into Jerusalem on how many animals?
(a) One - a colt (Mark 11:7; cf Luke 19:3 5). “And they brought the colt to Jesus and threw their
garments on it; and he sat upon it.”
(b) Two - a colt and an ass (Matthew 21:7). “They brought the ass and the colt and put their garments
on them and he sat thereon.”
37.How did Simon Peter find out that Jesus was the Christ?
(a) By a revelation from heaven (Matthew 16:17)
(b) His brother Andrew told him (John 1:41)
38.Where did Jesus first meet Simon Peter and Andrew?
(a) By the Sea of Galilee (Matthew 4:18-22)
(b) On the banks of river Jordan (John 1:42). After that, Jesus decided to go to Galilee (John 1:43)
39.When Jesus met Jairus was Jairus’ daughter already dead?
(a) Yes. Matthew 9:18 quotes him as saying, “My daughter has just died.”
(b) No. Mark 5:23 quotes him as saying, “My little daughter is at the point of death.”
40.Did Jesus allow his disciples to keep a staff on their journey?
(a) Yes (Mark6: 8)
(b) No (Matthew 10:9; Luke 9:3)
41.Did Herod think that Jesus was John the Baptist?
(a) Yes (Matthew 14:2; Mark 6:16)
(b) No (Luke 9:9)
42.Did John the Baptist recognize Jesus before his baptism?
(a) Yes (Matthew 3:13-14)
(b) No (John 1:32,33)
43.Did John the Baptist recognize Jesus after his baptism?
(a) Yes (John 1:32, 33)
(b) No (Matthew 11:2)
44.According to the Gospel of John, what did Jesus say about bearing his own witness?
(a) “If I bear witness to myself, my testimony is not true” (John 5:3 1)
(b) “Even if I do bear witness to myself, my testimony is true” (John 8:14)
45.When Jesus entered Jerusalem did he cleanse the temple that same day?
(a) Yes (Matthew 21:12)
(b) No. He went into the temple and looked around, but since it was very late he did nothing. Instead, he
went to Bethany to spend the night and returned the next morning to cleanse the temple (Mark I 1:1-
17).
46.The Gospels say that Jesus cursed a fig tree. Did the tree wither at once?
(a) Yes. (Matthew 21:19)
(b) No. It withered overnight (Mark II: 20)
47.Did Judas kiss Jesus?
(a) Yes (Matthew 26:48-50)
(b) No. Judas could not get close enough to Jesus to kiss him (John 18:3-12)
48.What did Jesus say about Peter’s denial?
(a) “The **** will not crow till you have denied me three times” (John 13:38).
(b) “Before the **** crows twice you will deny me three times” (Mark 14:30). When the **** crowed
once, the three denials were not yet complete (see Mark 14:72). Therefore prediction (a) failed.
49.Did Jesus bear his own cross?
(a) Yes (John 19:17)
(b) No (Matthew 27:31-32)
50.Did Jesus die before the curtain of the temple was torn?
(a) Yes (Matthew27: 50-5 1;MarklS: 37-38)
(b) No. After the curtain was torn, then Jesus crying with a loud voice, said, “Father, into thy hands I
commit my spirit!” And having said this he breathed his last (Luke 23:45-46)
51.Did Jesus say anything secretly?
(a) No. “I have said nothing secretly” (John 18:20)
(b) Yes. “He did not speak to them without a parable, but privately to his own disciples he explained
everything” (Mark 4:34). The disciples asked him “Why do you speak to them in parables?” He said, “To
you it has been given to know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been given”
(Matthew 13: 1 0-11)
52.Where was Jesus at the sixth hour on the day of the crucifixion?
(a) On the cross (Mark 15:23)
(b) In Pilate’s court (John 19:14)
53.The gospels say that two thieves were crucified along with Jesus. Did both thieves mock Jesus?
(a) Yes (Mark 15:32)
(b) No. One of them mocked Jesus, the other defended Jesus (Luke 23:43)
54.Did Jesus ascend to Paradise the same day of the crucifixion?
(a) Yes. He said to the thief who defended him, “Today you will be with me in Paradise” (Luke 23:43)
(b) No. He said to Mary Magdelene two days later, “I have not yet ascended to the Father” (John 20:17)
55.When Paul was on the road to Damascus he saw a light and heard a voice. Did those who were with him hear the voice?
(a) Yes (Acts9: 7)
(b) No (Acts22: 9)
56.When Paul saw the light he fell to the ground. Did his traveling companions also fall to the ground?
(a) Yes (Acts 26:14)
(b) No (Acts 9:7)
57.Did the voice spell out on the spot what Paul’s duties were to be?
(a) Yes (Acts 26:16-18)
(b) No. The voice commanded Paul to go into the city of Damascus and there he will be told what he must do. (Acts9: 7; 22: 10)
58.When the Israelites dwelt in ****tin they committed adultery with the daughters of Moab. God struck them with a plague. How many people died in that plague?
(a) Twenty-four thousand (Numbers 25:1 and 9)
(b) Twenty-three thousand (I Corinthians 10:8)
59.How many members of the house of Jacob came to Egypt?
(a) Seventy souls (Genesis 4&27)
(b) Seventy-five souls (Acts 7:14)
60.What did Judas do with the blood money he received for betraying Jesus?
(a) He bought a field (Acts 1: 18)
(b) He threw all of it into the temple and went away. The priests could not put the blood money into the
temple treasury, so they used it to buy a field to bury strangers (Matthew 27:5)
61.How did Judas die?
(a) After he threw the money into the temple he went away and hanged himself (Matthew 27:5)
(b) After he bought the field with the price of his evil deed he fell headlong and burst open in the middle
and all his bowels gushed out (Acts 1:18)
62.Why is the field called “Field of Blood”?
(a) Because the priests bought it with the blood money (Matthew 27:8)
(b) Because of the bloody death of Judas therein (Acts 1:19)
63.Who is a ransom for whom?
(a) “The Son of Man came...to give his life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45). “Christ Jesus who gave
himself as a ransom for all... “(I Timothy 2:5-6)
(b) “The wicked is a ransom for the righteous, and the faithless for the upright” (Proverbs 21:18)
64.Is the Law of Moses useful?
(a) Yes. “All scripture is... profitable...” (2 Timothy 3:16)
(b) No. “ . . . A former commandment is set aside because of its weakness and uselessness... “(Hebrews
7:18)
65.What was the exact wording on the cross?
(a) “This is Jesus the King of the Jews” (Matthew 27:37)
(b) “The King of the Jews” (Mark 15:26)
(c) “This is the King of the Jews” (Luke 23:38)
(d) “Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews” (John 19:19)
66.Did Herod want to kill John the Baptist?
(a) Yes (Matthew 14:5)
(b) No. It was Herodias, the wife of Herod who wanted to kill him. But Herod knew that he was a
righteous man and kept him safe (Mark 6:20)
67.Who was the tenth disciple of Jesus in the list of twelve?
(a) Thaddaeus (Matthew 10: 1-4; Mark 3:13 -19)
(b) Judas son of James is the corresponding name in Luke’s gospel (Luke 6:12-16)
68.Jesus saw a man sit at the tax collector’s office and called him to be his disciple. What was his name?
(a) Matthew (Matthew 9:9)
(b) Levi (Mark 2:14; Luke 5:27)
69.Was Jesus crucified on the daytime before the Passover meal or the daytime after?
(a) After (Mark 14:12-17)
(b) Before. Before the feast of the Passover (John 1) Judas went out at night (John 13:30). The other
disciples thought he was going out to buy supplies to prepare for the Passover meal (John 13:29). When
Jesus was arrested, the Jews did not enter Pilate’s judgment hail because they wanted to stay clean to
eat the Passover (John 18:28). When the judgment was pronounced against Jesus, it was about the sixth
hour on the day of Preparation for the Passover (John 19:14)
70.Did Jesus pray to The Father to prevent the crucifixion?
(a) Yes. (Matthew 26:39; Mark 14:36; Luke 22:42)
(b) No. (John 12:27)
71.In the gospels which say that Jesus prayed to avoid the cross, how many times did ‘he move away
from his disciples to pray?
(a) Three (Matthew 26:36-46 and Mark 14:32-42)
(b) One. No opening is left for another two times. (Luke 22:39-46)
72.Matthew and Mark agree that Jesus went away and prayed three times. What were the words of the second prayer?
(a) Mark does not give the words but he says that the words were the same as the first prayer (Mark
14:3 9)
(b) Matthew gives us the words, and we can see that they are not the same as in the first (Matthew
26:42)
73.What did the centurion say when Jesus dies?
(a) “Certainly this man was innocent” (Luke 23:47)
(b) “Truly this man was the Son of God” (Mark 15:39)
74.When Jesus said “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken Me? ” in what language did he speak?
(a) Hebrew: the words are “Eloi, Eloi…“(Matthew 27:46)
(b) Aramaic: the words are “Eloi, Eloi... “(Mark 15:34)
75.According to the gospels, what were the last words of Jesus before he died?
(a) “Father, into thy hands I commit my spirit!” (Luke 23:46)
(b) "It is finished" (John 19:30).
76.When Jesus entered Capernaum he healed the slave of a centurion. Did the centurion come personally
to request Jesus for this?
(a) Yes (Matthew 8:5)
(b) No. He sent some elders of the Jews and his friends (Luke 7:3,6)
77. (a) Adam was told that if and when he eats the forbidden fruit he would die the same day (Genesis
2:17)
(b) Adam ate the fruit and went on to live to a ripe old age of 930 years (Genesis 5:5)
78. (a) God decided that the life span of humans will be limited to 120 years (Genesis 6:3)
(b) Many people born after that lived longer than 120. Arpachshad lived 438 years. His son Shelah lived
433 years. His son Eber lived 464 years, etc. (Genesis 11:12-16)
79.Apart from Jesus did anyone else ascend to heaven?
(a) No (John 3:13)
(b) Yes. “And Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven” (2 Kings 2:11)
80.Who was high priest when David went into the house of God and ate the consecrated bread?
(a) Abiathar (Mark 2:26)
(b) Ahimelech, the father of Abiathar (I Samuel 1:1; 22:20)
81.Was Jesus’ body wrapped in spices before burial in accordance with Jewish burial customs?
(a) Yes and his female disciples witnessed his burial (John 19:39-40)
(b) No. Jesus was simply wrapped in a linen shroud. Then the women bought and prepared spices “so
that they may go and anoint him [Jesus)” (Mark 16: 1)
82.When did the women buy the spices?
(a) After “the Sabbath was past” (Mark 16:1)
(b) Before the Sabbath. The women “prepared spices and ointments.” Then, “on the Sabbath they rested according to the commandment” (Luke 23:55 to 24:1)
83.At what time of day did the women visit the tomb?
(a) “Toward the dawn” (Matthew 28: 1)
(b) “When the sun had risen” (Mark 16:2)
84.What was the purpose for which the women went to the tomb?
(a) To anoint Jesus’ body with spices (Mark 16: 1; Luke 23:55 to 24: 1)
(b) To see the tomb. Nothing about spices here (Matthew 28: 1)
(c) For no specified reason. In this gospel the wrapping with spices had been done before the Sabbath
(John 20: 1)
85.A large stone was placed at the entrance of the tomb. Where was the stone when the women arrived?
(a) They saw that the stone was “Rolled back” (Mark 16:4) They found the stone “rolled away from the
tomb” (Luke 24:2) They saw that “the stone had been taken away from the tomb” (John 20:1)
(b) As the women approached, an angel descended from heaven, rolled away the stone, and conversed
with the women. Matthew made the women witness the spectacular rolling away of the stone (Matthew
28:1-6)
86.Did anyone tell the women what happened to Jesus’ body?
(a) Yes. “A young man in a white robe” (Mark 16:5). “Two men ... in dazzling apparel” later described as
angels (Luke 24:4 and 24:23). An angel - the one who rolled back the stone (Matthew 16:2). In each
case the women were told that Jesus had risen from the dead (Matthew 28:7; Mark 16:6; Luke 24:5
footnote)
(b) No. Mary met no one and returned saying, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not
know where they have laid him” (John 20:2)
87.When did Mary Magdelene first meet the resurrected Jesus? And how did she react?
(a) Mary and the other women met Jesus on their way back from their first and only visit to the tomb.
They took hold of his feet and worshipped him (Matthew 28:9)
(b) On her second visit to the tomb Mary met Jesus just outside the tomb. When she saw Jesus she did
not recognize him. She mistook him for the gardener. She still thinks that Jesus’ body is laid to rest
somewhere and she demands to know where. But when Jesus said her name she at once recognized him
and called him “Teacher.” Jesus said to her, “Do not hold me...” (John 20:11 to 17)
88.What was Jesus’ instruction for his disciples?
(a) “Tell my brethren to go to Galilee, and there they will see me” (Matthew 2 8: 10)
(b) “Go to my brethren and say to them, I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and
your God” (John 20:17)
89.When did the disciples return to Galilee?
(a) Immediately, because when they saw Jesus in Galilee “some doubted” (Matthew 28:17). This period
of uncertainty should not persist
(b) After at least 40 days. That evening the disciples were still in Jerusalem (Luke 24:3 3). Jesus
appeared to them there and told them, stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high”
(Luke 24:49). He was appearing to them “during forty days” (Acts 1:3), and “charged them not to depart
from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise ... “(Acts 1:4)
90.To whom did the Midianites sell Joseph?
(a) “To the Ishmaelites” (Genesis 37:28)
(b) “To Potiphar, an officer of Pharaoh” (Genesis 37:36)
91.Who brought Joseph to Egypt?
(a) The Ishmaelites bought Joseph and then “took Joseph to Egypt” (Genesis 37:28)
(b) “The Midianites had sold him in Egypt” (Genesis 37:36)
(c) Joseph said to his brothers “I am your brother, Joseph, whom you sold into Egypt” (Genesis 45:4)
92.Does God change his mind?
(a) Yes. “The word of the Lord came to Samuel: “I repent that I have made Saul King...” (I Samuel 15:10
to 11)
(b) No. God “will not lie or repent; for he is not a man, that he should repent” (I Samuel 15:29)
(c) Yes. “And the Lord repented that he had made Saul King over Israel” (I Samuel 15:35). Notice that
the above three quotes are all from the same chapter of the same book! In addition, the Bible shows that
God repented on several other occasions:
i. “The Lord was sorry that he made man” (Genesis 6:6)
“I am sorry that I have made them” (Genesis 6:7)
ii. “And the Lord repented of the evil which he thought to do to his people” (Exodus 32:14).
iii. (Lots of other such references).
93.The Bible says that for each miracle Moses and Aaron demonstrated the magicians did the same by
their secret arts. Then comes the following feat:
(a) Moses and Aaron converted all the available water into blood (Exodus 7:20-21)
(b) The magicians did the same (Exodus 7:22). This is impossible, since there would have been no water
left to convert into blood.
94.Who killed Goliath?
(a) David (I Samuel 17:23, 50)
(b) Elhanan (2 Samuel 21:19)
95.Who killed Saul?
(a) “Saul took his own sword and fell upon it.... Thus Saul died... (I Samuel 31:4-6)
(b) An Amalekite slew him (2 Samuel 1:1- 16)
96.Does every man sin?
(a) Yes. “There is no man who does not sin” (I Kings 8:46; see also 2 Chronicles 6:36; Proverbs 20:9;
Ecclesiastes 7:20; and I John 1:810)
(b) No. True Christians cannot possibly sin, because they are the children of God. “Every one who
believes that Jesus is the Christ is a child of God. (I John 5:1). “We should be called children of God; and
so we are” (I John 3: 1). “He who loves is born of God” (I John 4:7). “No one born of God commits sin;
for God’s nature abides in him, and he cannot sin because he is born of God” (I John 3:9). But, then
again, Yes! “If we say we have no sin we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us” (I John 1:8)
97.Who will bear whose burden?
(a) “Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ” (Galatians 6:2)
(b) “Each man will have to bear his own load” (Galatians 6:5)
98.How many disciples did Jesus appear to after his resurrection?
(a) Twelve (I Corinthians 15:5)
(b) Eleven (Matthew 27:3-5 and Acts 1:9-26, see also Matthew 28:16; Mark 16:14 footnote; Luke 24:9;
Luke 24:3 3)
99.Where was Jesus three days after his baptism?
(a) After his baptism, “the spirit immediately drove him out into the wilderness. And he was in the
wilderness forty days ... (Mark 1:12-13)
(b) Next day after the baptism, Jesus selected two disciples. Second day: Jesus went to Galilee - two more disciples. Third day: Jesus was at a wedding feast in Cana in Galilee (see John 1:35; 1:43; 2:1-11)
100.Was baby Jesus’ life threatened in Jerusalem?
(a) Yes, so Joseph fled with him to Egypt and stayed there until Herod died (Matthew 2:13 23)
(b) No. The family fled nowhere. They calmly presented the child at the Jerusalem temple according to the Jewish customs and returned to Galilee (Luke 2:21-40)
101.When Jesus walked on water how did the disciples respond?
(a) They worshipped him, saying, “Truly you are the Son of God” (Matthew 14:33)
(b) “They were utterly astounded, for they did not understand about the loaves, but their
hearts were hardened” (Mark 6:51-52)
[SIZE=3][/SIZE]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-25-2011, 06:45 PM
 
Location: Free State of Texas
20,441 posts, read 12,786,094 times
Reputation: 2497
Quote:
Originally Posted by ancient warrior View Post
Sorry. This is Luke's yarn, not Paul's. Read the Pauline writings.
So Luke fabricated Paul's quote in Acts 22 & 26?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 07:25 PM
 
86 posts, read 136,361 times
Reputation: 149
Default When I was young

Back when I was about 10 years old I had a paper route. Me and a few other guys would meet up at about 4:30-5 AM and load up our bikes to go deliver papers. I made friends with one of the guys that also had a paper route, Wayne... that's how we met.

Up to this point in my life I had been raised completely devoid of religion in any form although I was a 4.0 student and had literary and math skills beyond anyone else my age due to intense additional studies at home via my mother. I was invited to go to church with my friend Wayne and his family one day so I took them up on it. It was a southern Baptist church and oh BOY could I tell these people were heavy duty into this stuff! By about the 2nd week of going with them, the Pastor gave the ol' "Fire and brimstone burning in hell you vile sinner" speech! He gave a graphic lecture in which he described hell as a physical place (under evil Satan's leadership) and described it well enough that you would have thought he had gotten the guided tour of the place! He went on for about an hour or two and went into great details of Heaven, Hell, the pitfalls of hell, etc., etc. He topped it off with how if you just play your cards right, when you croak, you go to this other place that is the EXACT opposite of hell where all is wonderful and you get to hang out and have tea and crumpets with Jesus, etc., etc....

I was alarmed, devastated even! How had I not heard about all this before now if it was all so critical!!!! I went to my mother, just about crying and asked about this whole thing. She instructed me to not believe everything I hear at face value and to study extensively on my own, making an objective evaluation rather than being coerced into any belief system. Still quite alarmed, I read the bible and studied various religious outlooks for some years to try to come up with conclusions. The more I read and evaluated in detail, the more I came to realize that a whole lot of this just didn't add up and make sense and there was much that was either open to interpretations or flat out falsehoods that didn't pan out. There were also "differing views" of various religions that completely contradicted one another. Eventually and not without intense studies on the subject, I ended up going with the idea of religion as being "War and genocide throughout recorded history based on differing imaginary friends".

At this point in time all these years later, scientific studies and exploration, physical evidence, forensic evidence and empirical data all seem to show that the bible was written by mere mortal human beings who put together this book based on their very limited understanding of the universe around them at that period in history.

Organized religion even went out of their way to stifle and hold back scientific studies and advancement for as long as they possibly could for they feared it would undermine them or disprove them! When Galileo said, "Uhmm, gee guys... it really looks like earth is not the center of the universe and that it's a planet not unlike the other planets that orbit the sun" and put this in writing, he was immediately put under house arrest and told that if he did not retract his statement, he would be imprisoned, tortured or put to death for "Crimes against God"!

There were others, why just look up Hypatia of ancient Alexandria. She was a scholar, a mathematician and worse yet a WOMAN scholar whom the early Christian movement saw as a threat so she was brutally killed by a mob run by a guy who was later named a SAINT!hahaha PRAISE JESUS! Scientific advancement was seen as a threat to the absolute power that organized religion had at the time for fear it may come up with findings that would undermine them, so they dealt with these threats severely.


Now we know. The earth is not the center of the universe. As a matter of fact our entire solar system is but a tiny speck among billions of other stars and solar systems on the outskirts of one galaxy. Our one galaxy is but another tiny speck in a sea of galaxies, hundreds of billions of them! Our entire solar system is about 4.6 billion years old in a universe that is estimated to be over 14 billion years old. Not only is none of this information in the bible (as it would have been if God himself had a hand in writing this book, I mean, why would he leave this stuff out, right?) but the bible's account for the "beginnings" are completely different from what we now know for a fact to be true! No, the bible was obviously written by mortal human beings without any help from "divinity" because it lays things out in accordance with what man's concepts and levels of understanding of the world around us were at the time. If God created the universe specifically for man whom he created in his image, then what the heck is all that extra real estate for?

What if man's archaic beliefs that we humans are the sole "masters of the universe" since we have a "soul" and we were created in the image of a divinity by a divinity are completely false? What if other lifeforms are relatively prolific throughout the universe as the staggering mathematical logic of it all would dictate? We have proven that the "building blocks of life" are in fact free floating in space from analysis of meteorogical specimens. In our solar system it took 4.6 billion years to come up with a (somewhat) technologically advanced species (us)... but other places in the universe have had a considerable head start on us, leaving lots of options for other intelligent life in the universe. It becomes pretty clear that all is not what it seems or what is depicted in the bible and in the rhetoric of religion.

Had I written this post publicly just a few hundred years ago, I would have been burned at the stake.

Last edited by GavinC; 02-25-2011 at 08:03 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 08:10 PM
 
86 posts, read 136,361 times
Reputation: 149
Default Can't quote the bible on here because it is sin?

I just noticed the word "****" was autoedited when quoting the bible, as in referring to a male chicken/rooster! hahaha

c-o-c-k is a word in the bible! "Before the **** crows twice..."hahaha The religion of Confucious--- "Man who have hole in front pockets often feel cocky."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 09:15 PM
 
Location: East Coast U.S.
1,513 posts, read 1,624,420 times
Reputation: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
Clearly the response of someone who is stumped for an answer.
Keep dreaming.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
So perhaps you would explain just how you decide what is to be taken literally and what isn't. What set of special rules do you have that allow you to decide. Presumably you think that the flood and the 40 years are not to be taken literally but the crucifixion and resurrection are. How do you decided this? The Bible says, clearly and plainly that the desolation will last for 40 years. It says clearly and plainly that this will happen at the time of the Pharaohs and it says clearly and plainly that Nebby will be the instigator of the destruction.
"The Bible says, clearly and plainly..."

I don't disagree with this. However, my point has been that the study of hermeneutics involves much more than a simple reading of the various English versions and translations. This may come as a rather shocking surprise and admission, but in truth, the modern translations of the Bible represent a fallible facsimile of the original writings. In other words, God's word, in it's original form is infallible while man, being a fallible being, has left us with potentially fallible copies of the original infallible writings. This was demonstrated most notably upon the discovery of the Dead Sea scrolls. While the various discrepancies found were insignificant with respect to the contextual understanding communicated, they were still discrepancies nevertheless. Unfortunately for you and your fellow nay-saying skeptics, there has never been any archeological find that directly or indirectly contradicts the theological context of the canon of scripture.

My previous questions still stand: Are you credentialed in the study of Biblical hermeneutics? Are you schooled/trained in the intricacies of the original old Hebrew language? If not, then you obviously have no basis upon which to make any of your assertions. If you are, then the ball is still in your court and you are obliged to back up your assertions. I'm not a Bible expert nor do I claim to be one. You're the one who's jumped out here and presented yourself as the Bible expert - lead on maestro!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
I have given you the verifiable evidence that shows it never happened. It is not for me to keep presenting you with more and more evidence to prove what has already been proven. Now it is your turn to refute the evidence I have presented. You haven't done so because you can't. All you can do is keep claiming that various events that the Bible claims happened did not happen....that they are symbolic, metaphor, poetry or not to be taken literally. So, what I would like you to do is explain how the bible can be historical fact when various events described within it are symbolic, metaphor, poetry and not to be taken literally.
Rafius, I'm really and truly trying to be kind. However, if you insist, I'm perfectly willing and able to break this down for you, but be warned, it is 100% guaranteed to make you look like a complete fool.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
Then it is now up to YOU to explain why the chronology is wrong and tell us what date YOU think this flood was.
I never stated the chronology to be 'wrong,' I merely questioned why you assume it to be correct. You're the expert (term applied loosely) here, you tell me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
I have told you why it never happened. All you have to do is look at the recorded history of Egypt and that of her neighbours. It's now your turn to prove that written history wrong.
...and I don't claim to be a historian either. So far as I'm aware, in my capacity as a historical layman, there exists ample room for this prophecy to to have been literally fulfilled in a literal 40 year time period. You assert that this could never of happened. Fine, we have your opinion...why should anyone believe you?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
That is not 'presumption', it is written, recorded history. Your task is now to provide verifiable evidence that the recorded history of Egypt and her Pharaohs is incorrect.....but you can't can you.
You're barking up the wrong tree. I'm not the one who jumped out to make all the claims and assertions. You're the one making the claims and your apparent reluctance to provide logical reasons for making such claims speaks for itself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
You have so far ignored this question so I will ask you yet again. Please explain just how all life on the planet was wiped out if the flood was not global. If the flood was local please tell us just what allowed the water to build up so that all life in the area of the flood was wiped out...without the water running out to sea. Please explain why Noah was instucted to build a boat to save the world's animals if most of the world wasn't going to be affected by this flood. Have you ever been to the Middle East? I have and there is no ring of high mountains around the area to hold the water in. Please explain how it happened.
While I was under no obligation to explain, I very kindly did explain this and provided a link back in post #24. It's not that I necessarily agree with the writer of the article, I merely pointed out that there are other opinions beyond the traditional interpretation. By the way, the author of the article is a well credentialed scientist well schooled in Biblical hermeneutics and ancient Hebrew linguistics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
"Presumptions"???? No, recorded historical fact presented with supporting evidence..... which is something we are still waiting for from you.
...waiting for what? I haven't made any claims. All I've been doing is asking questions.

I never stated that they were necessarily wrong or mistaken. I simply asked how it is that you arrived at your apparent conclusion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
Ummmm! That's exactly what you are doing!!
Does anyone else besides me find it mildly irritating when a guy uses emoticons?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
You keep saying this but I clearly have backed up my claims that there was no global flood and that there was no 40 year period of Egyptian desolation. I have destroyed your claim that the desolation might be 'sometime in the future' and destroyed your claim that the flood was 'local' not global. It appears that you are the only one that can't see it.
Yeah. So how's life in 'la la land?'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
There is no need for me to defend this one. I think most people reading can see where the obstinate obfuscation tactics are coming from.
While I'm sure the 'reps' are pouring in from your fellow forum buddies, I'm afraid that I must burst your bubble by informing you that the only support is that of the proverbial choir you're singing to. It's really not too difficult to impress them, all that's required is for you to be in lock step. Well done!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 09:31 PM
 
Location: East Coast U.S.
1,513 posts, read 1,624,420 times
Reputation: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by GavinC View Post
The bible has contradictions all over the place!...
If you skeptics have such a great case against the Bible, why do so many of you automatically resort to the filibuster tactic?

Still, if you take a little time to study critical thinking and actually learn what a logical contradiction is, then you will realize that your so called '101' drops to zero.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 11:13 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,848,488 times
Reputation: 18304
Quote:
Originally Posted by fractured_kidult View Post
So, why is it that some people still think the bible is 100% fact? Most Christians think that the bible is a great historical reference, when in fact it is a terrible one.

Take Noah's flood? If the flood did happen when the bible said it did, explain Egypt? How was Egypt untouched?

There are so many things in the bible that the bible scholars still feel are accurate, but historical evidence proves otherwise.
You really thnik that writing by men are historia=cal facts? Look at the difference beteeen the different writting about ancient battles between the Egyptions and other. Even readig history written by different witnesses of recent history like WWII will aloow you to see that two people see the same thing different. In science most actually beleieve it on faith ;not proving it themselfs.Faith plays a bigger part in all belief than most think really. Often what we witness ourself is viewed with prejudice of our own. You are free to pcik and choose what you beleive but not to say you know ehen you don't i citizing others. Agrue but never say you know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2011, 11:38 PM
 
Location: Valencia, Spain
16,155 posts, read 12,857,175 times
Reputation: 2881
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eusebius View Post
Rafius, Paul said he saw the Lord, he heard His voice also. The men who were with him did not see the Lord. Why? His glory was too brilliant for them to see Him. Paul, however kept looking and indeed he saw the Lord though he was blinded by that brilliance until Ananias healed him.
Did they hear the voice or did they not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tigetmax24 View Post
I don't disagree with this. However, my point has been that the study of hermeneutics involves much more than a simple reading of the various English versions and translations. This may come as a rather shocking surprise and admission, but in truth, the modern translations of the Bible represent a fallible facsimile of the original writings.
How do you know? There are is no 'original' in existence.

Quote:
In other words, God's word, in it's original form is infallible while man, being a fallible being, has left us with potentially fallible copies of the original infallible writings.
Excellent! So as there is no original Bible in existence we can safely concluded that all copies of the Bible in existence today are fallible.

Quote:
This was demonstrated most notably upon the discovery of the Dead Sea scrolls. While the various discrepancies found were insignificant with respect to the contextual understanding communicated, they were still discrepancies nevertheless.
Further support for the fallibility of today's Bibles.

Quote:
Unfortunately for you and your fellow nay-saying skeptics, there has never been any archeological find that directly or indirectly contradicts the theological context of the canon of scripture.
To use your words "Keep dreaming."

Quote:
My previous questions still stand: Are you credentialed in the study of Biblical hermeneutics? Are you schooled/trained in the intricacies of the original old Hebrew language?
No I'm not. Neither am I a qualified mechanic but I sure as hell could fix your car for you.

Quote:
If not, then you obviously have no basis upon which to make any of your assertions. If you are, then the ball is still in your court and you are obliged to back up your assertions. I'm not a Bible expert nor do I claim to be one. You're the one who's jumped out here and presented yourself as the Bible expert - lead on maestro!
Why do you keep refusing to see what I have written (rhetorical question of course as I do know the answer to that one)? I have backed up my assertions and I'm waiting for you respond to them.

Quote:
Rafius, I'm really and truly trying to be kind. However, if you insist, I'm perfectly willing and able to break this down for you, but be warned, it is 100% guaranteed to make you look like a complete fool.
How? By giving me page after page of apologetics about symbolism, metaphor, interpretation and poetry and thus proving what I'm saying....that the Bible is not historical fact?

Quote:
I never stated the chronology to be 'wrong,' I merely questioned why you assume it to be correct.
Whether I believe it to be correct is irrelevant....Bible scholars have taken various details of what the bible says re people and places and have come up with that date. I will ask you again. If the date of approximately 2300 BCE is not corrrect then tell me when you think it happened.

Quote:
...and I don't claim to be a historian either. So far as I'm aware, in my capacity as a historical layman, there exists ample room for this prophecy to to have been literally fulfilled in a literal 40 year time period.
Then tell us when that would have been. Give us the historical dates for the desolation. Supply the evidence that there was a 40 year period when there was neither man nor animal to be found in Egypt. Supply the evidence that the Egyptians were scattered amongst the nations and then tell us when it was that this Hebrew god gathered all the Egyptians and returned them to Egypt.

Quote:
You assert that this could never of happened. Fine, we have your opinion...why should anyone believe you?
Is repetition of what has already been refuted and debunked all you have? It is not my 'opinion', it is the recorded, objective and verifiable history of Egypt and her neighbours that confirms what I have said. Please provide evidence that the recorded history of Egypt is incorrect.


Quote:
You're barking up the wrong tree. I'm not the one who jumped out to make all the claims and assertions. You're the one making the claims and your apparent reluctance to provide logical reasons for making such claims speaks for itself.
There you go again....claiming that no logical reasons have been giving to support my claims. All who read these threads can see that you are desperately clutching at ever smaller straws here. I have given you the verifiable evidence to support my claims which you have ignored throughout the thread. It makes you look rather desperate and foolish when you keep asking me to heap even more evidence on top of what has already been supplied.

Quote:
While I was under no obligation to explain, I very kindly did explain this and provided a link back in post #24. It's not that I necessarily agree with the writer of the article, I merely pointed out that there are other opinions beyond the traditional interpretation. By the way, the author of the article is a well credentialed scientist well schooled in Biblical hermeneutics and ancient Hebrew linguistics.
...and back we come to the symbolism, interpretation and metaphor. Such appeals only mean that you have traded the words of your for words more to your liking. You have disassembled the various words, books, verses and phrases, and then re-assembled them in a manner more to your liking. You might like their results better than the Bible, but that in no way makes their distortion a more accurate representation of what the Bible says than what the Bible actually says. You're confusing what you prefer, with what the Bible actually says. It's time to recognize that you don't like what it says. That's why you're so willing to trade for a complete distortion which says what you do like. You will keep appealling to 'hermeneutics', 'ancient Hebrew linguistics' and 'translation' until you have found an interpretation which pleases you and appeals to your sense of reason, but it's not what the book says.

People like you read their Bible, replace the Bible's words with their own, and then claim that's what the book says when it isn't. You simply assert that what the authors wrote and the interpreters documented is not what 'Biblegod' really meant. Then you step up and pretend to have editorial license on 'BibleGod's word"', and claim that your replacement for the statements in the book are more accurate than what was written there.

You present nothing more than "Christian Semantics" -- any word can be defined to mean anything at all that is convenient to attempt defend Bible stories and statements. "Day" can mean 24 hours or a million years – depending on "interpretation" of the "inerrant" scriptures by self-appointed "representatives".



Unfortunately for you, the rational thinkers on this board are not fooled. They see what you are doing.


Quote:
Yeah. So how's life in 'la la land?'
You should know!! Anyone that keeps arguing that the Bible today is full of discrepancies and says "the modern translations of the Bible represent a fallible facsimile of the original writings. In other words, God's word, in it's original form is infallible while man, being a fallible being, has left us with potentially fallible copies of the original infallible writings" and then argues that the Bible is historical fact....surely lives there himself!!

Last edited by Rafius; 02-25-2011 at 11:56 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2011, 01:11 AM
 
86 posts, read 136,361 times
Reputation: 149
Default Logical contradiction

Quote:
Originally Posted by tigetmax24 View Post
If you skeptics have such a great case against the Bible, why do so many of you automatically resort to the filibuster tactic?

Still, if you take a little time to study critical thinking and actually learn what a logical contradiction is, then you will realize that your so called '101' drops to zero.
One source says yes, one source says no... one or the other is incorrect, it is impossible for both to be correct= Logical

One source says 1000, another source says 5000 and yet another source says 15,000... two of the three are incorrect no matter how you dice it; It is impossible for all three to be correct=logical.

So, uhm... where does your "logical contradiction" perhaps via misinterpretation factor work out with such finite things that leave no room for varied interpretation?

You can't rationalize any of it can't explain it at all, so have to resort to calling it... the "fiflibuster tactic?" This goes beyond the realm of totally ridiculous--- This is no "tactic" at all, it's simply direct, exact quotes being compared to each other out of the official book!

Break it all down for us and explain away all the contradictions for us. I am truly anxious to hear your brand of logic (that doesn't seem to conform to any known standards of logical thought).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2011, 02:04 AM
 
86 posts, read 136,361 times
Reputation: 149
Default Common sense

Let's take a moment to step away from the logical factors and the scientific evidence factors that all add to up an overwhelming result and take a hard look at the geographical and common sense factor!

Interestingly enough, back in biblical times Christianity was only known to a particular geographical region, namely Europe and the Middle East. If almighty Jesus who was the son of God and could do miracles and had God backing him up with all this, why weren't they able to reach the Americas, where Native Americans had no knowledge of Jesus, had never read a bible had no concept of God in the manner that the Christians did? How about Australia who had only the aboriginies for a very long time before any whites ever came there? Nope... they never heard about Jesus until a white man came ashore waving a bible around at them! The truth is that many of these people had never seen a white man or some of the more advanced technology they had(at least compared to their own); They were unlike anything these people had ever seen or known of and some of these people even thought the white man WAS some sort of God THEMSELVES (at first)! They got their rude awakening once they got fully indoctrinated in Jesus... and then conquered.

Communication capabilities of God and Jesus should be miraculous and all that, correct? If Christianity was a man-made thing it would be limited to the geographical regions it could be spread to that were in contact with each other (often by force by the way, get in with Jesus or die by our hand because we are in good with Jesus).

Now if God and Jesus handled it all, well that's different! All the people's of the world would have had Jesus and God show up to them all about the same time as the capabilities of such miracle-performing beings could EASILY do, right? How could the internet, twitter and Facebook today have more communications capability worldwide than God and Jesus did back then, right?

Christianity spread by word of mouth, by a movement that gathered steam as it went. It essentially started as a small cult and grew, spreading rather quickly because to not convert to Christianity back in those days (or to whatever "powers that be") often meant bad things were going to happen to you! God and Jesus did not kill you for not going with the whole Jesus plan... mortal humans did as they were "doing God's work". The expansion of Christianity was however limited to the geographical regions it could spread to easily enough via the conventional means of mortal humans at the time.

After white Europeans started coming to the new world, the Americas they pushed it hard there also--- Why hadn't Jesus and God have already BEEN to the Americas and told Native Americans all about Jesus though????

That is unless you want to go with some of Joseph Smith's little twists on it all because he proclaimed the garden of eden was actually in Missouri and that God himself told him that! This adds to the contradiction factor though... and we are sticking with the common sense angle on this post.

Common sense tells us that obviously Facebook, Twitter, Satellite TV and modern communications mediums work much more efficiently than God and Jesus did "back in the day", which is odd because you wouldn't think that God and Jesus, who created and run the entire universe would have geographical obstacles in communications on one tiny little planet and that is something only mere mortal humans would find an obstacle during these time periods!

The truth is that geographical separations of humanity allowed for completely different belief systems to form in geographical regions isolated from one another that were completely foreign to each other. Man's curiosity and trying to make sense of the world around him, explain elements of nature in the world around him led to many varied unfounded, unproven theories that became bona fide religions over time, all with supernatural, mythical qualities about them because they lacked rational or scientific explanations of the world around them.

Last edited by GavinC; 02-26-2011 at 02:34 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:29 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top