Quote:
Originally Posted by achickenchaser
If you ask some people what's their religion, they'll say christian. But it really goes no further than that. It's something they claim to be by name only. I don't see much of a difference in the average christian and non-believers such as myself, really.
|
This is probably a bit of a carry-over from the earlier but sadder age of cultural abidence and social inertia, the sort of survey contamination that soiled the minds of our forefathers. You remember, when they
all claimed to be Christians, but of course were not. To make a claim of atheism or agnosticism back then would be to invite social scorn and derision
"...right here in Godlyville, USA!".
So now, many hopeful Christians try to sell the false idea that our entire country is thus based on Christian,
rather than common sense, reasons. And thus, they press on, we should enforce a Christian lifestyle on the greater population. Especially, since only, what, 0.7% of us, a truly insignificant amount, are ungoldy evil atheists! But equally oddly, we or our extroverted ungodly behavior, is
somehow "...directly responsible for our society's total moral decay! Kill the damned atheists! Burn their ungodly hides in the village square!"
What interesting [but statistically unsupportable...] conclusions, huh?
As well, some seem to think that a majority belief in some hair-brained idea somehow makes it correct. One's
personal spirituality is
hardly up for democratic vote. And as to one's personal belief, simply "knowing' there is a God is also not proof of His existence, just of
your determined belief, often in direct contradiction of all the accumulated evidence. Or more recently, all the scientific proofs of how things really happened back then, and still do. Like, you know, Evolution, geology, cosmology and a whole host of other "stuff".
But that's OK; we love statistical diversity in our population here in the US of A. That's what makes it great, if somewhat scientifically illiterate and poorly educated.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxcar Overkill
It entirely depends on how the sample is picked, you are correct about that. It must be either truely random or otherwise representative.
But the size of the sample is large for a study of this type. I suppose it has to be large to get a somewhat accurate number on the smaller sub-groups (like the estimated number of atheist.)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dewdrop93
I think it depends on how you pick the 54,000. The population of the United States is over 300,000,000.
|
Quite right, but for different reasons,
BoxCar &
DewDrop. I read an intriguing short dissertation a few years back about how even tallying a small percentage of the population can provide very accurate results, if the statistical set-up and the right questions are asked. But of course, given the sincere self-interest of the surveyors, the probability that a religious college would do an unbiased survey about religious beliefs is hard to believe.
Then again, even if 98%% of the entire US population believed with all their heart in the Southern Baptist version of Christ and God, so what? That only means that 98% of those asked are wrong. Simple, huh?