Quote:
Originally Posted by littlewitness
Resorting to constant ridicule of the truth of G-d's written word is a fools game.
|
No, the Fool's Game is claiming that Jesus is God and then saying "G-d" instead of Jesus.
Shouldn't it be J-s-s?
Or is Jesus not worthy of the same respect as "G-d?"
2 Kings 2:23 He [Elisha] went up from there to Bethel. As he was traveling up the road, some young boys came out of the city and made fun of him, saying, “Go on up, baldy! Go on up, baldy!” 2:24 When he turned around and saw them, he called upon Jesus to bring judgment down on them. Jesus sent two female bears came out of the woods and ripped forty-two of the boys to pieces.
Swell guy, that Jesus.
Gaming...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeMachine
Vizio, do you have a problem with the Cambrian explosion? I only ask becasuse if you do, I can't see you accepting such massive evolutiong after the ark.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio
How does that compare to the Cambrian explosion? For some unknown reason, evolutionists think there were all kinds of new species in a relative blink of an eye.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio
I fully agree with the idea that evolution is a load of bunk. Having said that, the strawman you posted earlier is a far cry from saying that evolution is not correct.
|
Also, according to Genesis 7:23
Only Noah and those who were with him in the ark survived...so that means Noah and his sons had...
Achondroplasia
Achromatopsia
Acid Maltase Deficiency
Adrenoleukodystrophy
Aicardi Syndrome
Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency
Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome
Apert Syndrome
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia
Ataxia Telangiectasia
Barth Syndrome
Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome
Canavan Disease
Cri Du Chat Syndrome
Cystic Fibrosis
Dercum's Disease
Ectodermal Dysplasia
Fanconi Anemia
Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
Fragile X Syndrome
Galactosemia
Gaucher Disease
Hemochromatosis
Hemophilia
Huntington's Disease
Hurler Syndrome
Hypophosphatasia
Klinefelter Syndrome
Krabbes Disease
Langer-Giedion Syndrome
Leukodystrophy
Long QT Syndrome
Marfan Syndrome
Moebius Syndrome
Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS)
Nail Patella Syndrome
Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus
Neurofibromatosis
Niemann-Pick Disease
Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Porphyria
Prader-Willi Syndrome
Progeria
Proteus Syndrome
Retinoblastoma
Rett Syndrome
Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome
Sanfilippo Syndrome
Shwachman Syndrome
Sickle Cell Disease
Smith-Magenis Syndrome
Stickler Syndrome
Tay-Sachs Disease
Thrombocytopenia Absent Radius (TAR) Syndrome
Treacher Collins Syndrome
Trisomy
Tuberous Sclerosis
Turner's Syndrome
Urea Cycle Disorder
von Hippel-Lindau Disease
Waardenburg Syndrome
Williams Syndrome
and Wilson's Disease to name just a handful, because those are all
genetic disorders. If you deny that Noah and his sons had those genetic disorders, then you have no choice but to admit that they EVOLVED. If you claim Noah and his sons did already have those genetic disorders, then your god is not very intelligent and his design is grotesquely flawed, not to mention the fact that there's no way Noah could have constructed an ark with those genetic disorders.
Exploding...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio
I've been wondering that myself. Why do non-religious folk feel compelled to come here?
|
To correct the false, deceiving and deceptive information that is presented by christians and others.
Correcting...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by TWD39
So do you have a complete fossil record showing every form of gradual change from our ape ancestor to modern man? Show me exactly how our voice box and mechanism for speech came about. Where's the proof? If not, then I do declare macroevolution is quite the unproven theory.
|
This would be a great example of biological/physiological ignorance.
For decades and decades it was assumed that
Homo Neanderthalensis was mute and could not speak, because there was no evidence of an hyoid bone. The hyoid bone is very small and very fragile, but it is very important, because it anchors the muscles at the back of the throat from the tongue and neck, and that is what allows speech.
It wasn't until the mid-1990s that we were fortunate enough to find skeletal remains of
Homo Neanderthalensis with an intact hyoid bone, and not just one skeleton, but what is believed to be a family.
The first place scavengers bite is the neck, because the tissue is soft and it accesses the main arteries providing blood, so the hyoid bone is one of the first things to be destroyed or go missing. These skeletons were protected in a cave, and they probably died during winter, which would allow the cold temperatures to mask the odor of decaying flesh from scavenging animals and help preserve them.
A sufficient number of older humanoids -- eg
Homo Ergaster, Homo Habilis, Homo Erectus -- have been found intact and demonstrated that they had no hyoid bone.
You also display a tremendous ignorance of "things statistical."
If 100% of all species were fossilized or otherwise preserved, then possibly your argument might have some merit, but that isn't the case.
Not every living humanoid in the past died in a fossilized/preserved state with a map-pin on GoogleEarth for us to find.
Add to that the fact that a large portion of the Earth is unsearchable, because it is underwater. We know for a fact the since 12,000 years ago, the sea levels have risen 600 ft to 800 ft (depending on the source(s) cited), so there are millions of square miles of land that we cannot search. Many communities would have located near seas and rivers, especially deltas, to take advantage of the abundant sources of food and water, and those areas are not underwater.
You're effectively demanding physical and documentary evidence for a charge of "Treason," when all that exists is testimonial evidence. The point being you have some rather high false expectations, but then you do believe in non-existent beings, so I guess I can at least credit you with being consistent.
Gradually...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by elamigo
Good point. There are some, including Christians, that do not believe it was a universal event. This means that if such event happened it may have been a local event that covered the writer's account in his world. As far as impossible, why? The account of a flood can be found in civilizations around the world in differing ways. However, what makes it impossible? Take care.
|
That's what I hate about religion: it destroys everything, and that which is not destroyed is perverted.
They are very close to the Truth now. It'll still be a few decades to tie the loose ends together.
When the end is known, you'll discover that a meteor swarm struck Earth; that impacts in Canada and along what is now the entire eastern US seaboard resulted in the minor extinction event at the Pliocene-Holocene Boundary; that these meteors were responsible for the destruction of the entire western ice sheet (Ross Sea/Ross Shelf); that they caused tsunamis to sweep across the Earth's oceans for 3-5 days; that these tsunamis deposited large volumes of sand in the Andes, the Himalayas and other mountain chains; that these tsunamis swept across northern China creating the Gobi Desert; that these tsunamis are responsible for every single mass grave on Earth containing thousands of skeletal remains of various animals, including animals not indigenous to their respective regions; that the same tsunamis which created the animal graveyards also deposited a variety of flora there as well, including flora not indigenous to the region; and that the greenhouse gases resultant from land-based meteor strikes in addition to the destruction of the western ice sheet and the introduction of large volumes of fresh water into the ocean current system hastened the onset of the present Inter-Glacial Period.
Those tsunamis caused by that meteor swarm are the basis of every "flood story" on every continent (save Antarctica).
Over time, as this event became distant memory, it resulted in conflicts among each of the many different groups of peoples on Earth, and so each responded to it in kind based on their own culture.
The source of the story for the Hebrews was older texts from Babylonia (Amorites), Sumer & Akkad. Being scientifically ignorant, the Hebrews had to reconcile the true events with their very limited knowledge, and the only way they were able to explain the event was by the act of a god. That begged the question "
Why would god do that?" which leads to the answer "
people were evil" but then some people survived, which begs the question "
How or why did they survive?" and so on.
Imagine being Japanese and having knowledge of an ancient event like the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Someone with a child-like mentality would reason that no man or thing could have caused it, so it must have been a god that killed those people; and why would he do that? Because god was angry. And why was god angry? Because the people were evil and wouldn't listen to god. And why did some people live? Because they were good people.
Dumb yourself down to the mind-set of a 3-year old and you can the world as the Hebrews did.
Realistically...
Mircea