Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-09-2013, 06:12 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,384,541 times
Reputation: 4113

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AgainstAllOdds View Post
It's something that I find shocking. The teenage pregnancies, the single parenthood, the high divorce rates... what is the cause of all this? I was amazed that promiscuity is encouraged and virginity is looked down on.

When i first came to here the first thing I noticed was the breakdown of the family unit. It just doesn't seem to be valued at all when it's the core of a healthy society. There is endless information about sex education and contraception.. and yet single parenthood and illegitimate births just keep rising.

The sexual revolution might have allowed people to be more free sexually, but at what price? What was the main cause of this moral deterioration?
So 'morals' are all about sex to you?

Interesting. I see discrimination, prejudice, bigotry, child abuse etc as immoral. And most of that seems to come from the religious right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-09-2013, 07:43 AM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
5,671 posts, read 4,352,826 times
Reputation: 2610
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaoistDude View Post
In part I attribute this not to morals (which are of questionable morality themselves these days - just look at Westboro Baptist for a clear example), but to individual selfishness and lack of a wider social consciousness and responsibility.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaoistDude View Post
Secular humanism will be what saves society, IMO, and will keep most Judeo-Christian values. But, they will be based on the original human traits which led to their invention in the first place. Things such as altruism and fairness which are basic to human nature when nurtured. God is a fiction - a superstition. Perhaps useful in its time when science was not around to explain the world, but now a hindrance to a unified view of humanity and human rights and goodness. God is a cause of divisiveness, not a source of unity.

I think we are in a transition period between failing old ideas and wonderful new paradigms of ethics. Revolutions are seldom tidy.
Right now the view of not caring what others think is on the rise. This is probably an adaptation to much of culture being based off traditions that aren't necessarily good for people. Everybody's supposed to get married, and have kids, and men are supposed to fear doctors and never go to them, and women are supposed to merrily do whatever their husbands tell them and never have a thought in their pretty little heads. I think that's what people are escaping from, so they ignore the peer pressure that might be healthy if society gave better guidance. (Although that peer pressure is still healthy in some ways even with society's poor guidance).

Ideally once culture adapts to something more useful, we'll go back that healthy the community raises the child way. People will begin trusting culture again (hopefully). I think we need more peer pressure in society, just good peer pressure.

Regarding the sexual revolution...evidently some women don't like the past because they weren't taken seriously, but they also don't like the present because potential mates expect sex after a solid 15 minutes of work/flattery.

...and as for the women who don't like sex...or like it less, but still want a relationship...they are no longer expected to sleep with their husbands anyway, by society, but who would date them if many people view sex as an ice breaker? It's like a handshake...a very, very friendly, handshake.

If anyone doesn't believe there are women who don't like the sexual revolution, go to the intimate relationships forum and start a thread about how proud you are about being a being a playa'. Women will swarm like piranhas and devour you. If you make a remark that the age of consent should be lowered to 16, you will probably be called a pedophile at least once.

Last edited by Clintone; 03-09-2013 at 08:53 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2013, 12:06 PM
 
Location: Nanaimo, Canada
1,807 posts, read 1,892,003 times
Reputation: 980
Quote:
Originally Posted by AgainstAllOdds View Post
There is endless information about sex education and contraception.. and yet single parenthood and illegitimate births just keep rising.

The sexual revolution might have allowed people to be more free sexually, but at what price? What was the main cause of this moral deterioration?
There's a saying I heard once: 'Just say 'no' prevents teenage pregnancy the way 'have a nice day' cures chronic depression'.

You can give all the sex-ed lessons you want, but in the end, it's up to the individual to accept what's offered. Some will take that to a logical extreme, and make the appropriate decisions, while others will take the approach of raw hedonism.

The sad truth is that, as advanced as we are (slowly) becoming culturally, when a choice is offered to a large enough group of people, about 75% of them will take the 'thrill me now, though it may kill me later' path. That's human nature, tragically, and there's only so much we can do to curb our natural impulses.

What's the main cause of the moral decay? Well......sometimes when you say 'no', they just want it all the more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2013, 04:41 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,384,541 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi View Post
It started with the so-called "Age of Enlightenment" when philosophers began to deny the existence of God. As society has progressively moved away from Judeo-Christian values toward secular humanism, morality has deteriorated to the reeking slime pit is today. Sodom may fare better in judgment. IMHO
You seem to have a fantasy view of history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2013, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Duluth, Minnesota, USA
7,639 posts, read 18,125,272 times
Reputation: 6913
Society has largely given up universal moral standards in favor of moral relativism on issues of sexuality. This devolution began with the acceptance of contraception and soon fornication, homosexuality, and promiscuous sex followed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2013, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Deep Dirty South
5,189 posts, read 5,335,772 times
Reputation: 3863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
You seem to have a fantasy view of history.
Seriously. As if immorality was something new. Humans have always, always engaged in things that many would consider immoral as well as committing real horrors and atrocities.

Pornography, hedonism, rape, incest, teen pregnancy, slavery, slaughter, genocide--all of these things have always been with us. Many such things are to be found in the religious scriptures of the world (including the Judeo-Christian ones) often actually conceived, ordered and endorsed by a god or gods themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2013, 09:46 AM
 
Location: 6st planet from Sun
328 posts, read 682,456 times
Reputation: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by findly185 View Post
"Morals" have become something that applies (or does not apply) on an individual basis. People are living life by their own standards. Not a list of standards decided by someone or something else.
If people were all a-moral, there would be no moral problem. That is where we are headed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2013, 09:47 AM
 
Location: Deep Dirty South
5,189 posts, read 5,335,772 times
Reputation: 3863
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvdxer View Post
Society has largely given up universal moral standards in favor of moral relativism on issues of sexuality. This devolution began with the acceptance of contraception and soon fornication, homosexuality, and promiscuous sex followed.
Again, this is baseless and absurd nonsense. Contraception, adultery, fornication, homosexuality, etc. have always, always been with us--a part of humanity and the human condition. Nothing new here.

I think it's hilarious, though, that you equate some of these things (i.e. contraception and homosexuality in particular) as "immoral."

How? Why? Based on ancient superstitious stories about some gods?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2013, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Duluth, Minnesota, USA
7,639 posts, read 18,125,272 times
Reputation: 6913
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griffis View Post
Again, this is baseless and absurd nonsense. Contraception, adultery, fornication, homosexuality, etc. have always, always been with us--a part of humanity and the human condition. Nothing new here.

I think it's hilarious, though, that you equate some of these things (i.e. contraception and homosexuality in particular) as "immoral."

How? Why? Based on ancient superstitious stories about some gods?
Existence does not imply acceptance. Contraception was widely disdained in 19th-century America, and only in the mid-20th century did most Christian churches change their view on it. Sodomy has been viewed as immoral since the Christianization of the West. Sure, these things were done in secret - but society looked down upon it and people often felt ashamed of themselves after doing such things.

Contraception is immoral because it selfishly separates the procreative and unitive aspects of sex, leading to a variety of social ills.

Homosexual acts are immoral because they are against the natural end of the sexual act.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2013, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
31,373 posts, read 20,184,822 times
Reputation: 14070
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvdxer View Post
Existence does not imply acceptance. Contraception was widely disdained in 19th-century America, and only in the mid-20th century did most Christian churches change their view on it. Sodomy has been viewed as immoral since the Christianization of the West. Sure, these things were done in secret - but society looked down upon it and people often felt ashamed of themselves after doing such things.

Contraception is immoral because it selfishly separates the procreative and unitive aspects of sex, leading to a variety of social ills.

Homosexual acts are immoral because they are against the natural end of the sexual act.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top