Evolution and population (gospel, bible, quotes, God)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Status:
"Apparently the worst poster on CD"
(set 20 days ago)
27,627 posts, read 16,108,044 times
Reputation: 19020
Advertisements
"The Evolutionary scientists who believe that man existed for over a million years have an almost insurmountable problem. Using the assumption of 43 years for an average human generation, the population growth over a million years would produce 23,256 consecutive generations. We calculate the expected population by starting with one couple one million years ago and use the same assumptions of a 43 year generation and 2.5 children per family...The evolutionary theory of a million years of growth would produce trillions trillions trillions trillions of people that should be alive today on our planet. To put this in perspective, this number is vastly greater than the total number of atoms in our vast universe."
"Researchers suggest that virtually all modern men-99% of them,says one scientist-are closely related genetically and share genes with one male ancestor, dubbed 'Y-chromosome Adam'
"We are finding that humans have very,very shallow genetic roots which go back very recently to one ancestor...That indicates that there was an origin in a specific location on the globe, and then it spread out from there"
U.S. News & World Report, 12/4/95
Funny, when I run a Google search on this article I only get four results and not surprisingly, they are all on Christian propaganda websites.
The "U.S. News & World Report" credit at the end is somewhat misleading. The text was taken from "The Signature of God" by Grant R Jeffrey, a book which has been shown to be full of errors and outright lies:
Gospel (scroll down to "The Signature of God by Grant R Jeffrey")
"Jeffrey makes great archaeological claims to confirm the Bible, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence which is lacking in his book. Jeffrey quotes from books printed in the 1800’s to make his extraordinary archaeological claims. These books are out of date. One should use the latest evidence. The problem is that the latest evidence shows how wrong he is. He needs to refer to specialists in the field to confirm his findings. There have been a number of big claims that have fizzled out after careful reevaluation. Let’s look at several examples."
Funny, when I run a Google search on this article I only get four results and not surprisingly, they are all on Christian propaganda websites.
The "U.S. News & World Report" credit at the end is somewhat misleading. The text was taken from "The Signature of God" by Grant R Jeffrey, a book which has been shown to be full of errors and outright lies:
Status:
"Apparently the worst poster on CD"
(set 20 days ago)
27,627 posts, read 16,108,044 times
Reputation: 19020
Quote:
Originally Posted by [QUOTE
Inigo_Montoya;1983141]Funny, when I run a Google search on this article I only get four results and not surprisingly, they are all on Christian propaganda websites.
Did you think you would find it on an evolutionist propaganda website?
Quote:
"Jeffrey makes great archaeological claims to confirm the Bible, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence which is lacking in his book. Jeffrey quotes from books printed in the 1800’s to make his extraordinary archaeological claims. These books are out of date. One should use the latest evidence. The problem is that the latest evidence shows how wrong he is. He needs to refer to specialists in the field to confirm his findings. There have been a number of big claims that have fizzled out after careful reevaluation. Let’s look at several examples."[/quote
]
You're quoting a Christian website?
Can you debunk the OP yourself without using google?
Inigo already has...you've just chosen to ignore it...as usual!
"Jeffrey quotes from books printed in the 1800’s to make his extraordinary archaeological claims. These books are out of date. One should use the latest evidence. The problem is that the latest evidence shows how wrong he is. He needs to refer to specialists in the field to confirm his findings. There have been a number of big claims that have fizzled out after careful re-evaluation."
Status:
"Apparently the worst poster on CD"
(set 20 days ago)
27,627 posts, read 16,108,044 times
Reputation: 19020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheguevara
Inigo already has...you've just chosen to ignore it...as usual!
"Jeffrey quotes from books printed in the 1800’s to make his extraordinary archaeological claims. These books are out of date. One should use the latest evidence. The problem is that the latest evidence shows how wrong he is. He needs to refer to specialists in the field to confirm his findings. There have been a number of big claims that have fizzled out after careful re-evaluation."
This says nothing about OP, why dont you give it a shot?
This says nothing about OP, why dont you give it a shot?
Au contraire! It says a great deal about the OP.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
