Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-03-2014, 05:58 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,377,437 times
Reputation: 4113

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glacierx View Post
99.5% of agreeing on something doesn't make it true ... or does it?



All but 0.01% of them are American. Hmm... funny, that. Do you think American scientists have some bit of information no one else has? Or, more likely, there is an awful lot of cutural[sic] bias at play here given America's embarrassingly abundant environmentalism.
It's interesting that David Legates is a member of the Creationists Evangelical Cornwall Alliance. BTW, the graphic you presented is based on an article that has been soundly rebutted:
http://link.springer.com/article/10....191-013-9608-3

I wonder if David Legates also denies Evolution?

A number of 'scientists' eg Roy Spencer, David Legates and others like Ross McKitrick (economist) - who are deniers or 'skeptics' of AGW are signatories to the Conservative Christian Cornwall Alliance "Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming" which states:
"We believe Earth and its ecosystems – created by God’s intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence – are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting, admirably suited for human flourishing, and displaying His glory. Earth’s climate system is no exception. Recent global warming is one of many natural cycles of warming and cooling in geologic history"

"We call on our fellow Christians to practice creation stewardship out of Biblical conviction, adoration for our Creator, and love for our fellow man—especially the poor.
We call on Christian leaders to understand the truth about climate change and embrace Biblical thinking..."
Cornwall Alliance :: Articles :: Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming
"Earth and all its subsystems—of land, sea, and air, living and nonliving—are the good products of the wise design and omnipotent acts of the infinite, eternal, and unchangeable Triune God of the Bible. As such they reveal God’s glory. Mankind, created in God’s image, is the crown of creation.

Human beings have the divine mandate to multiply and to fill, subdue, and rule the Earth, transforming it from wilderness into garden. They act as stewards under God to cultivate and guard what they subdue and rule. Calling them to be His vicegerents over the Earth, God requires obedience to His laws—in Scripture and imprinted in the human conscience—in their stewardship.

Although sin, universal among mankind, deeply mars this stewardship, God’s redemptive act in Jesus Christ’s death on the cross and His instructive activity through Scripture, communicating the nature of creation and human responsibility for it, enable people to create wealth and decrease poverty at the same time that they pursue creation stewardship and, even more important, the true spiritual wealth of knowing their Creator through Jesus Christ.

The Biblical worldview contrasts sharply with the environmentalist worldview—whether secular or religious—in many significant ways..."
Cornwall Alliance :: Articles :: Renewed Call to Truth

Last edited by Ceist; 03-03-2014 at 06:09 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-03-2014, 06:01 PM
 
758 posts, read 847,181 times
Reputation: 131
evolutionist scientists have this wheel they spin - the number comes into the billions of years. then they make a gadget that measures these rocks and comes up with the same figure. There is your proof they assert.

show me how you go back thousands of millions of years and enter billions of years. Show me how that is done (Accurately)

Show me the math! = YOU CAN'T !!!!!

Thousands of millions of.. ... ... guesses!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2014, 06:02 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,377,437 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atkutuq View Post
I see said the blind man.. and the man with no legs ran away!

evolutionist scientists have this wheel they spin - the number comes into the billions of years. then they make a gadget that measures these rocks and comes up with the same figure. There is your proof they assert.

show me how you go back thousands of millions of years and enter billions of years. Show me how that is done (Accurately)

Show me the math! = YOU CAN'T !!!!!

Thousands of millions of.. ... ... guesses!
It's not a 'guess', it's radiometric dating.

Foundational Concepts : Introduction to Dating Methods

Actionbioscience | Accuracy of Fossils and Dating Methods
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2014, 06:12 PM
 
758 posts, read 847,181 times
Reputation: 131
And it is faulty...

Uranium-235 704 Million Years Lead-207
Potassium-40 1.25 Billion Years Argon-40
Uranium-238 4.5 Billion Years Lead-206
Thorium-232 14.0 Billion Years Lead-208
Lutetium-176 35.9 Billion Years Hafnium-176
Rubidium-87 48.8 Billion Years Strontium-87
Samarium-147 106 Billion Years Neodymium-143

Grave errors -
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2014, 06:22 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,377,437 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atkutuq View Post
And it is faulty...

Uranium-235 704 Million Years Lead-207
Potassium-40 1.25 Billion Years Argon-40
Uranium-238 4.5 Billion Years Lead-206
Thorium-232 14.0 Billion Years Lead-208
Lutetium-176 35.9 Billion Years Hafnium-176
Rubidium-87 48.8 Billion Years Strontium-87
Samarium-147 106 Billion Years Neodymium-143

Grave errors -
Do you have a secret Bible code to support your assertion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2014, 06:42 PM
 
758 posts, read 847,181 times
Reputation: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceist View Post
Do you have a secret Bible code to support your assertion?

The fatal flaw with radioactive dating methods

No secrets - ! Just facts !!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2014, 06:50 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,377,437 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atkutuq View Post
From Creationists who say "radioactive dating is so shrouded with mystery"? LOL!

The "fatal flaw" is the lack of understanding of radiometric dating by those Creationists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2014, 06:58 PM
 
758 posts, read 847,181 times
Reputation: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceist View Post
From Creationists who say "radioactive dating is so shrouded with mystery"? LOL!

The "fatal flaw" is the lack of understanding of radiometric dating by those Creationists.
Oh..pardon me - I will find another source out of the millions available from a non-creationist view.

Will that suffice ?? Or is your game plan to just shoot the messenger?

Ages determined by radioactive decay are always subject to assumptions about original concentrations of the isotopes.

More guess work.

To the intriguing question "How old is the Earth?" we can of course only provide models and model calculations based on the best data we can get. While there are numerous natural processes that can serve as clocks, there are also many natural processes that can reset or scramble these time-dependent processes and introduce uncertainties.

More guess work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2014, 07:03 PM
2K5Gx2km
 
n/a posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atkutuq View Post
Oh..pardon me - I will find another source out of the millions available from a non-creationist view.

Will that suffice ?? Or is your game plan to just shoot the messenger?

Ages determined by radioactive decay are always subject to assumptions about original concentrations of the isotopes.

More guess work.

To the intriguing question "How old is the Earth?" we can of course only provide models and model calculations based on the best data we can get. While there are numerous natural processes that can serve as clocks, there are also many natural processes that can reset or scramble these time-dependent processes and introduce uncertainties.

More guess work.
Of course , that is why they have the margin of error.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2014, 07:04 PM
 
Location: Massatucky
1,187 posts, read 2,393,259 times
Reputation: 1916
Creationist all got F's in science. Science is based on proof and religion is based on faith. Faith is just that a belief not supported by fact. There is no truth in religion, in any Jesus, in any bible, in any god as those are human constructs built from ignorance, before science explained the world around us. Rejecting science is a rejection of reality and embracing religion is the acceptance of pure fantasy. Religion allowed slavery as the 'facts' of its day said god approved. Religion begot the crusades which murderd hundreds of non-beleivers in the name of god. The Twin Towers fell, the KKK lynched men of color and Arizona christians wanted the right to treat others like second-class citizens all for the same reason: Fanatical, blind adherence to religion. More people have died in the name of god, more hatred exists because of some alleged god. Mayabe the world should let go of this silly notion of The Creator, The Way, The Holy One and instead focus on what makes us all human and what we have in common, because we will never all beleive the same thing and those who think that their way is the only way are the ones who need to be called out and made to answer for the bigotry and hatred still prevalent in the world today. Creationists are willfully ignorant, so clearly from the assinine stupidity on the precedeing thread. It is had to imagine the kind of individuals who are pridefully dumb and reject any and all rational proven science simply because it would only prove their notion of god to be wrong. There is no god. Get over it. But just stop forcing ignorance and fantasy on those who know better. It is just plain rude and everyone is getting tired of the God Squad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top