Another court rules: Baker must serve gay couple. (myth, priests, punishments)

[Arach Angle]

Originally Posted by Disgustedman

Well, there's yet no evidence that anyone is born gay, so that argument is false on the face of it.





"

this is a flat out lie. People don't like it when you say "hey, look at that little soon to be &^%$." But I said it anyway about a 5 yr old and was right. Nothing in the commandments says you have to like how god works.

[charolastra00]

Originally Posted by Vizio

Unless, of course...one is a Christian. Then, all bets are off.

It must be so hard to have faced so little discrimination in your life that you need to invent false forms to feel like you are included.

[Know Nonsense]

Originally Posted by DewDropInn

Such unhappiness. Have you tried eating a delicious piece of cake to cheer yourself up?

Having a logical and judicial mind is evidently a curse in this quagmire of dysfunctional existence.

[DewDropInn]

Originally Posted by jeffbase40

Discrimination is a broad term and you simply want it defined to benefit your beliefs and groups.

My belief is that Bible-based discrimination is destructive.

My group is homo sapien.

[Know Nonsense]

How many long term married couples that you know who have never been divorced? How many people do you know that have been divorced at least once? See any correlation with de-valuation here? In other words 'progress' in the neo-liberals mind.....

[fishbrains]

Originally Posted by Know Nonsense

How many long term married couples that you know who have never been divorced? How many people do you know that have been divorced at least once? See any correlation with de-valuation here? In other words 'progress' in the neo-liberals mind.....

I know that you are trying to make a point here, but I have no idea what you are trying to get at.

[mordant]

Originally Posted by Know Nonsense

How many long term married couples that you know who have never been divorced? How many people do you know that have been divorced at least once? See any correlation with de-valuation here? In other words 'progress' in the neo-liberals mind.....

How do you define "progress"? I'm unsure what you are arguing against or advocating for here.

Do you believe that "respecting the institution of marriage" necessitates prohibiting divorce as well as opposing gay marriage? Or are you making a point that avowed respect for marriage is inconsistently applied, because some opponents of gay marriage don't oppose divorce? Or something else altogether?

[Caleb Longstreet]

Originally Posted by RonkonkomaNative

What kind of mind, thinks of lacing other peoples food with something harmful? Have you done such things?

What you suggest is illegal.

You don't say......and apparently, you don't understand comic relief....

[RonkonkomaNative]

Originally Posted by Caleb Longstreet

You don't say......and apparently, you don't understand comic relief....

ahahahahahahaha. Neither do you...

[badlander]

Originally Posted by Know Nonsense

How many long term married couples that you know who have never been divorced? How many people do you know that have been divorced at least once? See any correlation with de-valuation here? In other words 'progress' in the neo-liberals mind.....

I know more long term couples who have never been divorced than I know couples who have been divorced. Most of the couples who I know have been divorced seem very happy so i guess that is progress in their lives.