Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-15-2015, 12:31 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chadgates View Post
Putting up a prayer request board = theocracy?

WOW.
So, a student taking a picture of the prayer request board, was disrespecting the teacher's religion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-15-2015, 12:43 PM
 
Location: California side of the Sierras
11,162 posts, read 7,631,684 times
Reputation: 12523
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadgates View Post
One student didn't want it there?

Why?

How is it offensive to that student?

Yes the tolerance is overwhelming.
I cannot speak for that student. Why should a student in a public school have to tolerate being taught the religious beliefs of his/her teacher?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 12:46 PM
 
4,040 posts, read 2,555,287 times
Reputation: 4010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petunia 100 View Post
I cannot speak for that student. Why should a student in a public school have to tolerate being taught the religious beliefs of his/her teacher?
Unless I missed something, simply putting up a voluntary prayer request board is NOT teaching someone their religious beliefs.

You are really trying to stretch this, but it just isn't there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 12:48 PM
 
4,040 posts, read 2,555,287 times
Reputation: 4010
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
So, a student taking a picture of the prayer request board, was disrespecting the teacher's religion?

I can't see how that could be true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 12:51 PM
 
Location: California side of the Sierras
11,162 posts, read 7,631,684 times
Reputation: 12523
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadgates View Post
So my very thoughtful and 100% accurate response was "avoiding the question" in your mind?

OK..
Let me be more direct for you.

My opinion does not matter.

now you may respond to what I wrote concerning the intentions of the people who actually wrote the constitution thought about prayer being in direct conflict with the "separation" clause

If the
So let me get this straight.

The same founding fathers who wrote the 1st amendment, which is trumpeted by uninformed leftists to attack religious freedom on the basis of "separation of church and state" then violated their own values and belief system by opening congress with a prayer?

So if THEY who wrote the separation of church and state clause, also opened congress with prayer you are essentially arguing that THEY were in violation of the very constitution they created.

OR

maybe the "separation of church and state" clause has been very very twisted by the "tolerant" leftists, who don't really know their history but instead have been brainwashed into believing they do.
Again, this is not a response to the question asked and quoted. I'm really not sure what you are expecting in reply.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 12:55 PM
 
Location: City Data Land
17,156 posts, read 12,951,087 times
Reputation: 33179
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffbase40 View Post
There's a difference between proselytizing vs a display of religion in public.

A prayer board is not trying to convert students to Christians.
Incorrect. Both are encouraging the practice of religion in public school. If she wants to put up a prayer board for students, there's a job for that: teaching at a parochial school. She is free to apply at any of the thousands of parochial schools in America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 12:56 PM
 
Location: California side of the Sierras
11,162 posts, read 7,631,684 times
Reputation: 12523
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadgates View Post
Unless I missed something, simply putting up a voluntary prayer request board is NOT teaching someone their religious beliefs.

You are really trying to stretch this, but it just isn't there.
The belief that a deity will hear prayers is a religious belief. If there isn't a deity to hear, then why pray?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 12:57 PM
 
4,040 posts, read 2,555,287 times
Reputation: 4010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petunia 100 View Post
Again, this is not a response to the question asked and quoted. I'm really not sure what you are expecting in reply.
Let me shorten it and try to be less wordy.

The fact is that those founding fathers who wrote the 1st amendment and who wrote the separation of church and state clause, also opened congress with prayer so you are essentially arguing that THEY were in violation of the very constitution they created.

Is that about right? Or have I missed something?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 01:01 PM
 
4,040 posts, read 2,555,287 times
Reputation: 4010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petunia 100 View Post
The belief that a deity will hear prayers is a religious belief. If there isn't a deity to hear, then why pray?
But no one is FORCING them to believe ANYTHING. They are free to not participate.
Why should it be offensive that Johnny would like it if those who wish to could pray for his sick grandfather?

I do not agree with Muslims, yet a Muslim engaging in prayer to Allah does not offend me in the least.


How on earth can you feign being "offended" because someone says IF you want us to we will pray for you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2015, 01:09 PM
 
4,040 posts, read 2,555,287 times
Reputation: 4010
Continuing on that last thought the fact is what you people have done is the EXACT opposite of what the founding fathers wrote the clause for.

They didn't want Catholics telling protestants you MUST believe the same as us. If you are a catholic and someone else is a protestant you MUST not infringe on their right to practice their FREE EXERCISE of their religious beliefs.

NOT keep that stuff to yourself while you are at home.

The point was that NO one's point of view should infringe upon another person's right to freely express their religious beliefs.

They weren't constantly offended by one another. They respected each others right to worship as they saw fit without trying to silence them.

You are free to believe or not believe in whatever you like, but when you get "offended" by someone else's religious expression, then YOU Are trampling THEIR rights that were protected by the 1st amendment.

There's also a reason it was 1st...

We have twisted the heck out of that amendment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:59 PM.

Ā© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top