Objections to homosexuality (atheist, priest, Muslims, quote)

[Horn of ‘83]

Originally Posted by RonkonkomaNative

Did you not say who starts these threads? You are complaining.

No, just pointing out who actually starts these threads.

[RonkonkomaNative]

Originally Posted by jimmiej

No, just pointing out who actually starts these threads.

You asked a question.

So, you were expecting a reply? A list perhaps? If you object then do not participate if someone you find objectionable starts a discussion.

I have no idea who starts these threads, and I do not care. It is unimportant.

[Horn of ‘83]

Originally Posted by RonkonkomaNative

You asked a question.

So, you were expecting a reply? A list perhaps? If you object then do not participate if someone you find objectionable starts a discussion.

I have no idea who starts these threads, and I do not care. It is unimportant.

It was a rhetorical question.

[RonkonkomaNative]

Originally Posted by jimmiej

It was a rhetorical question.

Hardly. You were defending the fact you do not start discussions. It was never a question if you started a discussion.

You have joined them, and now complain about your active participation. Then you bring my participation into your complaints.

I own my participation. I own every word I write. I do not complain about who starts these discussions.

[jjrose]

Originally Posted by jimmiej

OK, please explain.

Unnatural - not existing in nature.

Since homosexuality does exist in nature, it can not be unnatural.

[Horn of ‘83]

Originally Posted by RonkonkomaNative

Hardly. You were defending the fact you do not start discussions. It was never a question if you started a discussion.

You have joined them, and now complain about your active participation. Then you bring my participation into your complaints.

I own my participation. I own every word I write. I do not complain about who starts these discussions.

Not true (and you know it). No one forces me to participate here. Why would I complain? That makes no sense.

[jjrose]

Originally Posted by jimmiej

Anal sex can be.

Then you are against anal sex, not homosexuality.
Both heterosexuals and homosexuals have anal sex. Many of each group do not have anal sex.

If you are against homosexuality because of anal sex, then you should also be against heterosexuality since they too have anal sex.

[Nozzferrahhtoo]

Originally Posted by jimmiej

I know you understand what I meant by "offensive to nature".

I understand offence, and I understand there is no reason nature can experience it.

I also know the thread is about homosexuality, yet you keep harping on about anal sex as if the two are synonyms.

I also know that natural is not a synonym for good, and unnatural is not one for bad.

So all in all, it seems you really do not know WHERE you are with the words and terms you are employing in your rants. Because this is a thread about "Objections to homosexuality" and all you are offering are "NON objections to anal sex".

[zthatzmanz28]

Originally Posted by Soular

Its a mental disease like depression. Also it goes against all the laws of nature, you cannot create a child through natural means, another thing, inserting into an exit hole is going against human anatomy and physics. It promotes pedophilia, yeah I said it.

ROFLMAO....

My wife and I cannot "create a child through natural means" either, so is our sexual relationship UNNATURAL?

Is not the vagina an EXIT hole as well?

[denverian]

Originally Posted by zthatzmanz28

ROFLMAO....

My wife and I cannot "create a child through natural means" either, so is our sexual relationship UNNATURAL?

Is not the vagina an EXIT hole as well?

lol! Good point

He also seems to be rather mis or uninformed in anatomy. If no one were to ever have anal sex, then why are there sexual nerve endings down there? Why is it sexually pleasurable? Or is that just the devil's temptation