Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
an example is a muslim employee refuses to handle alcohol.
Like the Minnesota cabbies that were ordered to take passengers with alcohol or get new jobs? Or are you referring to businesses making accommodations for Muslims workers?
Like the Minnesota cabbies that were ordered to take passengers with alcohol or get new jobs? Or are you referring to businesses making accommodations for Muslims workers?
yes the Minnesota cabbies a unite express employee who converted to Islam and then refuse to serve alcohol on a flight and in the U.K cashiers in a supermarket won't handle alcohol during checking out.
yes the Minnesota cabbies a unite express employee who converted to Islam and then refuse to serve alcohol on a flight and in the U.K cashiers in a supermarket won't handle alcohol during checking out.
The cabbies were told that they had to work, the flight attendant ended up bing fired. In the examples you gave the business decided to accommodate their employee but the customer was still served. If the customer was refused service by the business then it would be exactly the same as the bakery. So instead of creeping Sharia law we should go back to discimation by Christian majority?
I'm guessing that he had read about the landlord that is a Sanders supporter and refused to rent to Trump supporters. So far, stupid isn't a protected class and he has the right to refuse service. The fact that he claims to be Christian is a moot point.
I'm guessing that he had read about the landlord that is a Sanders supporter and refused to rent to Trump supporters. So far, stupid isn't a protected class and he has the right to refuse service. The fact that he claims to be Christian is a moot point.
Except he claimed BECAUSE he was christian he had the RIGHT...not because he is stupid. Or are these the same?
Except he claimed BECAUSE he was christian he had the RIGHT...not because he is stupid. Or are these the same?
Yes, in some individuals, they can be. Of course, the same principal applies to atheists, buddhists, moslems, taoists, shintoists, hindus, jews.... .
Quote:
Originally Posted by mordant
This tow truck driver should either quit discriminating or quit offering his services to the public.
My guess is that the lady who was broken down by the side of the road lacks the energy or resources to sue the tow truck driver or his company, but I hope someone will take up her cause pro bono and convince her to do so, because people like this should be made an example of.
The tow truck driver, though a jerk, did not discriminate. "Political belief" is not a potected class. Race, religion, and in some states, sexual orientation is. As such, he has no legal obligation to provide her service. He might face a penalty with his license though.
Yes, in some individuals, they can be. Of course, the same principal applies to atheists, buddhists, moslems, taoists, shintoists, hindus, jews.... .
The tow truck driver, though a jerk, did not discriminate. "Political belief" is not a potected class. Race, religion, and in some states, sexual orientation is. As such, he has no legal obligation to provide her service. He might face a penalty with his license though.
He did discriminate. He did nothing illegal though. It does not need to be illegal for it to be discrimination otherwise discrimination differs state by state. Yes he is a jerk.
Yes, in some individuals, they can be. Of course, the same principal applies to atheists, buddhists, moslems, taoists, shintoists, hindus, jews.... .
The tow truck driver, though a jerk, did not discriminate. "Political belief" is not a potected class. Race, religion, and in some states, sexual orientation is. As such, he has no legal obligation to provide her service. He might face a penalty with his license though.
But I have yet to hear about atheists, buddhists, moslems, taoists, shintoists, hindus, jews.... leaving a disabled person on the road side to fend for themselves?
But I have yet to hear about atheists, buddhists, moslems, taoists, shintoists, hindus, jews.... leaving a disabled person on the road side to fend for themselves?
Muslim cab drivers frequently and regularly leave blind and handicapped people on the road side to fend for themselves, because they refuse to allow handicapped people with service animals to ride in their cabs. here are some links
Last edited by Tzaphkiel; 05-17-2016 at 07:12 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
