Adam and Eve? Not really, and here is the real story... (Isaiah, Israel)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Interestingly, the group I'm in that's reading Diarmaid McCulloch's Christianity just read this past week the chapter in which Darwin appears. Most of Protestant Christianity easily accepted evolution as not in conflict with their faith. Only in the early 20th century does the inerrant, literal bible concept appear. It's a relatively recent and exclusive, if noisy, breed.
Not really, they were Jewish, and Jewish people don't, for example, take the Garden of Eden story or the Job story literally. Of course, I can't say whether this was the case 2000 years ago. You'd have to ask someone who knows historical Jewish thought.
I remember the first time I found out that Jews do not see the Garden of Eden story as a prophecy of a messiah. I always assumed that the prophecy came from Jewish interpretation, not Christian reinterpretation, but that they just didn't think it was Jesus who was the messiah or that the snake represented the personification of evil.
I said to the woman who told me this, "So wait...what is the snake in the story about to you guys? Just a talking snake?" She laughed and responded, "Pretty much." Of course the overall story to them is all about disobedience to God.
That is interesting. I think I read about the birth of Bible literalists in the UK. But it has been a little time since I have read that. Thanks for that link.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.