Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-12-2016, 12:00 PM
 
5,912 posts, read 2,606,392 times
Reputation: 1049

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eusebius View Post
Sorry but that is not proof. Please try again.
How about you prove it isn't a fairytale.

Let use the scientific formula for proof.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-12-2016, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Somewhere out there.
10,535 posts, read 6,169,672 times
Reputation: 6574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eusebius View Post
Jesus and the writers of the New Testament who were Jews believed the historic creation account and Flood and Job's account to be non-fictional. That is good enough for me.


The writers of the New Testament might have believed it Eusebius. but to point out the patently obvious, it was (as Mighty Queen said) 2000 years ago. 2000 years ago people understood almost nothing about the natural world . Of course they made up stories to explain what they didn't understand.
One creation myth is as good as any of the other myriad of creation myths out there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 02:52 PM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,286,655 times
Reputation: 5565
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Last Amalekite 1Sam15 View Post
How about you prove it isn't a fairytale.

Let use the scientific formula for proof.
Wait for some Ron Wyatt to be unleashed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 03:10 PM
 
5,912 posts, read 2,606,392 times
Reputation: 1049
Can't wait until a cockatrice or a satyr fossil is found. Surely they were on the ark?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 06:34 PM
 
17,966 posts, read 15,975,571 times
Reputation: 1010
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Last Amalekite 1Sam15 View Post
Can't wait until a cockatrice or a satyr fossil is found. Surely they were on the ark?
Which Bible has "satyr" in it?

Here is the KJV:
Isa_34:14 The wild beasts of the desert shall also meet with the wild beasts of the island, and the satyr shall cry to his fellow; the screech owl also shall rest there, and find for herself a place of rest.

Here is a properly translated Bible:

Isa 34:14 And falcons shall encounter each other in arid places, and the hairy goat shall call to its associate. Yea, there shall lull the hoot owl, and find for itself a rest."

H8163
satyr
saw-eer', saw-eer'
From H8175; shaggy; as noun, a he goat; by analogy a faun: - devil, goat, hairy, kid, rough, satyr.
Strong's Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries

So, yes, the hairy goat did make it onto the ark. Do you have any more stupid comments?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 06:37 PM
 
17,966 posts, read 15,975,571 times
Reputation: 1010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruithne View Post
The writers of the New Testament might have believed it Eusebius. but to point out the patently obvious, it was (as Mighty Queen said) 2000 years ago. 2000 years ago people understood almost nothing about the natural world . Of course they made up stories to explain what they didn't understand.
One creation myth is as good as any of the other myriad of creation myths out there.
Actually they had the historic accounts of how the earth was created and the heavens and all life on earth were created. 2000 years removed just goes to prove how stupid people have become in our present day.
There is no creation account even close to equaling the historic account as found in the Sacred Scriptures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 06:40 PM
 
17,966 posts, read 15,975,571 times
Reputation: 1010
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Last Amalekite 1Sam15 View Post
How about you prove it isn't a fairytale.

Let use the scientific formula for proof.
In post 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarantula spider said this:
Of course it is not historic, just a fairy tale.
I asked for proof it is not historic, and proof it is just a fairy tale.
So far no one has proven such.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 07:22 PM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,926,708 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eusebius View Post
Which Bible has "satyr" in it?

Here is the KJV:
Isa_34:14 The wild beasts of the desert shall also meet with the wild beasts of the island, and the satyr shall cry to his fellow; the screech owl also shall rest there, and find for herself a place of rest.

Here is a properly translated Bible:

Isa 34:14 And falcons shall encounter each other in arid places, and the hairy goat shall call to its associate. Yea, there shall lull the hoot owl, and find for itself a rest."

H8163
satyr
saw-eer', saw-eer'
From H8175; shaggy; as noun, a he goat; by analogy a faun: - devil, goat, hairy, kid, rough, satyr.
Strong's Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries

So, yes, the hairy goat did make it onto the ark. Do you have any more stupid comments?
So all those wandering desert tribes could have goats to herd, of course.

It ALL makes sense now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Top of the South, NZ
22,216 posts, read 21,687,075 times
Reputation: 7608
Is it possible that the very first simple life forms gave themselves the names of Adam and Eve?

This could be a win/win for both science, and the talking snake people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 08:29 PM
 
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
11,025 posts, read 5,991,147 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eusebius View Post
It says it was a serpent. It also doesn't say it had legs, only that it would crawl on its belly. In other words, it would leave the trees and exist on the ground.
Would these not be vestigial legs? Clearly these serpents used to have legs.



Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top