Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-09-2016, 11:51 PM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,928,903 times
Reputation: 4561

Advertisements

Charleston church where 9 people were massacred will pocket $1.8m in donations | Daily Mail Online

Are Christians not starting to get livid with these daily, and I mean daily, mishandling of funds? In this case, this friggin' church is not even pretending that they are doing anything else but keeping over $1.8 MILLION dollars of a total of $3.3 million raised. I have no words I can put on this forum; I might get banned.

YOU Christians need to stop this problem. YOU Christians are as much as fault on this incessant malfeasance in your communities as the Muslims are for not stopping their radicals. YOU Christians need to find a backbone, and get some real morals, not morals you think exists in that fairy tale book you keep preaching from, and then only partially, because you forget the part about owning slaves and how a rape victim gets stoned to death if the she didn't scream loud enough.

Why the bleep do the relatives of the white racist who shot the victims have to sue their own bleeping church? Man this makes me angry. And I bet their are some hypocrites on this very board who will see nothing wrong with this.

I'm sure tomorrow will bring a new outrage. It is just the way so many Christian churches and their leaders seem to work in today's USA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-10-2016, 12:03 AM
 
1,592 posts, read 1,213,097 times
Reputation: 1161
I have every confidence that the church will spend the 1.8 million wisely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2016, 12:25 AM
 
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
11,030 posts, read 5,993,059 times
Reputation: 5705
Quote:
Originally Posted by svendrell View Post
i have every confidence that the church will spend the 1.8 million wisely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2016, 12:32 AM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,928,903 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by svendrell View Post
I have every confidence that the church will spend the 1.8 million wisely.
You owe me a new screen! The tea is all over it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2016, 12:43 AM
 
1,592 posts, read 1,213,097 times
Reputation: 1161
I thought you'd like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2016, 01:01 AM
 
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
11,030 posts, read 5,993,059 times
Reputation: 5705
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
You owe me a new screen! The tea is all over it.
I nearly spilt my beer! Now that would have been serious!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2016, 04:02 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,711,454 times
Reputation: 8798
We should be careful not to play into the hands of sensationalistic journalism such as what the Daily Mail regularly traffics in. Unfortunately, such innuendo and insinuation is all we may get because AME churches are, literally, episcopal, and therefore not answerable to the membership, and may use their protected status to hide where the money actually goes.

What is noticeably missing from the discussion, though, is discussion about what was said about the donations when they were made. That matters more than anything else. I'm wracking my brain but I don't remember what we told our congregants when we shared our collection plate with the church. I'm pretty sure we didn't say, "This is all going to the families of the victims," which we would have said if we were donating, specifically, to a victims fund. I recall comments about "standing in solidarity", which clearly would indicate that some of the money we donated was to go for fostering the church's mission and not just providing financial relief to the victims' families.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2016, 05:04 AM
 
Location: Northeastern US
20,018 posts, read 13,496,411 times
Reputation: 9945
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
What is noticeably missing from the discussion, though, is discussion about what was said about the donations when they were made. That matters more than anything else.
I agree. I actually don't have an issue with the use the money is being put to, so long as donors were not either given to expect it to go to victim families, or specified that it should. According to the article, $280K was specified for victim families and they added $1 million to that.

Everything my community did with respect to that was a generalized solidarity stand with no strings attached.

Some of it is going to "scholarships" and I'm not sure what that means. Scholarships for children of the victims? My guess is, endowment of already-established scholarships.

But it really is their prerogative to do what they please with the money.

My only real criticism is the lack of detailed transparency ABOUT what they do with the money, and the simple fact that $1.5 million is not what I would exactly call generous. I don't recall the demographic provenance of the victims but the entire $1.5 million would only fully support, say, two families who lost a young wage-earning father, depending on details (size of family, lifetime value of lost wages, offsets by private life insurance payouts). In truth $1.5 million just isn't that much money anymore, period, in today's world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2016, 08:10 AM
 
Location: Baldwin County, AL
2,446 posts, read 1,387,880 times
Reputation: 605
Quote:
Originally Posted by mordant View Post
I agree. I actually don't have an issue with the use the money is being put to, so long as donors were not either given to expect it to go to victim families, or specified that it should. According to the article, $280K was specified for victim families and they added $1 million to that.

Everything my community did with respect to that was a generalized solidarity stand with no strings attached.

Some of it is going to "scholarships" and I'm not sure what that means. Scholarships for children of the victims? My guess is, endowment of already-established scholarships.

But it really is their prerogative to do what they please with the money.

My only real criticism is the lack of detailed transparency ABOUT what they do with the money, and the simple fact that $1.5 million is not what I would exactly call generous. I don't recall the demographic provenance of the victims but the entire $1.5 million would only fully support, say, two families who lost a young wage-earning father, depending on details (size of family, lifetime value of lost wages, offsets by private life insurance payouts). In truth $1.5 million just isn't that much money anymore, period, in today's world.
Well, it may not be "that much" money, but for the average American, that is almost 29 years of working (Average income in the US is right at $52,000). So I would say that is a pretty substantial sum of money for most people.


That being said, if people were not told directly where the money was going, then the church can do what they please with it. Hopefully it is spent wisely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2016, 09:52 AM
 
Location: Northeastern US
20,018 posts, read 13,496,411 times
Reputation: 9945
Quote:
Originally Posted by southernbored View Post
Well, it may not be "that much" money, but for the average American, that is almost 29 years of working (Average income in the US is right at $52,000). So I would say that is a pretty substantial sum of money for most people.
Yeah but that's my point. If a 25 year old father was killed in the shooting then his family loses some 40 years of working income based on his normal life expectancy and expected retirement age. If you are really going to compensate those families for that loss then you need a substantial sum of money to do it. Sure, anyone reading this would be thrilled to be handed a million bucks, but you need that much in the bank just to retire and live modestly off the interest these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top