Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio
Yup. And I've observed that you can lead an atheist to evidence but you can't make him believe.
|
You don't HAVE any evidence, Vizio.
And that isn't just me talking. If you had evidence, the entire world would be rocking back on its heels and the debate would be over.
But it's not. Which means the evidence (so-called) isn't anywhere near conclusive enough to prove that a god exists much less that your specific god exists.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio
If you say so.
|
It's not just me, Vizio. I'm not a self back-patter. I have had FAR too many people say so for me to adopt any sort of false modesty on this point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio
Just answer me one question: How did life begin? And don't make any assumptions.
|
I haven't the slightest idea.
And neither do you.
Not that this question has anything whatsoever to do with any kind of evidence for the existence of a god, mind you, and it certainly offers no evidence for the existence of your specific god.
It only represents a question science hasn't answered yet.
Just like there was a time when science hadn't yet answered the question:
How did the sun get here? I'm sure at some point there were deity worshipers, perhaps even Christians, who used the same argument regarding the sun that you're making with the origin of life.
"Well ... since YOU don't know how the sun originated and since the best minds in the world haven't figured out how it happened, the only possible explanation is that God created it with magic!"
Of course today we know all about the sun and the life cycles of stars. Even you would no longer claim that the sun just "poofed" into being the way you now claim that humans "poofed" into being. Unless, of course, you're a Young Earth Creationist which you have said repeatedly that you're not.
Therefore, this notion that stumping science with the "How did life begin?" question is somehow proving the existence of a god is just as nonsensical now as stumping science with "Where did the sun come from?" was then.
By the same token, there's simply no reason to expect science to have all of the answers today any more than there was a reason to expect science to have all of the answers 100, 300, 500, or 1000 years ago. Just what makes you think that, today, science stands at the pinnacle of knowledge? What makes you think that, today, all that can be known is known? All that can be discovered has been discovered? Thus, if we still do not know where life came from, it will never be known and, therefore, it must have a supernatural (ergo, divine) cause?
There's some super-flawed reasoning with the cosmological argument. There always was.