Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-23-2017, 07:43 AM
 
Location: On the brink of WWIII
21,088 posts, read 29,132,415 times
Reputation: 7812

Advertisements

From the article:

According to the Bible, Mary was among a group of women who followed Jesus and his disciples and “provided for them out of their resources,” which indicates that she was a woman of means, Sister Johnson said. She was most likely an independent woman, because she is identified by her town of origin rather than as the wife or daughter of a particular man.

And yet the early church decided it best to label her a prostitute who was merely showing her gratitude as a "sinner"when hanging out with Jesus.
As we look back, are we blatantly ignoring who Mary really was? Have we allowed the church to stain her reputation and were we all too willing to accept the church's explanation without considering the real truth?

Truth About Mary Magdalene Could Open Doors for Women in the Church, Scholar Says
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-23-2017, 07:53 AM
 
Location: Southern Oregon
17,071 posts, read 10,872,134 times
Reputation: 1871
It is interesting how later "clergy" denigrated women, a tough legacy to dispel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2017, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Southwestern, USA, now.
21,020 posts, read 19,283,971 times
Reputation: 23658
I don't know exactly who she was...but yes, to your ques we allowed the church
to stain her reputation.
There is a gospel of hers they have uncovered, right?

Yes, here: The Gospel According to Mary Magdalene

Couldn't give reps to either of you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2017, 08:19 AM
 
9,588 posts, read 5,017,503 times
Reputation: 756
Whoever she was or was not, the Spirit did not write her "gospel", if for no other reason, because He would not exalt the carnal mind as that writing I just read did, since it's enmity against Him. Many forgeries abounded because there was good money in them, just as there is today. I don't think she was a prostitute, but would it matter if she was? She still was close to Him, that much is obvious. Peace
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2017, 09:43 AM
 
Location: On the brink of WWIII
21,088 posts, read 29,132,415 times
Reputation: 7812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rbbi1 View Post
Whoever she was or was not, the Spirit did not write her "gospel", if for no other reason, because He would not exalt the carnal mind as that writing I just read did, since it's enmity against Him. Many forgeries abounded because there was good money in them, just as there is today. I don't think she was a prostitute, but would it matter if she was? She still was close to Him, that much is obvious. Peace
Would it matter if she was a disciple?

The spirit did not write any of he gospels, MAN did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2017, 02:30 PM
 
9,588 posts, read 5,017,503 times
Reputation: 756
Quote:
Originally Posted by zthatzmanz28 View Post
Would it matter if she was a disciple?

The spirit did not write any of he gospels, MAN did.

Who says she wasn't? It's not a coincidence that a woman/soul who had 7 demons (fullness of darkness) cast out of her was the first one to see the RISEN Christ.

So says you. Peace
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2017, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Southern Oregon
17,071 posts, read 10,872,134 times
Reputation: 1871
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Hepburn View Post
I don't know exactly who she was...but yes, to your ques we allowed the church
to stain her reputation.
There is a gospel of hers they have uncovered, right?

Yes, here: The Gospel According to Mary Magdalene

Couldn't give reps to either of you.
Yes, as I recall that is a gnostic text which is clearly pseudoepigraphical, but the very fact that it would be attributed to Mary Magdalene speaks volumnes about the time and attitudes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2017, 02:50 PM
 
Location: On the brink of WWIII
21,088 posts, read 29,132,415 times
Reputation: 7812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rbbi1 View Post
Who says she wasn't? It's not a coincidence that a woman/soul who had 7 demons (fullness of darkness) cast out of her was the first one to see the RISEN Christ.

So says you. Peace
As a disciple, why do you think her book not included in the official canon?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2017, 04:23 PM
 
9,588 posts, read 5,017,503 times
Reputation: 756
Quote:
Originally Posted by zthatzmanz28 View Post
As a disciple, why do you think her book not included in the official canon?

If there was an authentic one, and likely there was (but I don't believe that one is it), who compiled the canon and you'll have your answer. Peace
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2017, 04:35 PM
 
18,916 posts, read 27,395,359 times
Reputation: 20235
Not only MEN wrote the gospels but, also, MEN decided which gospels are in and which are out. Only hard headed fundi will argue otherwise to death and, mostly, out of fear that whatever he believes into may be a wrong choice. Or, out of inability to comprehend anything outside of church (MEN) established dogma. Chewing mental chew gum is always easier than independent thinking.


Courtesans, heters and other similar female professions were very respected in the ancient world and usually wealthy. That modern man does not know difference between a prostitute and a heter or courtesan is man's fault. You might read on Safo.
But anyhow.
World is not man only. World is man and woman. Religion based on man only is destined to lose roughly half of believers as roughly half the population is women.
To be successful, religion must appeal to both genders.
Hence, a male and female principle must be in it. So you have it. Jesus's mother is just that - mother. But MM is female partner, in whatever form it is considered. Her character brings realism to the story. Makes woman's heart soften.

Either way, wasn't she the first one to tell the jerks that he resurrected, as he walked with them and they saw him not, yet Mary came and told them - he is with us, I witness to that? While MEN were arguing who will be sitting by his right hand in haven?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top