Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-21-2018, 12:57 PM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,088 posts, read 20,738,332 times
Reputation: 5930

Advertisements

Good point. Though from the warm glow of feelgood to a placebo reduction of stress is not too much of a leap. But I do notice that there in no mention of religion in the article. While altruism might bring some benefit to the giver, how is this some kind of advert for religion? There has always been the suspicion that some Christians have the idea that they have to please God, because getting to heaven is never a guarantee. So isn't there the suspicion that no good act by a Christian is really without some hope that it is getting them a little bit more of a guarantee of being saved?

Whereas secularists, if they help out (and they do) have no such carrot, nor indeed stick, prompting them. The do it without any expectation of getting anything back, other than a long -term effect of making people better.

Oh, and a feelgood effect taking the stress -levels down a notch, of course.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-21-2018, 01:32 PM
 
241 posts, read 95,233 times
Reputation: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuminousTruth View Post
Making our sweet ol' Nate lose his trust in you? Weird because as far as I have read both your posts I had the impression that both of you were into deeply liberal versions of Christianity.
Is it that you have been fibbing for Jesus often? That does not look good, although it's understandable that bias can often carry us in the direction of that which is misleading.

I doubt joining a religion for the health benefits would count as kindness nor as "non-strategic."

I read the news article from ScienceDaily and searched the science article that they linked. No mention of a positive effect on health, just that "the warm glow" of altruistic kindness might be linked to the different brain state correlated with such a kindness (according to fMRI, both the reward areas and an extra area*) as opposed to strategic kindness (only the reward area).

*I searched further on this: the extra area is the "sgACC" which might be involved in modulating emotional behavior and also is possibly implicated in partially preventing some mood disorders like major depression and bipolar disorder.

Still, the metastudy in no way yet supposes (nor does the news article) that altruistic kindness would have a causal positive effect on mental health (let alone general health).

Would be nice to know though, since these are brain imaging studies. I have heard that a more positive mood is correlated with better overall health.

directly qouted from the article:

" But they also found that acts of altruism, with no hope of personal benefit, activate the reward areas of the brain too, and more than that, that some brain regions (in the 'subgenual anterior cingulate cortex') were more active during altruistic generosity, indicating that there is something unique about being altruistic with no hope of gaining something in return."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2018, 01:36 PM
 
241 posts, read 95,233 times
Reputation: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRANSPONDER View Post
Good point. Though from the warm glow of feelgood to a placebo reduction of stress is not too much of a leap. But I do notice that there in no mention of religion in the article. While altruism might bring some benefit to the giver, how is this some kind of advert for religion? There has always been the suspicion that some Christians have the idea that they have to please God, because getting to heaven is never a guarantee. So isn't there the suspicion that no good act by a Christian is really without some hope that it is getting them a little bit more of a guarantee of being saved?

Whereas secularists, if they help out (and they do) have no such carrot, nor indeed stick, prompting them. The do it without any expectation of getting anything back, other than a long -term effect of making people better.

Oh, and a feelgood effect taking the stress -levels down a notch, of course.

one doesnt have to be religious to have natural empathy, sympathy or morals. many humanist and secular organizations not only advocate for human digity, but are quite altruistic.

to clarify, this article states that there is something physically unique to this type of altruism.

qouted directly from article:
" But they also found that acts of altruism, with no hope of personal benefit, activate the reward areas of the brain too, and more than that, that some brain regions (in the 'subgenual anterior cingulate cortex') were more active during altruistic generosity, indicating that there is something unique about being altruistic with no hope of gaining something in return."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2018, 01:42 PM
 
Location: City-Data Forum
7,943 posts, read 6,069,223 times
Reputation: 1359
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRANSPONDER View Post
Good point. Though from the warm glow of feelgood to a placebo reduction of stress is not too much of a leap. But I do notice that there in no mention of religion in the article. While altruism might bring some benefit to the giver, how is this some kind of advert for religion? There has always been the suspicion that some Christians have the idea that they have to please God, because getting to heaven is never a guarantee. So isn't there the suspicion that no good act by a Christian is really without some hope that it is getting them a little bit more of a guarantee of being saved?

Whereas secularists, if they help out (and they do) have no such carrot, nor indeed stick, prompting them. The do it without any expectation of getting anything back, other than a long -term effect of making people better.

Oh, and a feelgood effect taking the stress -levels down a notch, of course.
It's very much the megachurch mentality, very snake oil.

"My whole perspective on my faith has been a transaction."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-nE-zrIhKc

Of course, the above video's title is click-baited by Buzzfeed. She still believes in a God, but not a Megachurch God.

Last edited by LuminousTruth; 10-21-2018 at 03:00 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2018, 02:40 PM
 
Location: City-Data Forum
7,943 posts, read 6,069,223 times
Reputation: 1359
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiros7 View Post
directly qouted from the article:

" But they also found that acts of altruism, with no hope of personal benefit, activate the reward areas of the brain too, and more than that, that some brain regions (in the 'subgenual anterior cingulate cortex') were more active during altruistic generosity, indicating that there is something unique about being altruistic with no hope of gaining something in return."
I did read that. I agree there is something unique about different brain areas lighting up in the MRI machine, but nothing about greater health benefits. The implications that the metastudy authors did note was for marketing and corporate fundraising strategies. They didn't even bring health to it, other than mentioning a "warm glow."

Last edited by LuminousTruth; 10-21-2018 at 02:58 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2018, 02:54 PM
 
241 posts, read 95,233 times
Reputation: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuminousTruth View Post
I did read that. I agree there is something unique about different brain areas lighting up in the MRI machine, but nothing about greater health benefits. The implications that the metastudy authors did note was for Marketing and Corporate Fundraising Strategies. They didn't even bring health to it, other than mentioning a "warm glow."

i dont encroach, condemn or judge those with different or no beliefs.

what is the point

why would i take the time to self righteously impose my beliefs on someone who adheres to something differently

i dont micromanage free speech; therefore, i will not impose my beliefs on someone else.

dictatorships tend do those sort of things.

i believe in individual freedom, not a theocratic dictatorship
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2018, 04:38 PM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,088 posts, read 20,738,332 times
Reputation: 5930
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuminousTruth View Post
It's very much the megachurch mentality, very snake oil.

"My whole perspective on my faith has been a transaction."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-nE-zrIhKc

Of course, the above video's title is click-baited by Buzzfeed. She still believes in a God, but not a Megachurch God.
Oh yes. 'Working up religion' is mass -marketing of the warm fuzzies, inflated to hot fizzies. But it's works fine for the individual. "Take some home with you today".

I'll watch that vid, too. In fact the best line for atheism now (I think) is to engage with those who leave the megachurch for the smaller church, the smaller church for personal belief, personal belief for irreligion, irreligion for doubt. Anyone who asks a question and decides to opt out of any 'Flow', is a fair game to be targe... hmmm...a sincere questioner to be engaged with by atheism in hopes to achieve better understanding and respect.

Hmm. Well her husband stopped believing and it rather seems that she did too. She couldn't have been ostracised by the church community any more if she had.

Last edited by TRANSPONDER; 10-21-2018 at 04:49 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2018, 05:53 PM
 
8,226 posts, read 3,424,199 times
Reputation: 6094
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiros7 View Post
many religions and spiritualities advocate altruism. now, a scientific study has found that giving without being recipricated has a positive effect on health

source:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0927105720.htm


jesus taught:


Luke 14:11-14 (WEB)
11 For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.”
12 He also said to the one who had invited him, “When you make a dinner or a supper, don’t call your friends, nor your brothers, nor your kinsmen, nor rich neighbors, or perhaps they might also return the favor, and pay you back.
13 But when you make a feast, ask the poor, the maimed, the lame, or the blind;
14 and you will be blessed, because they don’t have the resources to repay you. For you will be repaid in the resurrection of the righteous.”



Luke 6:33-34 (WEB)
33 If you do good to those who do good to you, what credit is that to you? For even sinners do the same.
34 If you lend to those from whom you hope to receive, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners, to receive back as much.
Sure, people can feel good about themselves when they give a little, when they give what they can afford. I doubt they measured how people feel when they give too much and cause themselves hardship, or when their giving is not appreciated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2018, 06:01 PM
 
8,226 posts, read 3,424,199 times
Reputation: 6094
Altruism can be found throughout nature, in every social species. There was no need for Jesus to come along and tell people to be altruistic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2018, 05:12 AM
 
Location: City-Data Forum
7,943 posts, read 6,069,223 times
Reputation: 1359
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiros7 View Post
i dont encroach, condemn or judge those with different or no beliefs.

what is the point

why would i take the time to self righteously impose my beliefs on someone who adheres to something differently

i dont micromanage free speech; therefore, i will not impose my beliefs on someone else.

dictatorships tend do those sort of things.

i believe in individual freedom, not a theocratic dictatorship
Oh... well, O.K.

Are you talking about nate's possible misunderstanding of you?

Still, since the sgACC is involved, and that brain region might possibly be involved in better health, altruistic kindness might be involved in better health as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top