Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-23-2018, 03:01 AM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
5,671 posts, read 4,354,716 times
Reputation: 2610

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by granpa View Post
Why do you distinguish between living things and nonliving things? Aren't living things made of non-living matter?

You distinguish between them because life has emerged as an emergent property from nonliving matter. In the same way humans have emerged from the Animal Kingdom. We are something entirely new
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes View Post
You refute yourself. Life is just a subset of chemistry, but it is still chemistry.
Just as we are a sub set of the animal kingdom.

Arguing same = different adds nothing to the conversation.
I've got to agree with granpa again.

If a bacterium lacks as sense of feeling or ability to really experience things, I'd say that in many ways it has more in common with a rock than a person, despite it and a person both being alive, in most relevant ways.

I don't see a firm distinction between life and non-life either, at least based on how we currently define life.

Maybe if they started the definition of life at "the ability to experience something's surroundings" the divide would be more clear...but then researchers would be arguing over what that means for the next thousand years and there would never be an agreed upon system to categorize life forms.

Our classification system for life has significance in ways...but in other ways it's not very useful, and everybody knows this.

That's why I'm in the same category as certain types of single-celled organisms, but other types of single-celled organisms are not in our category.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-23-2018, 03:07 AM
 
2,854 posts, read 2,053,876 times
Reputation: 348
Anything that reproduces and evolves is alive
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 03:09 AM
 
2,854 posts, read 2,053,876 times
Reputation: 348
If you play devil's advocate in a discussion or debate, you express an opinion which you may not agree with but which is very different to what other people have been saying, in order to make the argument more interesting.

Even if you agree with the general idea that someone else is presenting you might play Devil's Advocate in order to point out some small flaw in their reasoning
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 03:43 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,173 posts, read 26,207,141 times
Reputation: 27914
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clintone View Post
It's now wonder people frown upon the idea that we're animals. Our language and culture is filled with instances of us frowning upon animal characteristics.

Those negatively-viewed aspects usually include our mentalities in dire situations too. In dire situations sometimes we'll act rapidly to solve a problem, but often, particularly if we're surprised, we'll get impulsive, reactionary, panicky, be led by our instincts, etc...most of which are not looked highly upon.
True, but repressing those basic "animal instincts' for a variety of reasons, does not negate the fact that they are there.
Which, to the regret of many people, leaves us, and rightfully so, being classified as animals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 04:03 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,384,306 times
Reputation: 73937
Most people only care about morality when it is convenient or suits their purposes.

I see nothing inconsistent with animals in that behavior.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 04:32 AM
 
Location: Germany
16,784 posts, read 4,989,284 times
Reputation: 2119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clintone View Post
Or...I can just look at the difference, rather than the similarities.

Same thing
No. You can look at the differences between a Porsche and a VW Golf, but they are still cars. Looking at the differences just means you can pretend you are special.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clintone View Post
Except there are differences. If we're unique enough, it makes sense to place humans in some other category, at least if your goal is less related to biology and more related to behavior.
Our behavior is related to biology, and much more than you think. Your subconscious brain works much faster than your conscious brain, and much of your behavior is subconscious.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clintone View Post
I don't see a problem with placing humans in a separate category from other organisms. Biologically, we're animals, but I think we're unusual enough we could be placed in our own category for more practical reasons.
What practical reasons? To pretend we are special?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 04:34 AM
 
Location: Germany
16,784 posts, read 4,989,284 times
Reputation: 2119
Quote:
Originally Posted by granpa View Post
It is objectivity that separates man from the animals
So you keep asserting because you do not want to accept we are simply objective animals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 04:36 AM
 
Location: Germany
16,784 posts, read 4,989,284 times
Reputation: 2119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clintone View Post
Yeah...but it's still sounding like human's are the better meme-users. Language allows a lot of power to adapt rapidly.
So chimpanzees are also not animals?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 04:39 AM
 
Location: Germany
16,784 posts, read 4,989,284 times
Reputation: 2119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clintone View Post
I've got to agree with granpa again.
You agree, even though he contradicted himself?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 04:46 AM
 
2,854 posts, read 2,053,876 times
Reputation: 348
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top