Court rules Kim Davis can be personally sued for not issuing marriage licenses for Gay and Lesbian couples (disciples, priests)

[badlander]

Originally Posted by NY Jew

Jewish businesses were sued for signs equally applied requesting modesty, the same ones pushing for lgbt laws pushed this evil

https://vosizneias.com/2013/02/16/br...-tznius-signs/

I agree, banning shorts during the summer is evil. That's 4 to 5 months straight I wouldn't go into that store.

Is this Orthodox Judaism?

I think you are also pretty loose with the evil definition.

[nateswift]

Originally Posted by NY Jew

The city agreed to stop the fine, if all signs says optional only. The chasidim foolishly gave in

So, basically, your "horrible thing being done to Jewish shipowners turned into a tempest in a teapot and you are miffed because the question was settled amicably and fairly for everyone.... got it.

[normstad]

Originally Posted by NY Jew

I had a cousin who was injured in a suicide bombing, and another who was shot at killing her best friend in front of her face, please spare me you nonsense.

Please spare us the nonsense that LGBTQ people who are suing to enforce their human rights are equal to being to terrorists you describe.

Your over the top hyperbole is getting a bit thin, similar to your continued protestations of persecution.

[badlander]

Originally Posted by NY Jew

In my book there is a thing called trials and due process of law.

So witches should be charged and tried? Just like in Saudi Arabia? And what then capital punishment?

I sure hope you aren't playing me as I am accepting what you tell me on face value. I have never communicate with any person similar to you in my almost 70 decades of life. Witches should be tried, LBGT who stick up for their rights are terrorist, wearing shorts is evil, you should be able to decide what I am allowed to buy based on your religious views..it's a big and unpleasant world you present. A very strange world Master Bob.

[nateswift]

Originally Posted by NY Jew

The organization didn't endorse, the rabbis endorsed.



It clearly said for identification purposes only.



Many of those schools and shuls have multiple rabbis who signed and other rabbis who didn't sign (probably weren't offered)

So saying it was a religious requirement was a lie?

[NY Jew]

Originally Posted by nateswift

So, basically, your "horrible thing being done to Jewish shipowners turned into a tempest in a teapot and you are miffed because the question was settled amicably and fairly for everyone.... got it.

It was never about the money

[NY Jew]

Originally Posted by nateswift

So saying it was a religious requirement was a lie?

No, there was no religious requirement to sign a letter. Voting against him was the religious requirement.

[nateswift]

Originally Posted by NY Jew

No, there was no religious requirement to sign a letter. Voting against him was the religious requirement.

According to SOME rabbis. Why do YOU pick the opinion that supports YOUR prejudices? Oh, yeah.

[badlander]

Originally Posted by NY Jew

My store my choice.
Until I sell it I own it, I should have 100% rights to do whatever I want with it. Why should you have any right to decide what I do with my property or who I sell my property to.

You were speaking about supporting a third party limiting my rights to buy what a Christian would be allowed so no its not your shop.

And no you don't have full rights to do whatever you want in your shop. You still need to follow laws and regulations, health and safety, fire marshall, permits and so forth. Even shop owners have some laws to obey.

However your post responded to had nothing to do with your shop. You stated you would support a Christian from allowing me to buy a non kosher product based on your religious views. In other words you would agree with having my rights removed and your rights supercede mine when it comes to me buying products from another party.

[303Guy]

Folks, NY Jew is having us all on! Good one NY Jew!