Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-03-2020, 02:40 PM
 
28,432 posts, read 11,577,622 times
Reputation: 2070

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by highplainsrus View Post
The vocabulary of higher mathematics is very poetic. If only it weren't so hard to understand.
Not so different from Sanskrit. I like this about Witten: "he is also a tennis player".
Theory of Everything, huh? "it from quibit"! ordinary reality is not so boring, after all.
Witten is pretty coherent. the questions are better than the answers.
Its the questions that give meaning.
Hmmmm ... stated so many different ways, but i think its true.

we are just laying the ground work. Every mass extinction left something for the next life forms to make the next step. O2, then oil, started the ball rolling. We leave information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-03-2020, 02:46 PM
 
15,963 posts, read 7,024,232 times
Reputation: 8545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arach Angle View Post
The deer isn't a projection as much as it is formed from the inputs. The deer is there. It may not be what we think it is, but it is there.

is this brhman like looking at a person and not seeing parts. the eyes, nose, mouth aren't really seen as we talk to the person. Like looking out the window and seeing everything tied together as one? A functioning unit we call the universe. I keep to the biosphere because we empirical, but I don't see it as individual parts. No more than I see my kid as parts.

what does this self realized mean? does it mean we see our true place?

Per Advaita philosophy Self-realization means the realization that the Cosmos out there is the only truth, the only reality, and we are that. Advaita calls it Brhman and it transcends any attributes, is beyond time and space.

The reason we see ourselves as separate is because our mind conceals the truth and projects a world made of names and forms.

The world is not non-existent, it is a relative reality, with which we transact until realization is achieved. The world will still be with us when we achieve the realization but we would know it as unreal. That is liberation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2020, 03:04 PM
 
28,432 posts, read 11,577,622 times
Reputation: 2070
Quote:
Originally Posted by cb2008 View Post
Per Advaita philosophy Self-realization means the realization that the Cosmos out there is the only truth, the only reality, and we are that. Advaita calls it Brhman and it transcends any attributes, is beyond time and space.

The reason we see ourselves as separate is because our mind conceals the truth and projects a world made of names and forms.

The world is not non-existent, it is a relative reality, with which we transact until realization is achieved. The world will still be with us when we achieve the realization but we would know it as unreal. That is liberation.
well ... thats almost exactly what the science points too.

I use "illusory" as apposed to "unreal." meaning it just different than we think it is. Those difference are exactly what you just said. For example: Dark matter points to the fact when I look at you there may be 6 times "more you" than I see (overs simplified and loosely applied of course).

so can we still understand this and not be anxious about it? I mean I can see it, I can show its more valid than denying it, and understand my place in it. I have a little trouble with the nervous part.

I still worry about losing my house ... type thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2020, 04:39 PM
 
15,963 posts, read 7,024,232 times
Reputation: 8545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arach Angle View Post
well ... thats almost exactly what the science points too.

I use "illusory" as apposed to "unreal." meaning it just different than we think it is. Those difference are exactly what you just said. For example: Dark matter points to the fact when I look at you there may be 6 times "more you" than I see (overs simplified and loosely applied of course).

so can we still understand this and not be anxious about it? I mean I can see it, I can show its more valid than denying it, and understand my place in it. I have a little trouble with the nervous part.

I still worry about losing my house ... type thing.
Not quite illusion. The projection and obscuring that happens when we perceive the world as real is the cause of anxiety, sorrow, and pain.
So change your attitude. Try to live in the present. Take deep breaths, meditate. Dont ruminate about the past and dont fear the future. Live lightly, live with kindness. Give.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2020, 04:40 PM
 
Location: high plains
802 posts, read 984,096 times
Reputation: 635
Quote:
Originally Posted by cb2008 View Post
Can you give me a reference to this verse?
Considering that it is our mind that projects the world, the deer too is a projection of our mind. The human body, that is merely a house for all the instruments that are stored in it, be means of which we project this world, is the only vehicle fit to gain awareness of the Self and gain liberation.
So we see the deer (the form and name) when we are as yet Un-relaized conciousness. When we are Self-relaized we merely see Brhman, because that is all there is.
Your answer is the simpler, usually better, approach.

In the first Johnston translation link I posted, it is the end of Part I. Not really in verse form,
here is the full piece. I'll look for it in the Johnston translation you posted and in what I think
is the longer version in verse form. It may be that Tattva Bodha is only intended for the human
experience and simply does not relate to this condundrum.

What is Bliss?
The own-nature of Joy.
Thus let a man know that the own-nature of his own Self is Being, Consciousness, Bliss.

--------

In this interpretation (same text), Johnston clarifies the distinction between this Catechism and the
longer Crest Jewel.

https://universaltheosophy.com/artic...-tattva-bodha/

"What is Bliss?
—The own-nature of Joy.
Thus let a man know that the own nature of his own Self is Being, Consciousness, Bliss."

Last edited by highplainsrus; 09-03-2020 at 05:16 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2020, 05:11 PM
 
28,432 posts, read 11,577,622 times
Reputation: 2070
Quote:
Originally Posted by cb2008 View Post
Not quite illusion. The projection and obscuring that happens when we perceive the world as real is the cause of anxiety, sorrow, and pain.
So change your attitude. Try to live in the present. Take deep breaths, meditate. Dont ruminate about the past and dont fear the future. Live lightly, live with kindness. Give.
"projection" and "obscuring" ... yeah, I can definitely see that in a lot of cases. in fact, it does fit better to what we see people doing.

as the cause to real pain. In a way for sure. but some people, in fact many people, use "projection" and "obscuring" to hide from pain and suffering. But they do cause those around them suffering many times too.

so yeah, processing it ... I tend to agree with you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2020, 05:50 PM
 
Location: high plains
802 posts, read 984,096 times
Reputation: 635
Quote:
Originally Posted by cb2008 View Post
Not quite illusion. The projection and obscuring that happens when we perceive the world as real is the cause of anxiety, sorrow, and pain.
So change your attitude. Try to live in the present. Take deep breaths, meditate. Dont ruminate about the past and dont fear the future. Live lightly, live with kindness. Give.
Some readings express strategies for life that emphasize a kind of introspection that reduces or removes the uncomfortable feelings and thoughts. Asking "who is it that feels this emotion?" and "is that really me?". Are the emotions productive or distracting? I better stop before I exceed my depth. I don't have references to the readings at hand.

Last edited by highplainsrus; 09-03-2020 at 06:01 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2020, 06:01 PM
 
28,432 posts, read 11,577,622 times
Reputation: 2070
Quote:
Originally Posted by highplainsrus View Post
Some readings express strategies for life that emphasize a kind of introspection that reduces or removes the uncomfortable feelings and thoughts. Asking "who is it that feels this emotion?" and "is that really me?". Are the emotions productive or distracting? I better stop before I exceed my depth.
well thats why crazy fits right?

I know there is no logical reason (but how I grew up) for my emotional response. I understand its a thin vial and all I have to do is walk through it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2020, 07:53 PM
 
Location: high plains
802 posts, read 984,096 times
Reputation: 635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arach Angle View Post
well thats why crazy fits right?

I know there is no logical reason (but how I grew up) for my emotional response. I understand its a thin vial and all I have to do is walk through it.
We better not get into how psychology looks at all this. I peeked into it and didn't care for it.

There may not be a deer conundrum at all if it is like this:
Self is all Being. All Being is Self.
That seems simple enough.

Tattva's subject is a subset of all being - humans.

Last edited by highplainsrus; 09-03-2020 at 08:19 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2020, 06:05 AM
 
28,432 posts, read 11,577,622 times
Reputation: 2070
Quote:
Originally Posted by highplainsrus View Post
We better not get into how psychology looks at all this. I peeked into it and didn't care for it.

There may not be a deer conundrum at all if it is like this:
Self is all Being. All Being is Self.
That seems simple enough.

Tattva's subject is a subset of all being - humans.
definitely off topic ...

spacetime and qed clearly show that whatever we are, the system around is at least that. We are all the same thing. "spacetime". Its almost nonsensical at this point to argue it.

if I am classified as alive, there really is no legitimate way to classify the system around me as not alive. In fact, here at CD the only way to counter the claim is to say its theist-like then bash you over the head with it. Or they use composition fallacy, that actually doesn't address the data being used. It lumps it into "fallacy" then dismisses it out of hand. Its just a tool used to demonstrate error to people that don't get how to use data to make a statement of belief.

the question really is about "how big is this oneness?" also, the notion of "always has been." ... when does a being that last 70-ish years "experience" 10^100 years as infinity? But it doesn't have to be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top