Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think the opposite. I think when one believes in our life going on after death ...anything goes.
Back to how do the regulars squirrels just trying to get a nut sort it out.
Regular squirrels are not co-dependent upon what others do. That's a whole other type of animal. And those animals get their nuts observing others whether people like it or not.
Regular squirrels are not co-dependent upon what others do. That's a whole other type of animal. And those animals get their nuts observing others whether people like it or not.
again ... how do we know who is who?
Is crossing checking people's claims against known observations mean a person is co dependent? Is saying that we really need to be careful of error and personal bias so lets check things out really that sick of a way to live?
Is crossing checking people's claims against known observations mean a person is co dependent? Is saying that we really need to be careful of error and personal bias so lets check things out really that sick of a way to live?
Yes. Your spatilality or whatever you call it is co-dependent on others. That's really dangerous because it leaves no room for individuality. "Make a list and let me decide"!
I guess so, if you do not believe life continues after death... anything goes.
"Anything goes" whenever you venture into the realm of believing in something for which there is no evidence or proof that something exists. Spirituality, a soul, life after death, God are just a few such things among many...
"Anything goes" whenever you venture into the realm of believing in something for which there is no evidence or proof that something exists. Spirituality, a soul, life after death, God are just a few such things among many...
What one may consider proof another may consider foolishness. For example, there's been numerous apparition captured on tape. Some seem to interact with the environment. It is up to each to make up their own mind, but to declare their is no proof doesn't speak for all.
Yes. Your spatilality or whatever you call it is co-dependent on others. That's really dangerous because it leaves no room for individuality. "Make a list and let me decide"!
I think that about wraps this up.
Arach:
We need to come up with a process to try and limit error and personal bias via other people.
Gabfest:
saying that "We need to come up with a process to try and limit error and personal bias via other people" or whatever you call it is co-dependent on others. That's really dangerous because it leaves no room for individuality
What one may consider proof another may consider foolishness. For example, there's been numerous apparition captured on tape. Some seem to interact with the environment. It is up to each to make up their own mind, but to declare their is no proof doesn't speak for all.
Quite obviously true. There are still folks who believe the earth is flat afterall, and they've got all the evidence they need to be convinced. Where does that leave us?
Leaves us having to recognize that not all evidence or proof is equal or worthy, and this forum does nothing but provide an arena for banter as to which is which. Ultimately for all us banters to judge as we will, and for all of us to waste a whole lot of time in the process...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.