Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LOL. You are not the first person to say I should have tried politics. I will take it as a compliment. Now if only science can tell me which party to join according to my brain wiring.
I don't know how many times a friend of mine has sent me official documentation from scientists who turn out to be exactly as you explain here. AKA quacks. Even when I reply with the facts about these people, it's as if someone is making up the well-documented quackery of these people. Hey, but at least we're not getting as much about Scientism here lately. That's a good sign...
Your Scientism is the result of your inappropriately expanding the authority of science beyond what is KNOWN. When you demand that science be able to validate what is NOT KNOWN, you are engaging in scientism. It is appropriate to use what science KNOWS to refute what is claimed, but NOT to demand that science validate what is NOT KNOWN.
Your Scientism is the result of your inappropriately expanding the authority of science beyond what is KNOWN. When you demand that science be able to validate what is NOT KNOWN, you are engaging in scientism. It is appropriate to use what science KNOWS to refute what is claimed, but NOT to demand that science validate what is NOT KNOWN.
So the only person doing scientism is you, but you accuse others to try and hide this.
So the only person doing scientism is you, but you accuse others to try and hide this.
You are the prime example of scientism with your demands that we provide validated science for what is NOT YET KNOWN but seems plausible based on what we DO KNOW.
You are the prime example of scientism with your demands that we provide validated science for what is NOT YET KNOWN but seems plausible based on what we DO KNOW.
No, we don't demand that...unless you start pushing us to believe what you believe.
You are the prime example of scientism with your demands that we provide validated science for what is NOT YET KNOWN but seems plausible based on what we DO KNOW.
Your usual distorted and false ad hominem.
I am extrapolating from what we know, it is you who is arguing a god of the gaps.
I am asking for evidence for what you claim to know, and the fact you do everything to avoid providing any evidence tells us you have none, as well as your lack of knowledge about basic science.
Seriously, Kapitan Ego, you have been exposed so often, one must ask why you keep pretending you are an authority on anything.
certainly a person is free to believe whatever they choose.
including the belief that they "understand a person's perspective."
however patronizing precludes understanding.
Last edited by Tzaphkiel; 12-21-2021 at 11:33 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
^Can one ignore yourself.
